Pub Date : 2025-12-08DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03240-1
A J M Pronk, J Y van Oostendorp, I J M Han-Geurts, S Madelska, C J Buskens, W A Bemelman
Introduction: Perianal fistulas often require multiple surgical interventions because of their chronic nature. Various sphincter-sparing techniques achieve clinical closure rates of up to 70%, yet recurrence remains a major challenge. Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy has shown promise in wound healing, but its application in perianal fistulas remains largely unexplored. The Semiflex catheter was developed to facilitate outpatient vacuum therapy without the need for general anesthesia during catheter exchanges. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical applicability of the Semiflex catheter in perianal fistula management.
Methods: The Semiflex pilot study was a two-part feasibility trial. The first part assessed proof of principle in ten patients, while the second part, a multicentre study, aimed to confirm feasibility in 20 patients. Feasibility included smoothness of insertion and changing of the Semiflex catheters, capability of proper fixation of the Semiflex catheter, maintaining vacuum for more than 48 h, and compliance to the therapy in terms of pain and discomfort. The protocol was scored feasible if at least 50% of the exchanges met all these criteria in at least 70% of patients. Secondary outcomes included clinical fistula closure, radiological healing, and treatment-related adverse events.
Results: Twenty patients were included (median age 39.5 years; 70% Crohn's disease). Thirteen Semiflex treatments were scored as feasible, below the predefined threshold. Clinical fistula closure was observed in 50% of patients, but none showed radiological healing at 3 months. One serious adverse event occurred, requiring early treatment discontinuation, while minor complications, including local skin reactions and pressure sores, were managed conservatively.
Conclusions: Semiflex therapy was feasible in a subset of patients and allowed outpatient treatment. However, maintaining vacuum and achieving long-term fistula closure remains challenging. While Semiflex may have a role in perianal fistula management, further research is needed to refine patient selection and optimize its application.
{"title":"Semiflex-assisted vacuum therapy for perianal fistulas: the Semiflex pilot study.","authors":"A J M Pronk, J Y van Oostendorp, I J M Han-Geurts, S Madelska, C J Buskens, W A Bemelman","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03240-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03240-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Perianal fistulas often require multiple surgical interventions because of their chronic nature. Various sphincter-sparing techniques achieve clinical closure rates of up to 70%, yet recurrence remains a major challenge. Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy has shown promise in wound healing, but its application in perianal fistulas remains largely unexplored. The Semiflex catheter was developed to facilitate outpatient vacuum therapy without the need for general anesthesia during catheter exchanges. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical applicability of the Semiflex catheter in perianal fistula management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Semiflex pilot study was a two-part feasibility trial. The first part assessed proof of principle in ten patients, while the second part, a multicentre study, aimed to confirm feasibility in 20 patients. Feasibility included smoothness of insertion and changing of the Semiflex catheters, capability of proper fixation of the Semiflex catheter, maintaining vacuum for more than 48 h, and compliance to the therapy in terms of pain and discomfort. The protocol was scored feasible if at least 50% of the exchanges met all these criteria in at least 70% of patients. Secondary outcomes included clinical fistula closure, radiological healing, and treatment-related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty patients were included (median age 39.5 years; 70% Crohn's disease). Thirteen Semiflex treatments were scored as feasible, below the predefined threshold. Clinical fistula closure was observed in 50% of patients, but none showed radiological healing at 3 months. One serious adverse event occurred, requiring early treatment discontinuation, while minor complications, including local skin reactions and pressure sores, were managed conservatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Semiflex therapy was feasible in a subset of patients and allowed outpatient treatment. However, maintaining vacuum and achieving long-term fistula closure remains challenging. While Semiflex may have a role in perianal fistula management, further research is needed to refine patient selection and optimize its application.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"30 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12685983/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145702848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-08DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03236-x
Alessandro Ferdinando Ruffolo, Tomaso Melocchi, Chrystèle Rubod, Yohan Kerbage, Giuseppe Campagna, Sara Mastrovito, Alfredo Ercoli, Giovanni Panico, Michel Cosson, Marine Lallemant
Introduction: Limited data exists in literature regarding concomitant ventral rectopexy (VRP) and sacrocolpo/hysteropexy (SCP/SHP), with existing studies being predominantly retrospective. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the anatomical and functional outcomes of combined VRP and SCP/SHP for the treatment of multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
Methods: We performed systematic research and meta-analysis from PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, until 15 January 2025. Women submitted to VRP with SCP/SHP were included. Improvement of anorectal symptoms were evaluated. Postoperative anatomical relapse was reported. Re-operation rates were evaluated.
Results: Six articles were included. Constipation/obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) [odds ratio (OR) 0.26, 95% CI 0.10-0.68; p = 0.006 (I2 test 81%, p = 0.56)] and of anal/fecal incontinence (AI/FI) rates [OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03-0.30; p < 0.0001 (I2 test 70%, p = 0.04)] significantly improved after combined VRP and SCP/SHP. The proportion metanalysis of four included studies reported a subjective POP recurrence rate of 7% (95% CI 1-13%; I2 test 82.9%, p < 0.001). The proportion metanalysis of five included studies for objective POP recurrence was 5% (95% CI 1-9%; I2 test 56.9%, p = 0.041). No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusions: VRP combined with SCP/SHP has been shown to be safe and effective for women with multicompartment POP, providing optimal anatomical and functional outcomes. Larger, long-term, prospective-controlled studies are needed to confirm these results.
文献中关于腹侧直肠固定术(VRP)和骶结肠/子宫固定术(SCP/SHP)的数据有限,现有的研究主要是回顾性的。本荟萃分析的目的是评估VRP和SCP/SHP联合治疗多房室盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的解剖和功能结果。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA) 2020指南的首选报告项目,我们从PubMed/MEDLINE和EMBASE进行了系统研究和荟萃分析,直到2025年1月15日。患有SCP/SHP的妇女被纳入VRP。评估肛门直肠症状的改善情况。术后解剖复发均有报道。评估再手术率。结果:纳入6篇文章。便秘/排便障碍综合征(ODS)[优势比(OR) 0.26, 95% CI 0.10-0.68;p = 0.006 (I2试验81%,p = 0.56)]和肛门/大便失禁(AI/FI)发生率[OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03-0.30;p 2检验70%,p = 0.04)], VRP与SCP/SHP联合治疗后显著改善。四项纳入研究的比例元分析报告主观POP复发率为7% (95% CI 1-13%; I2检验82.9%,p 2检验56.9%,p = 0.041)。无严重不良事件报告。结论:VRP联合SCP/SHP已被证明是安全有效的治疗女性多室POP,提供最佳的解剖和功能结果。需要更大规模的、长期的、前瞻性对照研究来证实这些结果。
{"title":"Anatomical and functional outcomes of combined ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpo/hysteropexy for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Alessandro Ferdinando Ruffolo, Tomaso Melocchi, Chrystèle Rubod, Yohan Kerbage, Giuseppe Campagna, Sara Mastrovito, Alfredo Ercoli, Giovanni Panico, Michel Cosson, Marine Lallemant","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03236-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03236-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Limited data exists in literature regarding concomitant ventral rectopexy (VRP) and sacrocolpo/hysteropexy (SCP/SHP), with existing studies being predominantly retrospective. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the anatomical and functional outcomes of combined VRP and SCP/SHP for the treatment of multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse (POP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed systematic research and meta-analysis from PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, until 15 January 2025. Women submitted to VRP with SCP/SHP were included. Improvement of anorectal symptoms were evaluated. Postoperative anatomical relapse was reported. Re-operation rates were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six articles were included. Constipation/obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) [odds ratio (OR) 0.26, 95% CI 0.10-0.68; p = 0.006 (I<sup>2</sup> test 81%, p = 0.56)] and of anal/fecal incontinence (AI/FI) rates [OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03-0.30; p < 0.0001 (I<sup>2</sup> test 70%, p = 0.04)] significantly improved after combined VRP and SCP/SHP. The proportion metanalysis of four included studies reported a subjective POP recurrence rate of 7% (95% CI 1-13%; I<sup>2</sup> test 82.9%, p < 0.001). The proportion metanalysis of five included studies for objective POP recurrence was 5% (95% CI 1-9%; I<sup>2</sup> test 56.9%, p = 0.041). No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VRP combined with SCP/SHP has been shown to be safe and effective for women with multicompartment POP, providing optimal anatomical and functional outcomes. Larger, long-term, prospective-controlled studies are needed to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"30 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12685978/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145702824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-08DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03242-z
T Pelly, E Anand, S Holubar, P Tozer, A Hart
Introduction: Unhealed wounds and persistent perineal sinuses (PPS) may occur in as many as one third of patients after proctectomy for Crohn's disease. The management of these conditions remains a significant challenge, particularly in the context of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with existing therapies plagued by high failure rates. This systematic review of the literature assessed the efficacy of medical and surgical therapy for PPS closure in IBD. Secondary aims included review of classification systems used for PPS.
Methods: A literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases on 17 December 2024. The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024622582). Inclusion criteria were adult patients with IBD and PPS or unhealed wounds following proctectomy. We excluded abstract-only publications, case reports, cancer and paediatric cohorts. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts and extracted data. The primary outcome was clinical healing rate. Secondary outcomes included classification systems used to describe PPS. Risk of bias was assessed.
Results: Of 496 records identified, following removal of duplicates, 489 abstracts were screened, and 60 full text articles assessed for eligibility. Of 25 articles included in the final analysis, 23 were case series or retrospective cohort studies, and all were at high risk of bias. No randomised controlled trials were identified. Five articles (including two of the case series) described classification systems for PPS. Interventions included hyperbaric oxygen therapy, Karydakis flap, cleft closure, omentoplasty, skin grafting, gracilis and rectus abdominis flap, platelet-derived growth factor, curettage, lay open and excision of sinuses. Reported healing rates ranged from 30% to 100%. Heterogeneity in the reporting of outcomes, as well as the interventions performed precluded meta-analysis.
Conclusion: The published evidence for treatment of PPS in IBD consists of low-quality evidence case series with high risk of bias. There is a need for standardised outcome reporting and high-quality, prospective studies to establish effective treatment algorithms.
{"title":"Systematic review: The management of unhealed wounds and persistent perineal sinuses following proctectomy in inflammatory bowel disease.","authors":"T Pelly, E Anand, S Holubar, P Tozer, A Hart","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03242-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03242-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Unhealed wounds and persistent perineal sinuses (PPS) may occur in as many as one third of patients after proctectomy for Crohn's disease. The management of these conditions remains a significant challenge, particularly in the context of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with existing therapies plagued by high failure rates. This systematic review of the literature assessed the efficacy of medical and surgical therapy for PPS closure in IBD. Secondary aims included review of classification systems used for PPS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases on 17 December 2024. The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024622582). Inclusion criteria were adult patients with IBD and PPS or unhealed wounds following proctectomy. We excluded abstract-only publications, case reports, cancer and paediatric cohorts. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts and extracted data. The primary outcome was clinical healing rate. Secondary outcomes included classification systems used to describe PPS. Risk of bias was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 496 records identified, following removal of duplicates, 489 abstracts were screened, and 60 full text articles assessed for eligibility. Of 25 articles included in the final analysis, 23 were case series or retrospective cohort studies, and all were at high risk of bias. No randomised controlled trials were identified. Five articles (including two of the case series) described classification systems for PPS. Interventions included hyperbaric oxygen therapy, Karydakis flap, cleft closure, omentoplasty, skin grafting, gracilis and rectus abdominis flap, platelet-derived growth factor, curettage, lay open and excision of sinuses. Reported healing rates ranged from 30% to 100%. Heterogeneity in the reporting of outcomes, as well as the interventions performed precluded meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The published evidence for treatment of PPS in IBD consists of low-quality evidence case series with high risk of bias. There is a need for standardised outcome reporting and high-quality, prospective studies to establish effective treatment algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"30 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12686021/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145702837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-04DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03239-8
J Bunni, E D Courtney
{"title":"Techniques in coloproctology - controversies in coloproctology resection: rectopexy is an underutilised procedure in the management of both symptomatic high-grade internal and external rectal prolapse.","authors":"J Bunni, E D Courtney","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03239-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03239-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"30 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12678511/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145670676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03220-5
A Sahin
{"title":"From prediction to clinical action in colorectal surgery: rethinking DLNN use for postoperative risk.","authors":"A Sahin","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03220-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03220-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"30 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12669326/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145649949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-28DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03241-0
A Troester, J Frebault, E Von Der Marwitz, E Arsoniadis, S M Goldberg, P Goffredo, C Jahansouz
Background: Transsphincteric anal fistula is a common and challenging diagnosis for patients and surgeons alike. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) following non-cutting seton placement represents an established definitive treatment with many technical variations. Unfortunately, up to 53% of attempted LIFTs fail. We aim to describe a modified LIFT approach and evaluate outcomes at our institution.
Methods: Thirty-two patients from 2021 to 2024 underwent the modified LIFT approach which included the offsetting of the transected fistula ends with interposing muscle plication, along with closure of the internal opening, and wide excision of the external opening. Retrospective chart review was performed to assess rates of primary wound healing, complications, recurrence, and incontinence. Recurrences were grouped into three types: type I, sinus tract or recurrent abscess without an internal opening; type II, conversion to an intersphincteric fistula; and type III, transsphincteric recurrence.
Results: The majority of patients were male (69%) with a mean age of 44 years and mean BMI 31.6 kg/m2. Median operative time was 88 min. Primary healing rate was 94%. Median healing period was 7 (range 4-16) weeks. Of the 10 recurrences, (5 type I, 5 type II, and 0 type III), median time to recurrence was 6 months after the primary wound healed. No patients experienced any postoperative incontinence or urinary retention.
Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with transsphincteric fistulas undergoing the LIFT procedure, the addition of offsetting muscle plication effectively limited transsphincteric recurrence. Further investigation is warranted to directly compare this LIFT adaptation to previously published literature.
{"title":"A modified LIFT approach of offsetting sphincter muscle plication aimed at decreasing recurrence rates: a single-center retrospective review.","authors":"A Troester, J Frebault, E Von Der Marwitz, E Arsoniadis, S M Goldberg, P Goffredo, C Jahansouz","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03241-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-025-03241-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transsphincteric anal fistula is a common and challenging diagnosis for patients and surgeons alike. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) following non-cutting seton placement represents an established definitive treatment with many technical variations. Unfortunately, up to 53% of attempted LIFTs fail. We aim to describe a modified LIFT approach and evaluate outcomes at our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two patients from 2021 to 2024 underwent the modified LIFT approach which included the offsetting of the transected fistula ends with interposing muscle plication, along with closure of the internal opening, and wide excision of the external opening. Retrospective chart review was performed to assess rates of primary wound healing, complications, recurrence, and incontinence. Recurrences were grouped into three types: type I, sinus tract or recurrent abscess without an internal opening; type II, conversion to an intersphincteric fistula; and type III, transsphincteric recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of patients were male (69%) with a mean age of 44 years and mean BMI 31.6 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Median operative time was 88 min. Primary healing rate was 94%. Median healing period was 7 (range 4-16) weeks. Of the 10 recurrences, (5 type I, 5 type II, and 0 type III), median time to recurrence was 6 months after the primary wound healed. No patients experienced any postoperative incontinence or urinary retention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cohort of patients with transsphincteric fistulas undergoing the LIFT procedure, the addition of offsetting muscle plication effectively limited transsphincteric recurrence. Further investigation is warranted to directly compare this LIFT adaptation to previously published literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145642334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-24DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03237-w
T Yang, J Qi, X Lin, L Shi, F Li, Q Wu, L Huang, D Fan, J Hu
Background and study aim: Endoscopic intermuscular dissection (EID) is an emerging technique for resecting early rectal cancer with deep submucosal infiltration. This study reports the short-term outcomes of EID for early rectal cancer from a single-center experience in China.
Patients and methods: Between January 2024 and March 2025, 12 patients diagnosed with rectal malignant tumors, with CT staging ≤ T2 and no lymph node metastasis underwent EID. For lesions staged as cT2, endoscopic ultrasound confirmation of no muscularis propria invasion was required prior to EID for therapeutic resection at our center. All patients were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team and provided informed consent. The primary outcomes included technical success (defined as macroscopic complete en bloc resection without major intraprocedural complications), postoperative complications, and tumor-free resection margins. Secondary outcomes included hospital stay duration, follow-up completion rates, and short-term oncological outcomes.
Results: Technical success was achieved in 11 of 12 patients (91.7%), with one patient experiencing an intraprocedural perforation. En bloc resection margins were confirmed histopathologically in all cases. One patient (8.3%) experienced delayed perforation requiring additional surgery. All lesions were confirmed as pT1b adenocarcinoma on final pathology. Among patients who reached follow-up timepoints, 6-month follow-up completion was 100% (9/9 eligible patients) and 12-month follow-up completion was 50.0% (2/4 eligible patients). No tumor recurrence was observed in patients with available follow-up data during a median follow-up of 9 months (range 3-16 months).
Conclusion: This preliminary single-center experience suggests that EID may be a feasible technique for carefully selected cases of resecting early rectal cancer with deep submucosal infiltration, demonstrating acceptable rates of complete resection and reasonable short-term safety profiles. However, the small sample size, staging limitations, and short follow-up period mean that these findings require cautious interpretation. Larger multicenter studies with extended follow-up periods are necessary to establish the role of EID in the treatment algorithm for early rectal cancer.
{"title":"Short-term outcomes of endoscopic intermuscular dissection for early rectal cancer with deep submucosal infiltration: a single-center experience from China.","authors":"T Yang, J Qi, X Lin, L Shi, F Li, Q Wu, L Huang, D Fan, J Hu","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03237-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03237-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aim: </strong>Endoscopic intermuscular dissection (EID) is an emerging technique for resecting early rectal cancer with deep submucosal infiltration. This study reports the short-term outcomes of EID for early rectal cancer from a single-center experience in China.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between January 2024 and March 2025, 12 patients diagnosed with rectal malignant tumors, with CT staging ≤ T2 and no lymph node metastasis underwent EID. For lesions staged as cT2, endoscopic ultrasound confirmation of no muscularis propria invasion was required prior to EID for therapeutic resection at our center. All patients were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team and provided informed consent. The primary outcomes included technical success (defined as macroscopic complete en bloc resection without major intraprocedural complications), postoperative complications, and tumor-free resection margins. Secondary outcomes included hospital stay duration, follow-up completion rates, and short-term oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technical success was achieved in 11 of 12 patients (91.7%), with one patient experiencing an intraprocedural perforation. En bloc resection margins were confirmed histopathologically in all cases. One patient (8.3%) experienced delayed perforation requiring additional surgery. All lesions were confirmed as pT1b adenocarcinoma on final pathology. Among patients who reached follow-up timepoints, 6-month follow-up completion was 100% (9/9 eligible patients) and 12-month follow-up completion was 50.0% (2/4 eligible patients). No tumor recurrence was observed in patients with available follow-up data during a median follow-up of 9 months (range 3-16 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This preliminary single-center experience suggests that EID may be a feasible technique for carefully selected cases of resecting early rectal cancer with deep submucosal infiltration, demonstrating acceptable rates of complete resection and reasonable short-term safety profiles. However, the small sample size, staging limitations, and short follow-up period mean that these findings require cautious interpretation. Larger multicenter studies with extended follow-up periods are necessary to establish the role of EID in the treatment algorithm for early rectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"29 1","pages":"191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12644190/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145589477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-23DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03169-5
E G M van Geffen, F S Verheij, S M J A Hazen, T C Sluckin, E C J Consten, J-W T Dekker, J Nederend, K C M J Peeters, J H W de Wilt, S van Dieren, R Hompes, J B Tuynman, C A M Marijnen, P J Tanis, M Kusters
Background: In the Netherlands, approximately 15% of patients with rectal cancer undergo a low Hartmann's procedure (low-HP). This is often preoperatively planned to avoid poor functional outcome or complications, but might be unplanned as a result of intraoperative difficulties. Low-HPs seem to be associated with worse oncological outcomes.
Methods: All patients who underwent either restorative low anterior resection (rLAR), planned low-HP, or unplanned low-HP for primary rectal cancer in 2016 were included from a nationwide cohort. Main outcomes were 4-year local recurrence (LR) rate and disease-free survival (DFS).
Results: Of 2043 patients, 1704 underwent rLAR (83.4%), 253 planned low-HP (12.4%), and 86 unplanned low-HP (4.2%). Among intended rLAR patients (n = 1790), independent risk factors for unplanned low-HP were older age, higher body mass index (BMI), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and more distal tumor location. Oncological outcomes after low-HPs were worse than after rLARs (LR 13.7% vs 5.6%, DFS 54.7% vs 71.8%, both p < 0.001), but similar for unplanned and planned low-HP. In multivariable analysis, unplanned and planned low-HP were not associated with LR or DFS, but R1 resection was (HR 6.6 (4.1-10.6), HR 3.0 (2.2-4.0), respectively). In R1 resections, the distal margin was more often involved after low-HP (70.0% vs 28.6%, p = 0.013) compared to rLAR.
Conclusion: Poor outcomes in univariable analysis after low-HP appear to be associated with more challenging procedures and increased risk of involved resection margin rather than the low-HP itself. In case of expected difficulties, an extralevator abdominoperineal excision or referral to an expert center might be an alternative to improve resection margins.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05539417, retrospectively registered on September 16, 2022.
背景:在荷兰,大约15%的直肠癌患者接受了低哈特曼手术(low- hp)。这通常是术前计划的,以避免功能不良或并发症,但可能由于术中困难而计划外。低hp似乎与较差的肿瘤预后有关。方法:2016年所有接受恢复性前低位切除术(rLAR)、计划低hp或非计划低hp治疗原发性直肠癌的患者均来自全国队列。主要结果为4年局部复发率(LR)和无病生存期(DFS)。结果:在2043例患者中,1704例接受了rLAR(83.4%), 253例计划低hp(12.4%), 86例非计划低hp(4.2%)。在预期的rLAR患者(n = 1790)中,意外低hp的独立危险因素是年龄较大,体重指数(BMI)较高,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分较高,肿瘤位置较远。低hp后的肿瘤预后比rLARs后更差(LR 13.7% vs 5.6%, DFS 54.7% vs 71.8%,两者均为p结论:低hp后单变量分析的不良预后似乎与更具挑战性的手术和累及切除边缘的风险增加有关,而不是低hp本身。在预期困难的情况下,腹外展手术切除或转诊到专家中心可能是提高切除边缘的另一种选择。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,识别码NCT05539417,回顾性注册于2022年9月16日。
{"title":"Oncological outcomes of planned and unplanned low Hartmann's procedure and restorative low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a population-based cross-sectional study.","authors":"E G M van Geffen, F S Verheij, S M J A Hazen, T C Sluckin, E C J Consten, J-W T Dekker, J Nederend, K C M J Peeters, J H W de Wilt, S van Dieren, R Hompes, J B Tuynman, C A M Marijnen, P J Tanis, M Kusters","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03169-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03169-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the Netherlands, approximately 15% of patients with rectal cancer undergo a low Hartmann's procedure (low-HP). This is often preoperatively planned to avoid poor functional outcome or complications, but might be unplanned as a result of intraoperative difficulties. Low-HPs seem to be associated with worse oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who underwent either restorative low anterior resection (rLAR), planned low-HP, or unplanned low-HP for primary rectal cancer in 2016 were included from a nationwide cohort. Main outcomes were 4-year local recurrence (LR) rate and disease-free survival (DFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2043 patients, 1704 underwent rLAR (83.4%), 253 planned low-HP (12.4%), and 86 unplanned low-HP (4.2%). Among intended rLAR patients (n = 1790), independent risk factors for unplanned low-HP were older age, higher body mass index (BMI), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and more distal tumor location. Oncological outcomes after low-HPs were worse than after rLARs (LR 13.7% vs 5.6%, DFS 54.7% vs 71.8%, both p < 0.001), but similar for unplanned and planned low-HP. In multivariable analysis, unplanned and planned low-HP were not associated with LR or DFS, but R1 resection was (HR 6.6 (4.1-10.6), HR 3.0 (2.2-4.0), respectively). In R1 resections, the distal margin was more often involved after low-HP (70.0% vs 28.6%, p = 0.013) compared to rLAR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Poor outcomes in univariable analysis after low-HP appear to be associated with more challenging procedures and increased risk of involved resection margin rather than the low-HP itself. In case of expected difficulties, an extralevator abdominoperineal excision or referral to an expert center might be an alternative to improve resection margins.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05539417, retrospectively registered on September 16, 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12678588/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145589648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-23DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03230-3
Asmaa Sulaiman, Anders Dige, Andreas Hurup Nordholm, Lilli Lundby
Background: Chronic anal fissures in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) remain a significant therapeutic challenge, particularly when linked to active perianal disease. Conventional treatments often fail, highlighting the need for alternative approaches. This study explores the efficacy and safety of freshly collected autologous adipose tissue injection (AATI) for treating chronic fissures in patients with CD.
Methods: Nine patients with CD with anal fissures were included. The primary outcome was complete healing (CH) at 3 months after last AATI, defined as full fissure re-epithelialization and complete pain relief. Secondary outcomes included changes in defecation pain (visual analog scale [VAS]), anal discomfort (VAS), Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI), and St. Mark's Incontinence Score (SMIS).
Results: Five patients (56%) achieved CH after one (n = 4) or two (n = 1) AATI. Partial healing was observed in four patients (44%). Defecation pain improved from a VAS score of 7.5 (IQR 5.0-8.5) to 2.75 (0.0-4.5; p = 0.009), anal discomfort from VAS score of median 5.0 (2.5-6.5) to 1.0 (0.0-2.5; p = 0.014), PDAI from 5.0 (3.0-6.0) to 1.0 (1.0-2.0; p = 0.022), and SMIS from 7.0 (4.0-9.0) to 4.0 (0.0-4.0; p = 0.041). No treatment-related complications occurred.
Conclusion: AATI may be a promising new treatment of chronic anal fissures in patients with CD. Effects of AATI should be explored further in controlled trials.
{"title":"Treatment of chronic anal fissure in Crohn's disease patients with freshly collected autologous adipose tissue: a pilot study.","authors":"Asmaa Sulaiman, Anders Dige, Andreas Hurup Nordholm, Lilli Lundby","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03230-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03230-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic anal fissures in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) remain a significant therapeutic challenge, particularly when linked to active perianal disease. Conventional treatments often fail, highlighting the need for alternative approaches. This study explores the efficacy and safety of freshly collected autologous adipose tissue injection (AATI) for treating chronic fissures in patients with CD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine patients with CD with anal fissures were included. The primary outcome was complete healing (CH) at 3 months after last AATI, defined as full fissure re-epithelialization and complete pain relief. Secondary outcomes included changes in defecation pain (visual analog scale [VAS]), anal discomfort (VAS), Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI), and St. Mark's Incontinence Score (SMIS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five patients (56%) achieved CH after one (n = 4) or two (n = 1) AATI. Partial healing was observed in four patients (44%). Defecation pain improved from a VAS score of 7.5 (IQR 5.0-8.5) to 2.75 (0.0-4.5; p = 0.009), anal discomfort from VAS score of median 5.0 (2.5-6.5) to 1.0 (0.0-2.5; p = 0.014), PDAI from 5.0 (3.0-6.0) to 1.0 (1.0-2.0; p = 0.022), and SMIS from 7.0 (4.0-9.0) to 4.0 (0.0-4.0; p = 0.041). No treatment-related complications occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AATI may be a promising new treatment of chronic anal fissures in patients with CD. Effects of AATI should be explored further in controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":" ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12669252/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145589633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-15DOI: 10.1007/s10151-025-03234-z
Y Li, J Du, M Zhuang, G Hu, W Qiu, X Wang, J Tang
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) alone versus short-course radiotherapy combined with immunochemotherapy (SCRT + ICT) in patients with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) rectal cancer.
Methods: This study was designed as a single-center, retrospective, case-matched analysis conducted at a tertiary referral center. The patient cohort consisted of individuals diagnosed with pMMR rectal cancer between 2022 and 2024. The main outcome measures evaluated were pathological complete response (pCR) rate, anus preservation rate, neoadjuvant therapy-related adverse events, and surgery-related complications.
Results: In the final analysis, 46 pairs of patients were included. The SCRT + ICT group had a significantly higher pathological complete response (pCR) rate (47.8% versus 10.9%, P < 0.001) and anus preservation rate (84.8% versus 37.0%, P < 0.001), but also a higher temporary stoma rate (76.1% versus 21.7%, P < 0.001). Both groups achieved a 100% R0 resection rate. Regarding safety, the combined therapy group had lower intraoperative blood loss (20 ml versus 50 ml, P < 0.001) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (6 days versus 8 days, P < 0.001). Adverse events and postoperative complications were similar in both groups. Additionally, logistic regression analysis showed that SCRT + ICT is a protective factor for achieving postoperative pCR, while intraoperative blood loss ≥ 50 ml and elevated pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels are risk factors for postoperative pCR.
Conclusions: Short-course radiotherapy combined with immunochemotherapy is safe and effective for patients with pMMR rectal cancer.
背景:本研究的目的是比较新辅助放化疗(NCRT)与短程放疗联合免疫化疗(SCRT + ICT)对熟练错配修复(pMMR)直肠癌患者围手术期的疗效和安全性。方法:本研究设计为单中心、回顾性、病例匹配分析,在三级转诊中心进行。该患者队列由2022年至2024年间诊断为pMMR直肠癌的个体组成。评估的主要结果指标为病理完全缓解率(pCR)、肛门保留率、新辅助治疗相关不良事件和手术相关并发症。结果:最终纳入46对患者。SCRT + ICT组病理完全缓解(pCR)率(47.8% vs 10.9%)显著高于对照组(P < 0.05)。结论:短期放疗联合免疫化疗治疗pMMR直肠癌安全有效。
{"title":"Perioperative efficacy and safety of short-course radiotherapy combined with immunochemotherapy in proficient mismatch repair rectal cancer.","authors":"Y Li, J Du, M Zhuang, G Hu, W Qiu, X Wang, J Tang","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03234-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10151-025-03234-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) alone versus short-course radiotherapy combined with immunochemotherapy (SCRT + ICT) in patients with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was designed as a single-center, retrospective, case-matched analysis conducted at a tertiary referral center. The patient cohort consisted of individuals diagnosed with pMMR rectal cancer between 2022 and 2024. The main outcome measures evaluated were pathological complete response (pCR) rate, anus preservation rate, neoadjuvant therapy-related adverse events, and surgery-related complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the final analysis, 46 pairs of patients were included. The SCRT + ICT group had a significantly higher pathological complete response (pCR) rate (47.8% versus 10.9%, P < 0.001) and anus preservation rate (84.8% versus 37.0%, P < 0.001), but also a higher temporary stoma rate (76.1% versus 21.7%, P < 0.001). Both groups achieved a 100% R0 resection rate. Regarding safety, the combined therapy group had lower intraoperative blood loss (20 ml versus 50 ml, P < 0.001) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (6 days versus 8 days, P < 0.001). Adverse events and postoperative complications were similar in both groups. Additionally, logistic regression analysis showed that SCRT + ICT is a protective factor for achieving postoperative pCR, while intraoperative blood loss ≥ 50 ml and elevated pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels are risk factors for postoperative pCR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Short-course radiotherapy combined with immunochemotherapy is safe and effective for patients with pMMR rectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"29 1","pages":"190"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12619770/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145524587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}