The Safety and Efficacy of inactivated COVID-19 vaccination in couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology: A prospective cohort study.

Vaccine Pub Date : 2025-01-25 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126635
Juan Yang, Ying-Ling Yao, Xing-Yu Lv, Li-Hong Geng, Yue Wang, Enoch Appiah Adu-Gyamfi, Xue-Jiao Wang, Yue Qian, Ming-Xing Chen, Zhao-Hui Zhong, Ren-Yan Li, Qi Wan, Yu-Bin Ding
{"title":"The Safety and Efficacy of inactivated COVID-19 vaccination in couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology: A prospective cohort study.","authors":"Juan Yang, Ying-Ling Yao, Xing-Yu Lv, Li-Hong Geng, Yue Wang, Enoch Appiah Adu-Gyamfi, Xue-Jiao Wang, Yue Qian, Ming-Xing Chen, Zhao-Hui Zhong, Ren-Yan Li, Qi Wan, Yu-Bin Ding","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The safety of the COVID-19 inactivated vaccine on pregnancy outcomes in couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology remains uncertain due to limited and speculative evidence. Existing studies primarily focus on the vaccination status of females, with scant information available regarding the vaccination status of male partners. Moreover, there is minimal research tracking live birth outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective(s): </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 inactivated vaccine administration on the outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles in infertile couples in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study involved couples undergoing IVF treatment at Sichuan Jinxin Xinan Women & Children's Hospital from August 2021 to September 2022. Based on whether they received vaccination before ovarian stimulation, the couples were divided into the vaccination group and the non-vaccination group. We compared the laboratory parameters and pregnancy outcomes between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After performing propensity score matching (PSM), we observed similar live birth rates (41.23% vs. 44.08%, P = 0.555), clinical pregnancy rates (52.61% vs. 54.98%, P = 0.625), biochemical pregnancy (62.56% vs. 63.98%, P = 0.762), and ongoing pregnancy rates (49.76% vs. 51.18%, P = 0.770) between the vaccinated and unvaccinated women. Also, no significant disparities were found in terms of embryo development and laboratory parameters between the groups. Moreover, male vaccination had no impact on patients' pregnancy outcomes in assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments (all P > 0.05). Additionally, there were no observable effects of vaccination on embryo development and pregnancy outcomes among couples undergoing ART (all P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>The findings suggest that COVID-19 vaccination did not have a significant effect on patients undergoing IVF/ICSI with fresh embryo transfer. Therefore, it is recommended that couples should receive COVID-19 vaccination as scheduled to help mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":94264,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"45 ","pages":"126635"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The safety of the COVID-19 inactivated vaccine on pregnancy outcomes in couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology remains uncertain due to limited and speculative evidence. Existing studies primarily focus on the vaccination status of females, with scant information available regarding the vaccination status of male partners. Moreover, there is minimal research tracking live birth outcomes.

Objective(s): The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 inactivated vaccine administration on the outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles in infertile couples in China.

Methods: This prospective cohort study involved couples undergoing IVF treatment at Sichuan Jinxin Xinan Women & Children's Hospital from August 2021 to September 2022. Based on whether they received vaccination before ovarian stimulation, the couples were divided into the vaccination group and the non-vaccination group. We compared the laboratory parameters and pregnancy outcomes between the two groups.

Results: After performing propensity score matching (PSM), we observed similar live birth rates (41.23% vs. 44.08%, P = 0.555), clinical pregnancy rates (52.61% vs. 54.98%, P = 0.625), biochemical pregnancy (62.56% vs. 63.98%, P = 0.762), and ongoing pregnancy rates (49.76% vs. 51.18%, P = 0.770) between the vaccinated and unvaccinated women. Also, no significant disparities were found in terms of embryo development and laboratory parameters between the groups. Moreover, male vaccination had no impact on patients' pregnancy outcomes in assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments (all P > 0.05). Additionally, there were no observable effects of vaccination on embryo development and pregnancy outcomes among couples undergoing ART (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion(s): The findings suggest that COVID-19 vaccination did not have a significant effect on patients undergoing IVF/ICSI with fresh embryo transfer. Therefore, it is recommended that couples should receive COVID-19 vaccination as scheduled to help mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辅助生殖技术夫妇接种COVID-19灭活疫苗的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性队列研究
背景:由于证据有限和推测性,COVID-19灭活疫苗对接受辅助生殖技术的夫妇妊娠结局的安全性仍不确定。现有的研究主要集中在女性的疫苗接种状况,关于男性伴侣的疫苗接种状况的信息很少。此外,对活产结果的跟踪研究很少。目的:本研究的目的是评估COVID-19灭活疫苗给药对中国不育夫妇体外受精(IVF)和胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)周期结果的影响。方法:本前瞻性队列研究纳入2021年8月至2022年9月在四川省金新新安妇幼医院接受体外受精治疗的夫妇。根据夫妇在卵巢刺激前是否接种疫苗分为接种组和未接种组。我们比较了两组的实验室参数和妊娠结局。结果:通过倾向评分匹配(PSM),我们观察到接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的妇女的活产率(41.23%比44.08%,P = 0.555)、临床妊娠率(52.61%比54.98%,P = 0.625)、生化妊娠率(62.56%比63.98%,P = 0.762)和持续妊娠率(49.76%比51.18%,P = 0.770)相似。此外,在胚胎发育和实验室参数方面,各组之间没有发现显著差异。此外,男性疫苗接种对辅助生殖技术(ART)治疗患者的妊娠结局没有影响(均P < 0.05)。此外,接种疫苗对接受ART治疗的夫妇的胚胎发育和妊娠结局没有明显影响(P < 0.05)。结论:研究结果表明,接种COVID-19疫苗对接受新鲜胚胎移植的IVF/ICSI患者没有显著影响。因此,建议夫妇按计划接种COVID-19疫苗,以帮助缓解COVID-19大流行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A neuraminidase-based inactivated influenza virus vaccine significantly reduced virus replication and pathology following homologous challenge in swine. Vaccine safety surveillance in South Africa through COVID-19: A journey to systems strengthening. Comprehensive humoral and cellular immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination in adults with cancer. Predictors of HPV vaccination coverage among adolescents in Tennessee during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. Pseudovirus nanoparticles targeting the receptor binding HA1 domains of influenza viruses elicited high HA1-specific antibody responses and protected mice against mortality caused by influenza virus challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1