Marcos Alexandre dos Reis Cardillo , Leonardo Fenando Cruz Basso
{"title":"Revisiting knowledge on ESG/CSR and financial performance: A bibliometric and systematic review of moderating variables","authors":"Marcos Alexandre dos Reis Cardillo , Leonardo Fenando Cruz Basso","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2024.100648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study conducts a comprehensive bibliometric analysis and systematic review to investigate the moderating variables that influence the relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) measures, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) measures, and Corporate Financial Performance (CFP). Analyzing 108 articles from the Web of Science and Scopus databases published between 2019 and 2023, the study identifies key variables, influential studies, and methodological approaches within the ESG/CSR-CFP nexus. The findings reveal that moderating variables such as governance structures, cultural norms, technological readiness, market maturity, economic conditions, industry characteristics, firm strategy, and CSR engagement levels significantly impact the strength and direction of ESG and CSR effects on financial performance. However, the literature demonstrates considerable inconsistencies due to diverse research designs, varying definitions of ESG and CFP, and underrepresentation of moderating variables such as social and cultural factors, technological readiness, and firm-specific characteristics. The study highlights the need for more standardized variables, advanced research methodologies, and a broader exploration of these underexamined moderating variables to develop a more nuanced understanding of how ESG and CSR initiatives influence corporate financial outcomes. This work provides a framework for future research to address these gaps, enhancing the academic discourse on corporate sustainability and financial performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"10 1","pages":"Article 100648"},"PeriodicalIF":15.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X24001872","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study conducts a comprehensive bibliometric analysis and systematic review to investigate the moderating variables that influence the relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) measures, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) measures, and Corporate Financial Performance (CFP). Analyzing 108 articles from the Web of Science and Scopus databases published between 2019 and 2023, the study identifies key variables, influential studies, and methodological approaches within the ESG/CSR-CFP nexus. The findings reveal that moderating variables such as governance structures, cultural norms, technological readiness, market maturity, economic conditions, industry characteristics, firm strategy, and CSR engagement levels significantly impact the strength and direction of ESG and CSR effects on financial performance. However, the literature demonstrates considerable inconsistencies due to diverse research designs, varying definitions of ESG and CFP, and underrepresentation of moderating variables such as social and cultural factors, technological readiness, and firm-specific characteristics. The study highlights the need for more standardized variables, advanced research methodologies, and a broader exploration of these underexamined moderating variables to develop a more nuanced understanding of how ESG and CSR initiatives influence corporate financial outcomes. This work provides a framework for future research to address these gaps, enhancing the academic discourse on corporate sustainability and financial performance.
本文通过文献计量分析和系统回顾,探讨了影响环境、社会和治理(ESG)指标、企业社会责任(CSR)指标和企业财务绩效(CFP)之间关系的调节变量。该研究分析了2019年至2023年间发表在Web of Science和Scopus数据库中的108篇文章,确定了ESG/CSR-CFP关系中的关键变量、有影响力的研究和方法方法。研究发现,治理结构、文化规范、技术成熟度、市场成熟度、经济条件、行业特征、企业战略和企业社会责任参与水平等调节变量显著影响了企业社会责任对财务绩效的影响力度和方向。然而,由于不同的研究设计、不同的ESG和CFP定义,以及对社会和文化因素、技术准备程度和企业特定特征等调节变量的代表性不足,文献显示出相当大的不一致性。该研究强调需要更多标准化的变量、先进的研究方法,以及对这些未被充分审视的调节变量进行更广泛的探索,以更细致地了解ESG和CSR举措如何影响企业财务结果。这项工作为未来的研究提供了一个框架,以解决这些差距,加强对企业可持续发展和财务绩效的学术论述。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices.
JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience.
In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.