A commentary on Duan et al.: RNR’s luster remains

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Experimental Criminology Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1007/s11292-024-09654-5
James Bonta, Paul Gendreau
{"title":"A commentary on Duan et al.: RNR’s luster remains","authors":"James Bonta, Paul Gendreau","doi":"10.1007/s11292-024-09654-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives </h3><p>Duan et al. (2024) published a meta-analysis in this journal claiming that the risk-need-responsivity principles are not “golden”.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We challenge their conclusion by pointing out some major errors in their literature search and classification of studies.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results </h3><p>Central to our argument is that Duan and his colleagues incorrectly identified a significant number of RNR studies as non-RNR. Consequently, their results led to an incorrect conclusion.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Our re-analysis of their data finds that the RNR principles remain highly relevant to the rehabilitation field.</p>","PeriodicalId":47684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Criminology","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-024-09654-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives 

Duan et al. (2024) published a meta-analysis in this journal claiming that the risk-need-responsivity principles are not “golden”.

Methods

We challenge their conclusion by pointing out some major errors in their literature search and classification of studies.

Results 

Central to our argument is that Duan and his colleagues incorrectly identified a significant number of RNR studies as non-RNR. Consequently, their results led to an incorrect conclusion.

Conclusion

Our re-analysis of their data finds that the RNR principles remain highly relevant to the rehabilitation field.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对Duan等人的评论:RNR的光彩依然存在
Duan等人(2024)在该杂志上发表了一篇荟萃分析,声称风险-需求-反应原则并非“黄金”原则。方法对他们的结论提出质疑,指出他们在文献检索和研究分类上的一些主要错误。我们的论点的核心是Duan和他的同事错误地将大量RNR研究识别为非RNR。因此,他们的结果导致了一个错误的结论。结论我们重新分析了他们的数据,发现RNR原则在康复领域仍然具有很高的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Criminology
Journal of Experimental Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Criminology focuses on high quality experimental and quasi-experimental research in the advancement of criminological theory and/or the development of evidence based crime and justice policy. The journal is also committed to the advancement of the science of systematic reviews and experimental methods in criminology and criminal justice. The journal seeks empirical papers on experimental and quasi-experimental studies, systematic reviews on substantive criminological and criminal justice issues, and methodological papers on experimentation and systematic review. The journal encourages submissions from scholars in the broad array of scientific disciplines that are concerned with criminology as well as crime and justice problems.
期刊最新文献
The effect of pre-release treatment with injectable naltrexone on criminal justice and substance use outcomes: Results from a randomized controlled trial Framing the harms of wrongful convictions: how different narratives shape public opinion Now you see it, now you don’t: social systematic observation of physical disorder using Google Street View An experimental study on the effect of prosecutorial Brady violations on confidence in exonerating individuals wrongfully convicted of murder Analyzing the impacts of race, addiction, drug type, and criminal record on public support for criminalized and medicalized sentencing approaches toward illegal drug use
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1