Insufficient space: Prioritizing large tree species and planting designs still fail to meet urban forest canopy targets

IF 7.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Landscape and Urban Planning Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105287
Paticia Rettondini Torquato, Christopher Szota, Amy K. Hahs, Stefan K. Arndt, Stephen J. Livesley
{"title":"Insufficient space: Prioritizing large tree species and planting designs still fail to meet urban forest canopy targets","authors":"Paticia Rettondini Torquato, Christopher Szota, Amy K. Hahs, Stefan K. Arndt, Stephen J. Livesley","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The benefits associated with urban forests have led municipalities to set ambitious canopy cover targets to be achieved over the next few decades. Identifying tree species and planting strategies that can achieve these targets is crucial. We applied species-specific tree crown growth models for 20 species commonly planted in Melbourne, Australia to simulate canopy cover increase in newly developed residential suburb over 30 years (2025–2055). Tree species selection and planting strategies were simulated under high and low rainfall. The default strategy represented current tree species selection and planting practices. The two alternative strategies i) occupied all available street planting spaces prioritizing the planting of large crown species at maturity, and ii) occupied all available street planting spaces, maximizing the number of trees planted. Both the default strategy and maximising the number of trees planted achieved 11–15 % canopy cover after 30 years. Prioritising planting trees with large crowns at maturity achieved 16–22 % canopy cover after 30 years. Low rainfall reduced canopy cover in all scenarios by 4–6 %. Increasing the number of species with a large crown at maturity will likely achieve higher canopy cover. However, canopy cover targets will be difficult to achieve unless tree planting on private property increases.","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105287","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The benefits associated with urban forests have led municipalities to set ambitious canopy cover targets to be achieved over the next few decades. Identifying tree species and planting strategies that can achieve these targets is crucial. We applied species-specific tree crown growth models for 20 species commonly planted in Melbourne, Australia to simulate canopy cover increase in newly developed residential suburb over 30 years (2025–2055). Tree species selection and planting strategies were simulated under high and low rainfall. The default strategy represented current tree species selection and planting practices. The two alternative strategies i) occupied all available street planting spaces prioritizing the planting of large crown species at maturity, and ii) occupied all available street planting spaces, maximizing the number of trees planted. Both the default strategy and maximising the number of trees planted achieved 11–15 % canopy cover after 30 years. Prioritising planting trees with large crowns at maturity achieved 16–22 % canopy cover after 30 years. Low rainfall reduced canopy cover in all scenarios by 4–6 %. Increasing the number of species with a large crown at maturity will likely achieve higher canopy cover. However, canopy cover targets will be difficult to achieve unless tree planting on private property increases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
空间不足:优先考虑大型树种和种植设计仍然不能满足城市森林冠层的目标
城市森林带来的好处促使市政当局制定了雄心勃勃的林冠覆盖目标,希望在未来几十年内实现。确定能够实现这些目标的树种和种植策略至关重要。本文以澳大利亚墨尔本20种常见树种为研究对象,应用树种特异性树冠生长模型,模拟了30年(2025-2055年)新开发住宅郊区冠层盖度的增长。模拟了高、低降雨条件下的树种选择和种植策略。默认策略代表了当前的树种选择和种植实践。两种策略:(1)占据所有可用的街道种植空间,优先种植成熟的大型冠状树种;(2)占据所有可用的街道种植空间,最大限度地增加树木的种植数量。默认策略和最大化树木种植数量在30年后都实现了11 - 15%的树冠覆盖率。优先种植成熟期树冠大的树木,30年后树冠覆盖率达到16 - 22%。低降雨量使所有情景下的冠层盖度减少4 - 6%。增加成熟期大冠的物种数量可能会获得更高的冠层覆盖。然而,除非增加在私人土地上植树,否则很难达到树冠覆盖的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape and Urban Planning
Landscape and Urban Planning 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.
期刊最新文献
Assessing accessibility and crowding in urban green spaces: A comparative study of approaches Planning for transformative change with nature-based solutions: A geodesign application in Stockholm Greening the city: An analysis of socio-spatial disparities through urban gardening practices in Lille and Lyon (France) Monitoring sustainability of urban agriculture: Who is going to do it and how? Effects of urbanisation, habitat characteristics, and management on garden pond biodiversity: Findings from a large-scale citizen science survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1