Partition actions on forestland owned as heir property and the determinants of court decisions

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS Forest Policy and Economics Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103392
Mahesh Tiwari, Changyou Sun, Donald L. Grebner, Ayoung Kim, Eric McConnell
{"title":"Partition actions on forestland owned as heir property and the determinants of court decisions","authors":"Mahesh Tiwari, Changyou Sun, Donald L. Grebner, Ayoung Kim, Eric McConnell","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, family forest landowners own a substantial portion of the forestland. Some of the forestland is heir property, which is created when an owner dies without a will or with a defective will. Each co-owner of heir property has an undivided fractional interest in the entire land, and any co-owners can file a partition action to isolate their interest from the land. While a physical division of the land is possible, a partition action often results in a forced sale of the entire land and unwilling loss of land for some co-owners. In this study, published legal cases were utilized to collect empirical evidence of heir property partition on forestland, and furthermore, logit models were employed to examine the determinants of court decisions. The analyses identified several influential factors behind judges' decisions. These included whether incomes from forestland were shared among co-owners, the magnitude of fractional interest of a partition claimant, the presence of absentee co-owners, the physical and financial work related to the land, and the availability of detailed facts about heirs and land. The empirical findings have implications for heir property owners to administer their properties, institutions to design legal strategies for partition disputes, and policymakers to address and improve the legal framework encompassing heir property and its partition.","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103392","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the United States, family forest landowners own a substantial portion of the forestland. Some of the forestland is heir property, which is created when an owner dies without a will or with a defective will. Each co-owner of heir property has an undivided fractional interest in the entire land, and any co-owners can file a partition action to isolate their interest from the land. While a physical division of the land is possible, a partition action often results in a forced sale of the entire land and unwilling loss of land for some co-owners. In this study, published legal cases were utilized to collect empirical evidence of heir property partition on forestland, and furthermore, logit models were employed to examine the determinants of court decisions. The analyses identified several influential factors behind judges' decisions. These included whether incomes from forestland were shared among co-owners, the magnitude of fractional interest of a partition claimant, the presence of absentee co-owners, the physical and financial work related to the land, and the availability of detailed facts about heirs and land. The empirical findings have implications for heir property owners to administer their properties, institutions to design legal strategies for partition disputes, and policymakers to address and improve the legal framework encompassing heir property and its partition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
继承人林地分割诉讼与法院判决的决定因素
在美国,家庭森林土地所有者拥有很大一部分林地。一些林地是继承人的财产,当所有者在没有遗嘱或遗嘱有缺陷的情况下死亡时,就会产生继承人的财产。继承人财产的每个共同所有人对整个土地拥有不可分割的部分权益,任何共同所有人都可以提起分割诉讼,将他们的利益与土地隔离开来。虽然实际分割土地是可能的,但分割行动往往导致整个土地被强制出售,一些共有人不愿失去土地。本研究利用已发表的法律案例收集林地继承人财产分割的经验证据,并运用logit模型考察法院判决的决定因素。这些分析确定了法官判决背后的几个影响因素。这些因素包括:来自林地的收入是否在共有人之间共享,分割者的部分权益的大小,缺席的共有人的存在,与土地相关的物质和财务工作,以及关于继承人和土地的详细事实的可用性。实证研究结果对继承人财产所有者如何管理其财产、机构如何设计分割纠纷的法律策略、政策制定者如何解决和完善涉及继承人财产及其分割的法律框架具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
Misalignment between ecologically rapid and economically optimal forest restoration designs Implications of China's foreign waste ban on the global waste paper trade networks for circular economy and sustainability Becoming a forester. Exploring forest management students' habitus in the making Three decades of forest policy studies in the countries in the former socialist countries of Europe: A review Enhancing actor-centered power theory through actor typology: Insights from community-based conservation in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1