Incidence of venous thromboembolism in fracture below the knee with and without chemical thromboprophylaxis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1007/s00402-024-05675-x
John T. Riehl, Noah J. Embry, Daniel G. Zeter, Cornelis J. Potgieter, McKenna W. Box
{"title":"Incidence of venous thromboembolism in fracture below the knee with and without chemical thromboprophylaxis: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"John T. Riehl,&nbsp;Noah J. Embry,&nbsp;Daniel G. Zeter,&nbsp;Cornelis J. Potgieter,&nbsp;McKenna W. Box","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05675-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Low rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) have been found in patients with isolated orthopaedic trauma below the knee. Many surgeons routinely provide chemical thromboprophylaxis in these injuries, however. This is not without inherent risks, and this remains a controversial topic in perioperative care in orthopaedic trauma. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to look at rates of VTE in patients with isolated orthopaedic fractures below the knee, grouped by whether they received chemical prophylaxis versus no chemical prophylaxis.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review was performed comparing VTE with and without chemical thromboprophylaxis following isolated orthopaedic fracture below the knee. A chi-square analysis was then performed on data including patients who received chemical prophylaxis versus those who did not from all 25 included articles. The articles were grouped according to type of study, such as observational versus randomized controlled trial (RCT), and then further subdivided according to surgical intervention status, and whether routine screening for thromboembolism was utilized to diagnose. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the ROBINS-I criteria for cohort studies and the Cochrane RoB 2 tool for randomized controlled trials. A random effects pooled logistic regression and Fisher’s exact tests were then performed.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>222,188 patients were found from 25 articles. Chemical prophylaxis was given to 8,666 patients, and VTE was reported in 347 cases (4.0%). 213,522 patients did not receive chemical prophylaxis, and VTE was reported in 2,185 (1.02%) (χ<sup>2</sup> (1, n = 222,188) = 656.8, p &lt; .00001). Pooled logistic regression revealed that patients receiving prophylaxis were 0.5 times less likely to develop VTE. With a calculated population baseline risk of 1.5% for developing VTE, the number needed to treat (NNT) with chemical prophylaxis is 134 to prevent 1 VTE after fracture below the knee.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In patients with isolated orthopaedic trauma below the knee, indiscriminate use of chemical VTE prophylaxis is not recommended due to the lack of significant benefit and high NNT.</p><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level III.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-024-05675-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Low rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) have been found in patients with isolated orthopaedic trauma below the knee. Many surgeons routinely provide chemical thromboprophylaxis in these injuries, however. This is not without inherent risks, and this remains a controversial topic in perioperative care in orthopaedic trauma. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to look at rates of VTE in patients with isolated orthopaedic fractures below the knee, grouped by whether they received chemical prophylaxis versus no chemical prophylaxis.

Methods

A systematic review was performed comparing VTE with and without chemical thromboprophylaxis following isolated orthopaedic fracture below the knee. A chi-square analysis was then performed on data including patients who received chemical prophylaxis versus those who did not from all 25 included articles. The articles were grouped according to type of study, such as observational versus randomized controlled trial (RCT), and then further subdivided according to surgical intervention status, and whether routine screening for thromboembolism was utilized to diagnose. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the ROBINS-I criteria for cohort studies and the Cochrane RoB 2 tool for randomized controlled trials. A random effects pooled logistic regression and Fisher’s exact tests were then performed.

Results

222,188 patients were found from 25 articles. Chemical prophylaxis was given to 8,666 patients, and VTE was reported in 347 cases (4.0%). 213,522 patients did not receive chemical prophylaxis, and VTE was reported in 2,185 (1.02%) (χ2 (1, n = 222,188) = 656.8, p < .00001). Pooled logistic regression revealed that patients receiving prophylaxis were 0.5 times less likely to develop VTE. With a calculated population baseline risk of 1.5% for developing VTE, the number needed to treat (NNT) with chemical prophylaxis is 134 to prevent 1 VTE after fracture below the knee.

Conclusions

In patients with isolated orthopaedic trauma below the knee, indiscriminate use of chemical VTE prophylaxis is not recommended due to the lack of significant benefit and high NNT.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
期刊最新文献
Bipolar vs. monopolar sealer in decreasing blood loss and transfusion rate in patients undergoing two-stage exchange in infected total knee arthroplasty: propensity score-matched study. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcome after proximal hamstring tendon repair at mean 3 years follow-up. Scapho-metacarpal dual mobility prosthesis for TMC-1 joint salvage: technical insights. The single antegrade sling graft: a novel hamstring autograft technique for combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Total joint arthroplasty of the thumb CMC joint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1