Institution of a formal multidisciplinary heart team for high-risk coronary revascularization.

Q3 Medicine Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings Pub Date : 2024-11-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/08998280.2024.2426925
Srinivasa Potluri, Rahul Sawhney, Cody Dorton, Kyle McCullough, Ghadi Moubarak, Emily Shih, Jared Christensen, J Michael DiMaio, Karim Al-Azizi, Chadi Dib, Sameh Sayfo, Molly Szerlip, Sibi Thomas, Alfred Levy, Kelly Hutcheson, Melissa Carranza, Samantha Douthit, Trent Pettijohn, William Ryan, Michael Mack
{"title":"Institution of a formal multidisciplinary heart team for high-risk coronary revascularization.","authors":"Srinivasa Potluri, Rahul Sawhney, Cody Dorton, Kyle McCullough, Ghadi Moubarak, Emily Shih, Jared Christensen, J Michael DiMaio, Karim Al-Azizi, Chadi Dib, Sameh Sayfo, Molly Szerlip, Sibi Thomas, Alfred Levy, Kelly Hutcheson, Melissa Carranza, Samantha Douthit, Trent Pettijohn, William Ryan, Michael Mack","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2024.2426925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The heart team approach is now the standard of care for patients with complex coronary artery disease; however, the definition of a heart team is variable. We embarked on a project to create an extended, multidisciplinary heart team to evaluate patients we deemed high risk for coronary revascularization. In doing so, we created a new service, workflow, and paradigm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Herein, we describe the process through which we created our high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention team, our criteria for determining risk, our process for evaluating these patients, and quality assurance. Additionally, we describe the design of our prospective study assessing 200 patients with complex coronary artery disease. The primary outcomes include the final heart team revascularization decision, all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac events, acute kidney injury, postintervention bleeding, and length of stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Establishing a multidisciplinary heart team may help with complex and high-risk patient and family scenarios and potentially improve patient outcomes. A study has been initiated to test this hypothesis formally.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"38 1","pages":"28-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11657062/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2024.2426925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The heart team approach is now the standard of care for patients with complex coronary artery disease; however, the definition of a heart team is variable. We embarked on a project to create an extended, multidisciplinary heart team to evaluate patients we deemed high risk for coronary revascularization. In doing so, we created a new service, workflow, and paradigm.

Methods: Herein, we describe the process through which we created our high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention team, our criteria for determining risk, our process for evaluating these patients, and quality assurance. Additionally, we describe the design of our prospective study assessing 200 patients with complex coronary artery disease. The primary outcomes include the final heart team revascularization decision, all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac events, acute kidney injury, postintervention bleeding, and length of stay.

Conclusion: Establishing a multidisciplinary heart team may help with complex and high-risk patient and family scenarios and potentially improve patient outcomes. A study has been initiated to test this hypothesis formally.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立一个正式的多学科心脏小组来治疗高危冠状动脉血管重建术。
导读:心脏小组方法现在是复杂冠状动脉疾病患者的标准护理;然而,心脏小组的定义是可变的。我们开始了一个项目,创建一个扩展的,多学科的心脏团队来评估我们认为有冠状动脉血管重建术高风险的病人。在这样做的过程中,我们创建了一个新的服务、工作流和范式。方法:在本文中,我们描述了我们创建高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗团队的过程,我们确定风险的标准,我们评估这些患者的过程,以及质量保证。此外,我们描述了对200例复杂冠状动脉疾病患者进行前瞻性研究的设计。主要结局包括最终的心脏小组血运重建决定、全因死亡率、主要心脏不良事件、急性肾损伤、干预后出血和住院时间。结论:建立一个多学科的心脏团队可能有助于处理复杂和高风险的患者和家庭情况,并有可能改善患者的预后。一项研究已经开始正式验证这一假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
期刊最新文献
Herpes zoster ophthalmicus temporally after COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review of uncontrolled case reports and case series. Prevalence of Kaposi sarcoma in the United States: SEER cross-sectional study. Institution of a formal multidisciplinary heart team for high-risk coronary revascularization. Barriers to guideline implementation. Avocations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1