Optimism and pessimism: a concept for behavioural ecology.

IF 11 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY Biological Reviews Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1111/brv.13178
Viktoria Siewert, Sylvia Kaiser, Norbert Sachser, S Helene Richter
{"title":"Optimism and pessimism: a concept for behavioural ecology.","authors":"Viktoria Siewert, Sylvia Kaiser, Norbert Sachser, S Helene Richter","doi":"10.1111/brv.13178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Originating from human psychology, the concepts of \"optimism\" and \"pessimism\" were transferred to animal welfare science about 20 years ago to study emotional states in non-human animals. Over time, \"optimism\" and \"pessimism\" have developed into valuable welfare indicators, but little focus has been put on the ecological implications of this concept. Here, we aim to bridge this gap and underline the great potential for transferring it to behavioural ecology. We start by outlining why \"optimism\" and \"pessimism\" can be considered as aspects of animal personalities. Furthermore, we argue that considering \"optimism\"/\"pessimism\" in a behavioural ecology context can facilitate our understanding of individual adjustment to the environment. Specifically, we show how variation in \"optimism\"/\"pessimism\" can play a crucial role in adaptation processes to environmental heterogeneity, for example, niche choice and niche conformance. Building on these considerations, we hypothesise that \"optimists\" might be less plastic than \"pessimists\" in their behaviour, which could considerably affect the way they adjust to environmental change.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.13178","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Originating from human psychology, the concepts of "optimism" and "pessimism" were transferred to animal welfare science about 20 years ago to study emotional states in non-human animals. Over time, "optimism" and "pessimism" have developed into valuable welfare indicators, but little focus has been put on the ecological implications of this concept. Here, we aim to bridge this gap and underline the great potential for transferring it to behavioural ecology. We start by outlining why "optimism" and "pessimism" can be considered as aspects of animal personalities. Furthermore, we argue that considering "optimism"/"pessimism" in a behavioural ecology context can facilitate our understanding of individual adjustment to the environment. Specifically, we show how variation in "optimism"/"pessimism" can play a crucial role in adaptation processes to environmental heterogeneity, for example, niche choice and niche conformance. Building on these considerations, we hypothesise that "optimists" might be less plastic than "pessimists" in their behaviour, which could considerably affect the way they adjust to environmental change.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乐观与悲观:行为生态学的一个概念。
“乐观”和“悲观”的概念起源于人类心理学,大约在20年前被转移到动物福利科学中,用于研究非人类动物的情绪状态。随着时间的推移,“乐观”和“悲观”已经发展成为有价值的福利指标,但很少有人关注这一概念的生态含义。在这里,我们的目标是弥合这一差距,并强调将其转移到行为生态学的巨大潜力。我们首先概述为什么“乐观”和“悲观”可以被认为是动物个性的一个方面。此外,我们认为,在行为生态学背景下考虑“乐观”/“悲观”可以促进我们对个体适应环境的理解。具体来说,我们展示了“乐观”/“悲观”的变化如何在适应环境异质性的过程中发挥关键作用,例如,生态位选择和生态位一致性。基于这些考虑,我们假设“乐观主义者”的行为可能比“悲观主义者”更具可塑性,这可能会在很大程度上影响他们适应环境变化的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Reviews
Biological Reviews 生物-生物学
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly. The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions. The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field. Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.
期刊最新文献
The role of host plants in driving pathogen susceptibility in insects through chemicals, immune responses and microbiota. Climate-related drivers of migratory bird health in the south-central USA. Revisiting concepts of thermal physiology: understanding negative feedback and set-point in mammals, birds, and lizards. Type 4 plant metallothioneins - players in zinc biofortification? Closing the air gap: the use of drones for studying wildlife ecophysiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1