Kristina Kudelko, Yon K Sung, Corey E Ventetuolo, Steven Kawut, Jeremy A Mazurek, Dana McGlothlin, Tim Lahm, Aaron Waxman, Roham Zamanian
{"title":"National Consortium on Pulmonary Vascular Disease Fellowship Training Summary.","authors":"Kristina Kudelko, Yon K Sung, Corey E Ventetuolo, Steven Kawut, Jeremy A Mazurek, Dana McGlothlin, Tim Lahm, Aaron Waxman, Roham Zamanian","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.11.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pulmonary vascular disease (PVD), and in particular, pulmonary hypertension (PH), is a highly specialized area of medicine comprising complex diagnostics, classification systems, risk assessment tools, and therapeutics, the correct application of which has been shown to impact patient outcomes. The PVD scientific and patient community recognizes the importance of standardization of care patterns and thus has implemented a clinical accreditation process for PH care centers across the United States. However, a similar standardization system is lacking in PVD subspecialty provider training. Non-Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education PVD advanced fellowships exist nationally, but do not provide a unified approach to trainee education. Therefore, first, a survey of all Pulmonary Hypertension Association-accredited center directors across the United States was performed to gauge interest in a standardized educational initiative in the field of PVD. Second, the National Consortium on Pulmonary Vascular Disease Fellowship Training was founded to establish a common curriculum and set of training requirements across PVD programs in the United States. A particular emphasis was placed on the training requirements for provider competency in PH because (1) reliable access to patients with PH could be supported by all consortium institutions and (2) the consortium members believed that national PH training curricula lacked standardization and detail. This article provides the results of the national survey, a guideline summary of the fellowship curriculum and training requirements, and a discussion of the impact of the consortium on PVD training and on the PVD subspecialty as a potential emerging formal discipline in internal medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":"1191-1203"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.11.044","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pulmonary vascular disease (PVD), and in particular, pulmonary hypertension (PH), is a highly specialized area of medicine comprising complex diagnostics, classification systems, risk assessment tools, and therapeutics, the correct application of which has been shown to impact patient outcomes. The PVD scientific and patient community recognizes the importance of standardization of care patterns and thus has implemented a clinical accreditation process for PH care centers across the United States. However, a similar standardization system is lacking in PVD subspecialty provider training. Non-Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education PVD advanced fellowships exist nationally, but do not provide a unified approach to trainee education. Therefore, first, a survey of all Pulmonary Hypertension Association-accredited center directors across the United States was performed to gauge interest in a standardized educational initiative in the field of PVD. Second, the National Consortium on Pulmonary Vascular Disease Fellowship Training was founded to establish a common curriculum and set of training requirements across PVD programs in the United States. A particular emphasis was placed on the training requirements for provider competency in PH because (1) reliable access to patients with PH could be supported by all consortium institutions and (2) the consortium members believed that national PH training curricula lacked standardization and detail. This article provides the results of the national survey, a guideline summary of the fellowship curriculum and training requirements, and a discussion of the impact of the consortium on PVD training and on the PVD subspecialty as a potential emerging formal discipline in internal medicine.
期刊介绍:
At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.