Adolescent vs. Young Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis patients: how different are their two year postoperative radiographic and clinical outcomes?

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1007/s00586-024-08621-y
Alexandra C Dionne, Lawrence G Lenke, Fthimnir M Hassan, Chidebelum Nnake, Simon Blanchard, Justin L Reyes, Roy Miller, Joseph M Lombardi, Zeeshan M Sardar
{"title":"Adolescent vs. Young Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis patients: how different are their two year postoperative radiographic and clinical outcomes?","authors":"Alexandra C Dionne, Lawrence G Lenke, Fthimnir M Hassan, Chidebelum Nnake, Simon Blanchard, Justin L Reyes, Roy Miller, Joseph M Lombardi, Zeeshan M Sardar","doi":"10.1007/s00586-024-08621-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the long-term outcomes among AIS (10-18 years) and young AdIS (YAdIS) (19-40 years) patients with minimum 2 year follow up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of AIS and YAdIS patients who underwent primary corrective surgery at a single center was conducted. Demographic, radiographic, operative data, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the ODI and SRS-22r, and long-term complications were collected. A 1:1 propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was implemented to limit selection bias by controlling for gender, curve type, total instrumented levels (TIL), and main coronal cobb angle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>95 patients (60 AIS, 35 YAdIS) were identified. Following PSM, 27 matched pairs were identified. AIS patients had greater LL (-55.6 ± 14.0 vs. -61.8 ± 11.7, p = 0.0486) at preop, less OR time (4.7 ± 1.2 h vs. 5.2 ± 1.5 h, p = 0.0468), intraoperative transfusion rates (70.4% vs. 96.3%, p = 0.0082), and postop Hb (9.0 ± 1.9 vs. 10.1 ± 1.4, p = 0.0280) and Hct (26.4 ± 5.4 vs. 29.7 ± 3.7, p = 0.0453). YAdIS patients had greater T2-T12 TK (42.7 ± 13.6 vs. 36.3 ± 11.0, p = 0.0412), T2-T5 TK (19.4 ± 9.4 vs. 13.3 ± 8.7, p = 0.0187), and TPA (12.4 ± 7.9 vs. 7.4 ± 8.9, p = 0.0200). There were no significant differences in baseline and 2 year follow up PROMs and in the rates of 2 year complications, including proximal/distal junctional kyphosis (PJK/DJK), pseudarthrosis, rod fracture, curve progression, and revision (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite differences in operative characteristics, idiopathic scoliosis (IS) patients who underwent corrective surgery at a younger age had comparable PROMs and 2 year outcomes to older patients. Corrective fusion surgery is safe and effective in both adolescents and young adults and may avoid the higher complication rates seen in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"625-634"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08621-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the long-term outcomes among AIS (10-18 years) and young AdIS (YAdIS) (19-40 years) patients with minimum 2 year follow up.

Methods: A retrospective review of AIS and YAdIS patients who underwent primary corrective surgery at a single center was conducted. Demographic, radiographic, operative data, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the ODI and SRS-22r, and long-term complications were collected. A 1:1 propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was implemented to limit selection bias by controlling for gender, curve type, total instrumented levels (TIL), and main coronal cobb angle.

Results: 95 patients (60 AIS, 35 YAdIS) were identified. Following PSM, 27 matched pairs were identified. AIS patients had greater LL (-55.6 ± 14.0 vs. -61.8 ± 11.7, p = 0.0486) at preop, less OR time (4.7 ± 1.2 h vs. 5.2 ± 1.5 h, p = 0.0468), intraoperative transfusion rates (70.4% vs. 96.3%, p = 0.0082), and postop Hb (9.0 ± 1.9 vs. 10.1 ± 1.4, p = 0.0280) and Hct (26.4 ± 5.4 vs. 29.7 ± 3.7, p = 0.0453). YAdIS patients had greater T2-T12 TK (42.7 ± 13.6 vs. 36.3 ± 11.0, p = 0.0412), T2-T5 TK (19.4 ± 9.4 vs. 13.3 ± 8.7, p = 0.0187), and TPA (12.4 ± 7.9 vs. 7.4 ± 8.9, p = 0.0200). There were no significant differences in baseline and 2 year follow up PROMs and in the rates of 2 year complications, including proximal/distal junctional kyphosis (PJK/DJK), pseudarthrosis, rod fracture, curve progression, and revision (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Despite differences in operative characteristics, idiopathic scoliosis (IS) patients who underwent corrective surgery at a younger age had comparable PROMs and 2 year outcomes to older patients. Corrective fusion surgery is safe and effective in both adolescents and young adults and may avoid the higher complication rates seen in older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年与青年特发性脊柱侧凸患者:他们术后两年的影像学和临床结果有何不同?
目的:比较AIS(10-18岁)和年轻AdIS (YAdIS)(19-40岁)患者至少2年随访的长期预后。方法:回顾性分析在同一中心接受初级矫正手术的AIS和YAdIS患者。收集人口统计学、放射学、手术资料、患者报告的预后指标(PROMs),包括ODI和SRS-22r,以及长期并发症。采用1:1倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析,通过控制性别、曲线类型、总仪器水平(TIL)和主冠状cobb角来限制选择偏差。结果:共确诊95例(AIS 60例,YAdIS 35例)。在PSM之后,鉴定出27对匹配的配对。AIS患者更会(-55.6±14.0和-61.8±11.7,p = 0.0486), preop少或时间(4.7±1.2 h和5.2±1.5 h, p = 0.0468),术中输血率(70.4%比96.3%,p = 0.0082), Hb和存在切口漏(9.0±1.9和10.1±1.4,p = 0.0280)和Hct(26.4±5.4和29.7±3.7,p = 0.0453)。雅迪患者大T2-T12 TK(42.7±13.6和36.3±11.0,p = 0.0412), T2-T5 TK(19.4±9.4和13.3±8.7,p = 0.0187),和TPA(12.4±7.9和7.4±8.9,p = 0.0200)。基线和2年随访PROMs以及2年并发症发生率无显著差异,包括近端/远端关节后凸(PJK/DJK)、假关节、棒状骨折、弯曲进展和翻修(p > 0.05)。结论:尽管手术特征存在差异,但年轻时接受矫正手术的特发性脊柱侧凸(IS)患者的PROMs和2年预后与老年患者相当。矫正融合手术对青少年和年轻人都是安全有效的,并且可以避免老年人较高的并发症发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
期刊最新文献
Differentiation of typical features between Fungal spondylitis and Brucellar spondylitis on CT and new applications of CT values in diagnosis of spinal infections. Improving the accuracy of current sagittal alignment evaluation system centered around pelvic incidence: a new machine-learning based classification. Risk factors for residual neuropathic pain using specific screening tools in postoperative patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. Evaluation of fracture lines in adolescent lumbar spondylolysis using MR bone imaging as an alternative to computed tomography. Correction to: ISSLS Prize in Clinical Science 2025: A randomized trial on three different minimally invasive decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis. Five years follow‑up from the NORDSTEN‑SST.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1