A potential inflammatory biomarker for advanced endometrial cancer treated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1111/jog.16182
Shintaro Yanazume, Yusuke Kobayashi, Yukari Kirita, Ikumi Kitazono, Chikako Nagata, Ayumi Kozai, Akihide Tanimoto, Hiroaki Kobayashi
{"title":"A potential inflammatory biomarker for advanced endometrial cancer treated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab","authors":"Shintaro Yanazume,&nbsp;Yusuke Kobayashi,&nbsp;Yukari Kirita,&nbsp;Ikumi Kitazono,&nbsp;Chikako Nagata,&nbsp;Ayumi Kozai,&nbsp;Akihide Tanimoto,&nbsp;Hiroaki Kobayashi","doi":"10.1111/jog.16182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>To identify prognostic biomarkers that could predict how well patients will respond to lenvatinib/pembrolizumab (LEN/PEM). The utility of certain inflammatory biomarkers in endometrial liquid-based cytology (LBC) or peripheral blood samples, such as neutrophil counts, lymphocyte counts, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were explored.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study included 25 patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer who had received LEN/PEM between August 2018 and March 2024. Predictors for overall response (OR), disease control, and progression-free survival, based on neutrophil/lymphocyte counts, NLR scores of the endometrial LBC prior to initial treatment, and peripheral blood prior to initial treatment and prior to LEM/PEM treatment were compared using a receiver operating characteristic curve. Significant predictors were evaluated using the log-rank test, and multivariate analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Although neutrophil counts and NLR score in endometrial LBC prior to initial treatment were better effective predictors for OR, the most accurate predictor of a progression-free status was NLR score in peripheral blood prior to LEM/PEM (0.722, 95% CI: 0.45–0.99, sensitivity: 57.1%, specificity: 94.4%). In peripheral blood prior to LEN/PEM, the lower NLR (NLR &lt;5.39) group had a significantly longer PFS than the higher NLR (5.39 ≤ NLR) group (<i>p</i> = 0.023, median survival: 13.5 vs. 3.0 months), and tended to be independently correlated with PFS (hazard ratio = 2.571; 95% CI = 0.857–7.719; <i>p</i> = 0.092).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Inflammatory biomarkers in endometrial LBC failed to predict the efficacy of LEN/PEM, while peripheral blood NLR score sampled prior to LEN/PEM potentially could be a significant predictor.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.16182","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

To identify prognostic biomarkers that could predict how well patients will respond to lenvatinib/pembrolizumab (LEN/PEM). The utility of certain inflammatory biomarkers in endometrial liquid-based cytology (LBC) or peripheral blood samples, such as neutrophil counts, lymphocyte counts, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were explored.

Methods

The study included 25 patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer who had received LEN/PEM between August 2018 and March 2024. Predictors for overall response (OR), disease control, and progression-free survival, based on neutrophil/lymphocyte counts, NLR scores of the endometrial LBC prior to initial treatment, and peripheral blood prior to initial treatment and prior to LEM/PEM treatment were compared using a receiver operating characteristic curve. Significant predictors were evaluated using the log-rank test, and multivariate analysis.

Results

Although neutrophil counts and NLR score in endometrial LBC prior to initial treatment were better effective predictors for OR, the most accurate predictor of a progression-free status was NLR score in peripheral blood prior to LEM/PEM (0.722, 95% CI: 0.45–0.99, sensitivity: 57.1%, specificity: 94.4%). In peripheral blood prior to LEN/PEM, the lower NLR (NLR <5.39) group had a significantly longer PFS than the higher NLR (5.39 ≤ NLR) group (p = 0.023, median survival: 13.5 vs. 3.0 months), and tended to be independently correlated with PFS (hazard ratio = 2.571; 95% CI = 0.857–7.719; p = 0.092).

Conclusion

Inflammatory biomarkers in endometrial LBC failed to predict the efficacy of LEN/PEM, while peripheral blood NLR score sampled prior to LEN/PEM potentially could be a significant predictor.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
lenvatinib + pembrolizumab治疗晚期子宫内膜癌的潜在炎症生物标志物。
目的:确定预后生物标志物,以预测患者对lenvatinib/pembrolizumab (LEN/PEM)的反应。探讨了某些炎症生物标志物在子宫内膜液基细胞学(LBC)或外周血样本中的应用,如中性粒细胞计数、淋巴细胞计数和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)。方法:该研究纳入了2018年8月至2024年3月期间接受LEN/PEM治疗的25例晚期或复发子宫内膜癌患者。根据中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞计数、初始治疗前子宫内膜LBC NLR评分、初始治疗前和LEM/PEM治疗前的外周血,使用接受者工作特征曲线比较总体缓解(OR)、疾病控制和无进展生存期的预测指标。使用log-rank检验和多变量分析评估显著预测因子。结果:虽然初始治疗前子宫内膜LBC的中性粒细胞计数和NLR评分是更有效的OR预测指标,但最准确的无进展状态预测指标是LEM/PEM前外周血NLR评分(0.722,95% CI: 0.45-0.99,敏感性:57.1%,特异性:94.4%)。结论:子宫内膜LBC中的炎症生物标志物无法预测LEN/PEM的疗效,而LEN/PEM之前采集的外周血NLR评分可能是一个重要的预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
376
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research is the official Journal of the Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and aims to provide a medium for the publication of articles in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal publishes original research articles, case reports, review articles and letters to the editor. The Journal will give publication priority to original research articles over case reports. Accepted papers become the exclusive licence of the Journal. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two referees and/or Associate Editors expert in the field of the submitted paper.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of intra-amniotic colonization based on copy numbers of 16S ribosomal deoxyribonucleic acid: A diagnostic and prognostic study Postpartum period according to Roy adaptation model: Assessment of fatigue, self-esteem, functional status, and dyadic adjustment What's the difference between human-written manuscripts versus ChatGPT-generated manuscripts involving “human touch”? Awareness and attitude toward cardio-oncology among Japanese gynecologic oncologists in managing patients with endometrial cancer: The Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG) questionnaire surveys Evaluation of fetal aortic isthmus diameter and flow in pregnant women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy; may it be a marker of poor perinatal outcomes?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1