{"title":"Comparison of the Efficacy of Nal-IRI+5FU/LV and S-1 in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Refractory to Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel.","authors":"Kazuhisa Yamaguchi, Yoshinori Kikuchi, Yusuke Kimura, Susumu Iwasaki, Kensuke Takuma, Naoki Okano, Takahisa Matsuda","doi":"10.1159/000543027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) + 5-fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) is the new standard second-line therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). Tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil potassium (S-1) have been used in advanced PC after gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel treatment, but the clinical difference between nal-IRI+5-FU/LV and S-1 remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of nal-IRI+5-FU/LV and S-1 in patients with advanced PC refractory to GEM plus nab-paclitaxel. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed patients with advanced PC who were refractory to GEM plus nab-paclitaxel from May 2015 to January 2022 at our hospital. Twelve patients treated with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV and 51 patients treated with S-1 were included in this study. Comparing the nal-IRI+5-FU/LV and S-1 groups, the median PFS was 2.95 months versus 2.10 months (p = 0.658), respectively, and the median OS was 8.51 months versus 5.83 months (p = 0.763), respectively. The ORR and DCR were 8.3% and 2.0% (p = 0.347) and 58.3% and 49.0% (p = 0.750) for the nal-IRI+5-FU/LV and S-1 groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in adverse events between the two groups. In a subgroup analysis, patients under 65 years of age treated with S-1 had a significantly better median OS (HR, 3.46; 95% CI: 1.02-11.71, p = 0.046).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nal-IRI+5-FU/LV and S-1 were equally effective and safe as second-line therapy for PC. However, the results suggest that S1 is an option for younger patients, especially those under 65 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) + 5-fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) is the new standard second-line therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). Tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil potassium (S-1) have been used in advanced PC after gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel treatment, but the clinical difference between nal-IRI+5-FU/LV and S-1 remains unclear.
Methods: We retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of nal-IRI+5-FU/LV and S-1 in patients with advanced PC refractory to GEM plus nab-paclitaxel. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.
Results: We analyzed patients with advanced PC who were refractory to GEM plus nab-paclitaxel from May 2015 to January 2022 at our hospital. Twelve patients treated with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV and 51 patients treated with S-1 were included in this study. Comparing the nal-IRI+5-FU/LV and S-1 groups, the median PFS was 2.95 months versus 2.10 months (p = 0.658), respectively, and the median OS was 8.51 months versus 5.83 months (p = 0.763), respectively. The ORR and DCR were 8.3% and 2.0% (p = 0.347) and 58.3% and 49.0% (p = 0.750) for the nal-IRI+5-FU/LV and S-1 groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in adverse events between the two groups. In a subgroup analysis, patients under 65 years of age treated with S-1 had a significantly better median OS (HR, 3.46; 95% CI: 1.02-11.71, p = 0.046).
Conclusion: Nal-IRI+5-FU/LV and S-1 were equally effective and safe as second-line therapy for PC. However, the results suggest that S1 is an option for younger patients, especially those under 65 years.
期刊介绍：
Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
