Constructing and Validating Models for Predicting Gleason Grade Group Upgrading Following Radical Prostatectomy in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comparison between Machine Learning Algorithms and Conventional Logistic Regression.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1159/000543492
Qian Gui, Xin Wang, Dandan Wu, Yonglian Guo
{"title":"Constructing and Validating Models for Predicting Gleason Grade Group Upgrading Following Radical Prostatectomy in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comparison between Machine Learning Algorithms and Conventional Logistic Regression.","authors":"Qian Gui, Xin Wang, Dandan Wu, Yonglian Guo","doi":"10.1159/000543492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The occurrence of Gleason grade group upgrading (GGU) significantly impacts both treatment strategy development. We aim to develop an optimal predictive model to assess the risk of GGU in patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa), by comparing traditional logistic regression (LR) with seven machine learning algorithms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective collection of clinical data was conducted on patients who underwent RP at Wuhan Central Hospital (January 2017 to December 2023, n=177) and Jiangxi Cancer Hospital (July 2019 to February 2024, n=87). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was employed to filter the clinical characteristics of patients. Subsequently, models were conducted using multivariate LR, along with seven diverse machine learning algorithms: eXtreme Gradient Boosting, Decision Tree, Multilayer Perceptron, Naive Bayes, k-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine. By employing the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, brier score, recall, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis, we compared the predictive capabilities and clinical utility of eight models to identify the optimal one.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the evaluation of eight models, the LR model demonstrated superior performance. In the modeling set, it achieved an AUC of 0.826 (95% CI: 0.808 - 0.845), accuracy of 0.765, and a brier score of 0.167. In the validation set, it kept good results with an AUC of 0.819 (95% CI: 0.758 - 0.880), accuracy of 0.725, and a brier score of 0.180. The calibration curve, brier score, and DCA also demonstrated the excellent calibration and net benefit of the LR model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After conducting a comprehensive multi-model comparison, we concluded that the LR model was optimal for predicting GGU, which was confirmed by external validation. Our study also revealed percent free prostate-specific antigen density as a predictive factor for GGU, offering a novel approach for managing localized PCa patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543492","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The occurrence of Gleason grade group upgrading (GGU) significantly impacts both treatment strategy development. We aim to develop an optimal predictive model to assess the risk of GGU in patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa), by comparing traditional logistic regression (LR) with seven machine learning algorithms.

Methods: A retrospective collection of clinical data was conducted on patients who underwent RP at Wuhan Central Hospital (January 2017 to December 2023, n=177) and Jiangxi Cancer Hospital (July 2019 to February 2024, n=87). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was employed to filter the clinical characteristics of patients. Subsequently, models were conducted using multivariate LR, along with seven diverse machine learning algorithms: eXtreme Gradient Boosting, Decision Tree, Multilayer Perceptron, Naive Bayes, k-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine. By employing the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, brier score, recall, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis, we compared the predictive capabilities and clinical utility of eight models to identify the optimal one.

Results: In the evaluation of eight models, the LR model demonstrated superior performance. In the modeling set, it achieved an AUC of 0.826 (95% CI: 0.808 - 0.845), accuracy of 0.765, and a brier score of 0.167. In the validation set, it kept good results with an AUC of 0.819 (95% CI: 0.758 - 0.880), accuracy of 0.725, and a brier score of 0.180. The calibration curve, brier score, and DCA also demonstrated the excellent calibration and net benefit of the LR model.

Conclusions: After conducting a comprehensive multi-model comparison, we concluded that the LR model was optimal for predicting GGU, which was confirmed by external validation. Our study also revealed percent free prostate-specific antigen density as a predictive factor for GGU, offering a novel approach for managing localized PCa patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oncology
Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.
期刊最新文献
High expression of tetraspanin CD63 predicts poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Analysis of Pleiotropic Effects of Nivolumab in Patients with Relapsed Pleural Mesothelioma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Constructing and Validating Models for Predicting Gleason Grade Group Upgrading Following Radical Prostatectomy in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comparison between Machine Learning Algorithms and Conventional Logistic Regression. Post-Marketing Safety of Temozolomide: A Pharmacovigilance Study Based on the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System. Health-Related Quality of Life in a Real-World Cohort of Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1