ProFESS: Changing the Way Multidisciplinary Student's Professional Behaviour Lapses Are Identified and Managed. An Evaluation of Educators' Perspectives

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2024-12-22 DOI:10.1111/tct.13845
Lyn Clearihan, Marilyn Baird, Wayne Hodgson, Janeane Dart, Charlotte Barber, Claire Palermo
{"title":"ProFESS: Changing the Way Multidisciplinary Student's Professional Behaviour Lapses Are Identified and Managed. An Evaluation of Educators' Perspectives","authors":"Lyn Clearihan,&nbsp;Marilyn Baird,&nbsp;Wayne Hodgson,&nbsp;Janeane Dart,&nbsp;Charlotte Barber,&nbsp;Claire Palermo","doi":"10.1111/tct.13845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Best practice evidence for identifying and managing professional behaviour lapses in a multidisciplinary context is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate multidisciplinary educators' attitudes and perceptions of the ProFESS (<span>Prof</span>essional standards, <span>E</span>thical Behaviour and <span>S</span>tudent <span>S</span>upport) framework and its companion Fitness for Practice model, designed and implemented at a large Australian university to address this using a behaviour change approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A 72-item survey based on the Context, Input, Process, Product evaluation framework was completed by 92 multidisciplinary faculty educators and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Content analysis of open text responses occurred.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>ProFESS and Fitness for Practice were found to be acceptable irrespective of the discipline using them, providing a supportive, transparent, consistent approach for identifying and managing a professional behaviour lapse. Other key strengths of the framework included its student-centredness and fostering a sense of safety for respondents with potential to improve student-educator relationships.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings suggest that ProFESS enhances educators' confidence in managing professional behaviour lapses and that its structural flexibility and adaptability underpin its acceptability for multidisciplinary educators. Many of its positive attributes address the failure to fail barriers. The ProFESS method provides opportunities for greater consistency of application as it does not require individual interpretation of behaviour but does require education and training to apply consistently.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The acceptability of the ProFESS/FfP framework in a multidisciplinary healthcare education context is promising for integrating support and standards, fostering a safety culture for educators and reducing ‘failure to fail’ barriers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.13845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Best practice evidence for identifying and managing professional behaviour lapses in a multidisciplinary context is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate multidisciplinary educators' attitudes and perceptions of the ProFESS (Professional standards, Ethical Behaviour and Student Support) framework and its companion Fitness for Practice model, designed and implemented at a large Australian university to address this using a behaviour change approach.

Methods

A 72-item survey based on the Context, Input, Process, Product evaluation framework was completed by 92 multidisciplinary faculty educators and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Content analysis of open text responses occurred.

Findings

ProFESS and Fitness for Practice were found to be acceptable irrespective of the discipline using them, providing a supportive, transparent, consistent approach for identifying and managing a professional behaviour lapse. Other key strengths of the framework included its student-centredness and fostering a sense of safety for respondents with potential to improve student-educator relationships.

Discussion

Our findings suggest that ProFESS enhances educators' confidence in managing professional behaviour lapses and that its structural flexibility and adaptability underpin its acceptability for multidisciplinary educators. Many of its positive attributes address the failure to fail barriers. The ProFESS method provides opportunities for greater consistency of application as it does not require individual interpretation of behaviour but does require education and training to apply consistently.

Conclusions

The acceptability of the ProFESS/FfP framework in a multidisciplinary healthcare education context is promising for integrating support and standards, fostering a safety culture for educators and reducing ‘failure to fail’ barriers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教授:改变多学科学生职业行为失误的识别和管理方式。对教育者观点的评价。
背景:缺乏在多学科背景下识别和管理专业行为失误的最佳实践证据。本研究旨在评估多学科教育工作者对ProFESS(专业标准、道德行为和学生支持)框架及其配套的实践适应性模型的态度和看法,该模型是在澳大利亚一所大型大学设计和实施的,旨在通过行为改变方法解决这一问题。方法:对92名多学科教师进行基于情境、输入、过程、产品评估框架的72项调查,并采用描述性统计和推理统计进行分析。对开放文本回复进行内容分析。发现:教授和实践适应性被发现是可以接受的,无论使用它们的学科,为识别和管理专业行为失误提供了一个支持性的,透明的,一致的方法。该框架的其他主要优势包括以学生为中心,培养受访者的安全感,有可能改善学生与教育者的关系。讨论:我们的研究结果表明,ProFESS提高了教育工作者管理专业行为失误的信心,其结构的灵活性和适应性巩固了多学科教育工作者的可接受性。它的许多积极属性解决了失败的障碍。专业技术教育方法为更一致的应用提供了机会,因为它不需要个人对行为的解释,但需要教育和培训来一致地应用。结论:在多学科卫生保健教育背景下,ProFESS/FfP框架的可接受性有望整合支持和标准,培养教育工作者的安全文化,减少“失败到失败”的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
期刊最新文献
Implementing an Escape Room for Clinical Skills Practice in a Paediatrics Clerkship Issue Information Early Enhancement of Clinical Practice: Integrating Evaluative Judgement Into Undergraduate Medical Education How to Approach Qualitative Observational Research in Workplace Learning The Possibilities of Observational Research in Workplace Learning: The Case of Video-Reflexive Ethnography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1