Diverging paths: Modeling the relation between adverse effects, attitudes, perceived adherence, and treatment effect in an internet-based cognitive-behavioral intervention for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

IF 4.2 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behaviour Research and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-12-15 DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2024.104673

Anna Baumeister, Lea Schuurmans, Josephine Schultz, Johanna Schröder, Steffen Moritz, Lena Jelinek

{"title":"Diverging paths: Modeling the relation between adverse effects, attitudes, perceived adherence, and treatment effect in an internet-based cognitive-behavioral intervention for obsessive-compulsive disorder.","authors":"Anna Baumeister, Lea Schuurmans, Josephine Schultz, Johanna Schröder, Steffen Moritz, Lena Jelinek","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2024.104673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aim: The efficacy of internet-based interventions (IBI) for various psychiatric disorders is widely established, but little is known about the mechanisms or possible influencing factors. One of the most prominent problems in IBI is low adherence, but the relationship between adherence and level of improvement is still unclear. Patients' attitudes and beliefs about IBI as well as the experience of adverse effects-another widely neglected topic-may also influence the effectiveness of these interventions. This secondary analysis is aimed at investigating the relationship between adverse effects, attitudes, perceived adherence (i.e., patient's impression of their compliance), and treatment effect in an IBI for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).Methods: Participants were 151 individuals with symptoms of OCD, of which 59.96% (n = 90) took part in the post-assessment. Attitudes toward IBI were assessed before they used an IBI for OCD; subjective adherence perception and experience of negative effects were assessed afterward. OCD symptom severity was evaluated at two time points, the difference score defining the treatment effect. A path analysis was conducted to test the hypothesized model. Objective and subjective adherence measures were correlated exploratively.Results: The path analysis revealed that attitude toward IBI and adverse effects were negatively associated with adherence perception but adherence perception was not associated with the treatment effect. Objective and subjective adherence measures did not correlate.Conclusion: The results did not support the hypothesized model. Since both attitudes toward IBI and adverse effects were negatively associated with adherence perception, managing users' expectations clearly before using IBI might improve adherence. The role of adherence perception on the treatment effect is yet to be clarified.","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"185 ","pages":"104673"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2024.104673","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: The efficacy of internet-based interventions (IBI) for various psychiatric disorders is widely established, but little is known about the mechanisms or possible influencing factors. One of the most prominent problems in IBI is low adherence, but the relationship between adherence and level of improvement is still unclear. Patients' attitudes and beliefs about IBI as well as the experience of adverse effects-another widely neglected topic-may also influence the effectiveness of these interventions. This secondary analysis is aimed at investigating the relationship between adverse effects, attitudes, perceived adherence (i.e., patient's impression of their compliance), and treatment effect in an IBI for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).

Methods: Participants were 151 individuals with symptoms of OCD, of which 59.96% (n = 90) took part in the post-assessment. Attitudes toward IBI were assessed before they used an IBI for OCD; subjective adherence perception and experience of negative effects were assessed afterward. OCD symptom severity was evaluated at two time points, the difference score defining the treatment effect. A path analysis was conducted to test the hypothesized model. Objective and subjective adherence measures were correlated exploratively.

Results: The path analysis revealed that attitude toward IBI and adverse effects were negatively associated with adherence perception but adherence perception was not associated with the treatment effect. Objective and subjective adherence measures did not correlate.

Conclusion: The results did not support the hypothesized model. Since both attitudes toward IBI and adverse effects were negatively associated with adherence perception, managing users' expectations clearly before using IBI might improve adherence. The role of adherence perception on the treatment effect is yet to be clarified.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Behaviour Research and Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

7.50

自引率

7.30%

发文量

148

期刊介绍： The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.