Gatekeeping Through Remote Family Physician Consultations in Tertiary University Hospital During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Telemedicine and e-Health Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1089/tmj.2024.0509
Rodrigo Pedroso Tolio, Fabiana Carvalho, Dimitris Varvaki Rados, Rita Mattiello, George Henrique Aliatti Mantese, Roberto Nunes Umpierre, Rodolfo Souza da Silva, Sotero Serrate Mengue, Natan Katz, Marcelo Rodrigues Gonçalves
{"title":"Gatekeeping Through Remote Family Physician Consultations in Tertiary University Hospital During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Rodrigo Pedroso Tolio, Fabiana Carvalho, Dimitris Varvaki Rados, Rita Mattiello, George Henrique Aliatti Mantese, Roberto Nunes Umpierre, Rodolfo Souza da Silva, Sotero Serrate Mengue, Natan Katz, Marcelo Rodrigues Gonçalves","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>: To explore the potential of gatekeeping for specialized consultations and patient care via remote interactions with family physicians. <b>Methods:</b> This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary hospital between November 2020 and December 2021, when specialized consultations were canceled due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients who were evaluated for remote consultation with family physicians were included. Remote consultations were done by a family physician team facilitated through the TelessaúdeRS-UFRGS service. The primary outcome was potential patients eligible for discharge from specialty ambulatory to primary care. <b>Data Sources and Analytic Sample</b>: Data were collected from hospital records. Candidates for remote consult included stable health conditions, indicating the absence of acute or decompensated symptoms as reported in the consult request via the online platform, absence of necessity for any medical procedures or scheduled surgeries, and absence of time-sensitive situations. The prevalence of the outcome was estimated at a corresponding 95% confidence interval. The chi-square test compared the outcome according to COVID-19 mortality waves and specialty groups. <b>Results</b>: At the outset, 2,429 consultations were assessed against the study's eligibility criteria. Among these, 2,160 consultations were included, of whom 776 were candidates for family physician team consultation. Subsequently, the remote family physicians team conducted 557 (23% of the original sample) consultations. Overall, 10% (95% CI: 9-11) had the potential to be discharged from specialty care. Patients' age was linked to discharged likelihood. Prevalence rates varied across specialty groups (highest in surgical patients) and COVID-19 waves (highest in the second wave). <b>Conclusions</b>: This study, conducted within a tertiary hospital's specialty outpatient clinic, highlights the potential of remote consultations with a family physician team in identifying cases suitable for management in primary care settings. Our findings demonstrate that 10% of cases assessed through remote consultations exhibited potential for primary care management.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0509","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the potential of gatekeeping for specialized consultations and patient care via remote interactions with family physicians. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary hospital between November 2020 and December 2021, when specialized consultations were canceled due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients who were evaluated for remote consultation with family physicians were included. Remote consultations were done by a family physician team facilitated through the TelessaúdeRS-UFRGS service. The primary outcome was potential patients eligible for discharge from specialty ambulatory to primary care. Data Sources and Analytic Sample: Data were collected from hospital records. Candidates for remote consult included stable health conditions, indicating the absence of acute or decompensated symptoms as reported in the consult request via the online platform, absence of necessity for any medical procedures or scheduled surgeries, and absence of time-sensitive situations. The prevalence of the outcome was estimated at a corresponding 95% confidence interval. The chi-square test compared the outcome according to COVID-19 mortality waves and specialty groups. Results: At the outset, 2,429 consultations were assessed against the study's eligibility criteria. Among these, 2,160 consultations were included, of whom 776 were candidates for family physician team consultation. Subsequently, the remote family physicians team conducted 557 (23% of the original sample) consultations. Overall, 10% (95% CI: 9-11) had the potential to be discharged from specialty care. Patients' age was linked to discharged likelihood. Prevalence rates varied across specialty groups (highest in surgical patients) and COVID-19 waves (highest in the second wave). Conclusions: This study, conducted within a tertiary hospital's specialty outpatient clinic, highlights the potential of remote consultations with a family physician team in identifying cases suitable for management in primary care settings. Our findings demonstrate that 10% of cases assessed through remote consultations exhibited potential for primary care management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎大流行期间,三级大学医院家庭医生远程会诊的把关情况:一项横断面研究
目的:探讨通过与家庭医生的远程互动,为专科会诊和患者护理把关的潜力。方法:本横断面研究于2020年11月至2021年12月在一家三级医院进行,当时因COVID-19大流行而取消了专科会诊。接受家庭医生远程咨询评估的患者也包括在内。通过TelessaúdeRS-UFRGS服务,一个家庭医生小组进行了远程会诊。主要结果是潜在患者有资格从专科门诊转到初级保健。数据来源和分析样本:数据来源于医院记录。远程会诊的候选者包括健康状况稳定,表明没有在线平台咨询请求中报告的急性或失代偿症状,没有必要进行任何医疗程序或预定的手术,以及没有时间敏感的情况。结果的患病率在相应的95%置信区间估计。卡方检验根据COVID-19死亡率波和专科组比较结果。结果:一开始,2429例咨询被评估为符合研究的资格标准。其中包括2160个咨询,其中776个是家庭医生团队咨询的候选人。随后,远程家庭医生团队进行了557次咨询(占原始样本的23%)。总体而言,10% (95% CI: 9-11)有可能从专科护理中出院。患者的年龄与出院的可能性有关。不同专科组的患病率(外科患者最高)和COVID-19波(第二波最高)各不相同。结论:本研究在一家三级医院的专科门诊进行,强调了与家庭医生团队远程会诊在确定适合在初级保健机构进行管理的病例方面的潜力。我们的研究结果表明,通过远程咨询评估的病例中有10%显示出初级保健管理的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
期刊最新文献
When Are Single Reader Evaluations Insufficient in Teledermoscopic Assessments? Analyses of a Retrospective Cohort Study. Same as It Ever Was. A Systematic Review of Telemedicine Solutions to Provide Psychological Interventions for Women Receiving Fertility Treatments. Experience of The National Emergency Tele-Critical Care Network. Post-Telemedicine Acute Care for Undifferentiated High-Acuity Conditions: Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1