Discordant Medication Beliefs in Black Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Diabetes.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jagp.2024.12.001
Barry W Rovner, Robin J Casten
{"title":"Discordant Medication Beliefs in Black Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Diabetes.","authors":"Barry W Rovner, Robin J Casten","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects of discordant medication beliefs on diabetes self-management and glycemic control in older Black individuals with diabetes and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from two clinical trials testing behavioral interventions to improve glycemic control in older Black primary care patients with diabetes and MCI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean number of discordant medication beliefs was 6 (SD = 3; range 0 to 16). Sixty-seven of 246 (27%) participants held ≥ 9 discordant beliefs (i.e., one SD above the mean), and these participants had worse diabetes self-management and glycemic control than participants with fewer beliefs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Discordant medication beliefs, low adherence to diabetes self-management, poor glycemic control, and impaired cognition may exist in a causal relationship. Modifying discordant medication beliefs may eliminate the first step of this pathogenic sequence and reduce risk of cognitive decline in a high-risk population of older Black individuals with diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55534,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2024.12.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects of discordant medication beliefs on diabetes self-management and glycemic control in older Black individuals with diabetes and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI).

Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from two clinical trials testing behavioral interventions to improve glycemic control in older Black primary care patients with diabetes and MCI.

Results: The mean number of discordant medication beliefs was 6 (SD = 3; range 0 to 16). Sixty-seven of 246 (27%) participants held ≥ 9 discordant beliefs (i.e., one SD above the mean), and these participants had worse diabetes self-management and glycemic control than participants with fewer beliefs.

Conclusions: Discordant medication beliefs, low adherence to diabetes self-management, poor glycemic control, and impaired cognition may exist in a causal relationship. Modifying discordant medication beliefs may eliminate the first step of this pathogenic sequence and reduce risk of cognitive decline in a high-risk population of older Black individuals with diabetes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑人轻度认知障碍与糖尿病患者用药信念的不一致。
目的:探讨不一致用药信念对老年黑人糖尿病伴轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者糖尿病自我管理和血糖控制的影响。方法:对两项临床试验的基线数据进行横断面分析,这些试验检验了行为干预对老年黑人糖尿病和轻度认知障碍患者血糖控制的改善作用。结果:不一致用药信念平均为6个(SD = 3;范围0到16)。246名参与者中有67名(27%)持有≥9个不一致信念(即高于平均值1个标准差),这些参与者的糖尿病自我管理和血糖控制比信念较少的参与者更差。结论:不一致的用药信念、糖尿病自我管理依从性低、血糖控制不良和认知障碍可能存在因果关系。修改不一致的用药信念可能会消除这一致病序列的第一步,并降低老年黑人糖尿病患者高危人群认知能力下降的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry is the leading source of information in the rapidly evolving field of geriatric psychiatry. This esteemed journal features peer-reviewed articles covering topics such as the diagnosis and classification of psychiatric disorders in older adults, epidemiological and biological correlates of mental health in the elderly, and psychopharmacology and other somatic treatments. Published twelve times a year, the journal serves as an authoritative resource for professionals in the field.
期刊最新文献
Caregiving Experiences as Mediators Between Caregiving Stressors and Anticipatory Grief in Severe Dementia: Findings From Longitudinal Path Analysis. Life Fatigue: A Critical Analysis. Long-Term Impact of Delirium on the Risk of Dementia in Hospitalized Older Patients: A Real-World Multicenter Study. Surviving Cancer and the Risk of Developing Dementia: Is There a True Risk? Association of Cognitive Frailty With Subsequent All-Cause Mortality Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in 17 Countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1