Pain management and social functioning limitations among adults with chronic pain by diabetes status: National Health Interview Survey, United States, 2019–2020

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Primary Care Diabetes Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pcd.2024.12.008
Ibrahim Zaganjor, Ryan Saelee, Yoshihisa Miyamoto, Fang Xu, Meda E. Pavkov
{"title":"Pain management and social functioning limitations among adults with chronic pain by diabetes status: National Health Interview Survey, United States, 2019–2020","authors":"Ibrahim Zaganjor,&nbsp;Ryan Saelee,&nbsp;Yoshihisa Miyamoto,&nbsp;Fang Xu,&nbsp;Meda E. Pavkov","doi":"10.1016/j.pcd.2024.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>This study aims to describe pain management technique usage and social functioning limitations among adults with chronic pain by diabetes status.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The 2019 and 2020 National Health Interview Survey data were pooled to complete this analysis. Use of the following techniques in the past 3 months were measured: 1) prescription opioids; 2) physical, rehabilitative, or occupational therapy; 3) talk therapies; 4) chiropractic care; 5) yoga, Tai Chi, or Qi Gong; 6) massage; and 7) relaxation techniques. The social functioning limitations assessed were: 1) doing errands alone; 2) participating in social activities; and 3) work limitations. Weighted prevalence and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for each outcome by diabetes status. Logistic regression was used to estimate age- and sex-adjusted odds ratios (aORs) to assess differences by diabetes status.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Adults with diabetes and chronic pain were more likely to use prescription opioids (aOR: 1.4; 95 % CI: 1.2, 1.6) but less likely to use various nonpharmacological techniques than those without diabetes. Additionally, adults with diabetes and chronic pain were more likely to report each social functioning limitation than those without diabetes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Results suggest adults with diabetes and chronic pain may be missing beneficial opportunities to manage pain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48997,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Diabetes","volume":"19 1","pages":"Pages 40-45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Care Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751991824002444","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

This study aims to describe pain management technique usage and social functioning limitations among adults with chronic pain by diabetes status.

Methods

The 2019 and 2020 National Health Interview Survey data were pooled to complete this analysis. Use of the following techniques in the past 3 months were measured: 1) prescription opioids; 2) physical, rehabilitative, or occupational therapy; 3) talk therapies; 4) chiropractic care; 5) yoga, Tai Chi, or Qi Gong; 6) massage; and 7) relaxation techniques. The social functioning limitations assessed were: 1) doing errands alone; 2) participating in social activities; and 3) work limitations. Weighted prevalence and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for each outcome by diabetes status. Logistic regression was used to estimate age- and sex-adjusted odds ratios (aORs) to assess differences by diabetes status.

Results

Adults with diabetes and chronic pain were more likely to use prescription opioids (aOR: 1.4; 95 % CI: 1.2, 1.6) but less likely to use various nonpharmacological techniques than those without diabetes. Additionally, adults with diabetes and chronic pain were more likely to report each social functioning limitation than those without diabetes.

Conclusions

Results suggest adults with diabetes and chronic pain may be missing beneficial opportunities to manage pain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病成人慢性疼痛患者的疼痛管理和社会功能限制:美国国家健康访谈调查,2019-2020
目的:本研究旨在描述糖尿病慢性疼痛成人患者的疼痛管理技术使用和社会功能限制。方法:收集2019年和2020年全国健康访谈调查数据,完成分析。对近3个月内使用以下技术进行了测量:1)处方阿片类药物;2)物理、康复或职业治疗;3)谈话疗法;4)捏脊护理;5)瑜伽、太极或气功;6)按摩;还有放松技巧。评估的社会功能限制包括:1)独自办事;2)参加社会活动;3)工作限制。加权患病率和95 %置信区间(ci)根据糖尿病状况对每个结果进行估计。使用逻辑回归估计年龄和性别调整的优势比(aORs)来评估糖尿病状态的差异。结果:患有糖尿病和慢性疼痛的成年人更倾向于使用处方阿片类药物(aOR: 1.4;95 % CI: 1.2, 1.6),但使用各种非药物技术的可能性低于非糖尿病患者。此外,患有糖尿病和慢性疼痛的成年人比没有糖尿病的人更有可能报告每种社会功能限制。结论:结果表明糖尿病和慢性疼痛的成年人可能错过了控制疼痛的有益机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Primary Care Diabetes
Primary Care Diabetes ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
134
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original research articles and high quality reviews in the fields of clinical care, diabetes education, nutrition, health services, psychosocial research and epidemiology and other areas as far as is relevant for diabetology in a primary-care setting. The purpose of the journal is to encourage interdisciplinary research and discussion between all those who are involved in primary diabetes care on an international level. The Journal also publishes news and articles concerning the policies and activities of Primary Care Diabetes Europe and reflects the society''s aim of improving the care for people with diabetes mellitus within the primary-care setting.
期刊最新文献
Contents Trends in type 2 diabetes medication use and guideline adherence in Belgian primary care (2019–2023) Diabetic myonecrosis: A rare complication of long-standing diabetes mellitus Association between periodontal disease and gestational diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis Risk factors for mortality among people with diabetes in Spain: The DIMORTES study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1