Age Differences in Pedestrian Navigational Skills and Performance: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.

Tong Bill Xu, Viraj Nitin Govani, Saleh Kalantari
{"title":"Age Differences in Pedestrian Navigational Skills and Performance: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Tong Bill Xu, Viraj Nitin Govani, Saleh Kalantari","doi":"10.1016/j.arr.2024.102591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study summarized current findings on age differences (young vs. older adults) in pedestrian navigational performance, spatial learning, and examined moderating effects of experimental environment (e.g., real-world vs. virtual environments).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two reviewers independently screened studies from PubMed, Web of Science, PsychInfo, and AgeLine until December 2022.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>(1) empirical navigational study; (2) healthy older adults (mean age above 60); (3) age as a categorical variable; (4) peer-reviewed paper in English.</p><p><strong>Exclusion criteria: </strong>(1) overly simplified environments; (2) tasks performed with transportation; (3) small sample size (n<10).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>5981 studies were screened, 18 were eligible with 406 total participants. Three-level meta-analysis estimated standardized mean age difference of 1.15 (95% CI: [0.64, 1.65]) in navigational performance, and 0.97 (95% CI: [0.81, 1.13]) in spatial learning. Study environments were found to marginally moderate age differences in navigational performance, but not in spatial learning.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Older adults have poorer navigational performance and spatial learning outcomes compared to their younger counterparts, with marginally greater performance differences in virtual environments than in the real world. Findings were limited by low number eligible studies, especially real-world experiments. Future studies should continue to test generalizability of high-fidelity VR and identify spatial design elements that can mitigate age differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":93862,"journal":{"name":"Ageing research reviews","volume":" ","pages":"102591"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ageing research reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2024.102591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study summarized current findings on age differences (young vs. older adults) in pedestrian navigational performance, spatial learning, and examined moderating effects of experimental environment (e.g., real-world vs. virtual environments).

Methods: Two reviewers independently screened studies from PubMed, Web of Science, PsychInfo, and AgeLine until December 2022.

Inclusion criteria: (1) empirical navigational study; (2) healthy older adults (mean age above 60); (3) age as a categorical variable; (4) peer-reviewed paper in English.

Exclusion criteria: (1) overly simplified environments; (2) tasks performed with transportation; (3) small sample size (n<10).

Results: 5981 studies were screened, 18 were eligible with 406 total participants. Three-level meta-analysis estimated standardized mean age difference of 1.15 (95% CI: [0.64, 1.65]) in navigational performance, and 0.97 (95% CI: [0.81, 1.13]) in spatial learning. Study environments were found to marginally moderate age differences in navigational performance, but not in spatial learning.

Discussion: Older adults have poorer navigational performance and spatial learning outcomes compared to their younger counterparts, with marginally greater performance differences in virtual environments than in the real world. Findings were limited by low number eligible studies, especially real-world experiments. Future studies should continue to test generalizability of high-fidelity VR and identify spatial design elements that can mitigate age differences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Targeted microbiota dysbiosis repair: An important approach to health management after spinal cord injury. The role and mechanism of triptolide, a potential new DMARD, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Age Differences in Pedestrian Navigational Skills and Performance: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis. The interplay of NAD and hypoxic stress and its relevance for ageing. Association of chronic exercise with markers of cardiometabolic health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1