Tong Bill Xu , Viraj Nitin Govani , Saleh Kalantari
{"title":"Age differences in pedestrian navigational skills and performance: A systemic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Tong Bill Xu , Viraj Nitin Govani , Saleh Kalantari","doi":"10.1016/j.arr.2024.102591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study summarized current findings on age differences (young vs. older adults) in pedestrian navigational performance, spatial learning, and examined moderating effects of experimental environment (e.g., real-world vs. virtual environments).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two reviewers independently screened studies from PubMed, Web of Science, PsychInfo, and AgeLine until December 2022. Inclusion criteria: (1) empirical navigational study; (2) healthy older adults (mean age above 60); (3) age as a categorical variable; (4) peer-reviewed paper in English. Exclusion criteria: (1) overly simplified environments; (2) tasks performed with transportation; (3) small sample size (n < 10).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>5981 studies were screened, 18 were eligible with 406 total participants. Three-level meta-analysis estimated standardized mean age difference of 1.15 (95 % CI: [0.64, 1.65]) in navigational performance, and 0.97 (95 % CI: [0.81, 1.13]) in spatial learning. Study environments were found to marginally moderate age differences in navigational performance, but not in spatial learning.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Older adults have poorer navigational performance and spatial learning outcomes compared to their younger counterparts, with marginally greater performance differences in virtual environments than in the real world. Findings were limited by low number eligible studies, especially real-world experiments. Future studies should continue to test generalizability of high-fidelity VR and identify spatial design elements that can mitigate age differences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55545,"journal":{"name":"Ageing Research Reviews","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 102591"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ageing Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568163724004094","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
This study summarized current findings on age differences (young vs. older adults) in pedestrian navigational performance, spatial learning, and examined moderating effects of experimental environment (e.g., real-world vs. virtual environments).
Methods
Two reviewers independently screened studies from PubMed, Web of Science, PsychInfo, and AgeLine until December 2022. Inclusion criteria: (1) empirical navigational study; (2) healthy older adults (mean age above 60); (3) age as a categorical variable; (4) peer-reviewed paper in English. Exclusion criteria: (1) overly simplified environments; (2) tasks performed with transportation; (3) small sample size (n < 10).
Results
5981 studies were screened, 18 were eligible with 406 total participants. Three-level meta-analysis estimated standardized mean age difference of 1.15 (95 % CI: [0.64, 1.65]) in navigational performance, and 0.97 (95 % CI: [0.81, 1.13]) in spatial learning. Study environments were found to marginally moderate age differences in navigational performance, but not in spatial learning.
Discussion
Older adults have poorer navigational performance and spatial learning outcomes compared to their younger counterparts, with marginally greater performance differences in virtual environments than in the real world. Findings were limited by low number eligible studies, especially real-world experiments. Future studies should continue to test generalizability of high-fidelity VR and identify spatial design elements that can mitigate age differences.
期刊介绍:
With the rise in average human life expectancy, the impact of ageing and age-related diseases on our society has become increasingly significant. Ageing research is now a focal point for numerous laboratories, encompassing leaders in genetics, molecular and cellular biology, biochemistry, and behavior. Ageing Research Reviews (ARR) serves as a cornerstone in this field, addressing emerging trends.
ARR aims to fill a substantial gap by providing critical reviews and viewpoints on evolving discoveries concerning the mechanisms of ageing and age-related diseases. The rapid progress in understanding the mechanisms controlling cellular proliferation, differentiation, and survival is unveiling new insights into the regulation of ageing. From telomerase to stem cells, and from energy to oxyradical metabolism, we are witnessing an exciting era in the multidisciplinary field of ageing research.
The journal explores the cellular and molecular foundations of interventions that extend lifespan, such as caloric restriction. It identifies the underpinnings of manipulations that extend lifespan, shedding light on novel approaches for preventing age-related diseases. ARR publishes articles on focused topics selected from the expansive field of ageing research, with a particular emphasis on the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the aging process. This includes age-related diseases like cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and neurodegenerative disorders. The journal also covers applications of basic ageing research to lifespan extension and disease prevention, offering a comprehensive platform for advancing our understanding of this critical field.