In-depth characterization of T cell responses with a combined Activation-Induced Marker (AIM) and Intracellular Cytokine Staining (ICS) assay.

Oxford open immunology Pub Date : 2024-12-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/oxfimm/iqae014
Yeji Lee, Alison Tarke, Alba Grifoni
{"title":"In-depth characterization of T cell responses with a combined Activation-Induced Marker (AIM) and Intracellular Cytokine Staining (ICS) assay.","authors":"Yeji Lee, Alison Tarke, Alba Grifoni","doi":"10.1093/oxfimm/iqae014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since T cells are key mediators in the adaptive immune system, evaluating antigen-specific T cell immune responses is pivotal to understanding immune function. Commonly used methods for measuring T cell responses include Activation-Induced Marker (AIM) assays and Intracellular Cytokine Staining (ICS). However, combining these approaches has rarely been reported. This study describes a combined AIM + ICS assay and the effect of collecting the supernatant. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from seven healthy donors were stimulated with DMSO (negative control), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) peptide pools, and PHA (positive control). The AIM markers OX40 + CD137+ were used for CD4+ T cells and CD69 + CD137+ and CD107a + CD137+ for CD8+ T cells. Cytokine-secreting cells were identified as CD40L+ cytokine+ for CD4+ and CD69+ or CD107 + cytokine+ for CD8+ T cells. Half of the supernatant was collected before adding the BFA/Monensin/CD137 antibody solution to assess the impact on T cell responses. The CD107a + CD137+ AIM markers combination had a lower background than CD69 + CD137+, making CD107a+ a more sensitive marker for CD8+ AIM markers. Collecting half of the supernatant did not significantly affect the immune responses. Our AIM + ICS combined protocol enables the simultaneous assessment of activation and cytokine release reducing the sample volume for testing T cell responses. We also show that collecting half of the supernatant does not significantly interfere with immune responses detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":74384,"journal":{"name":"Oxford open immunology","volume":"5 1","pages":"iqae014"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661976/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford open immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfimm/iqae014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since T cells are key mediators in the adaptive immune system, evaluating antigen-specific T cell immune responses is pivotal to understanding immune function. Commonly used methods for measuring T cell responses include Activation-Induced Marker (AIM) assays and Intracellular Cytokine Staining (ICS). However, combining these approaches has rarely been reported. This study describes a combined AIM + ICS assay and the effect of collecting the supernatant. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from seven healthy donors were stimulated with DMSO (negative control), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) peptide pools, and PHA (positive control). The AIM markers OX40 + CD137+ were used for CD4+ T cells and CD69 + CD137+ and CD107a + CD137+ for CD8+ T cells. Cytokine-secreting cells were identified as CD40L+ cytokine+ for CD4+ and CD69+ or CD107 + cytokine+ for CD8+ T cells. Half of the supernatant was collected before adding the BFA/Monensin/CD137 antibody solution to assess the impact on T cell responses. The CD107a + CD137+ AIM markers combination had a lower background than CD69 + CD137+, making CD107a+ a more sensitive marker for CD8+ AIM markers. Collecting half of the supernatant did not significantly affect the immune responses. Our AIM + ICS combined protocol enables the simultaneous assessment of activation and cytokine release reducing the sample volume for testing T cell responses. We also show that collecting half of the supernatant does not significantly interfere with immune responses detection.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合激活诱导标记(AIM)和细胞内细胞因子染色(ICS)试验深入表征T细胞反应。
由于T细胞是适应性免疫系统的关键介质,因此评估抗原特异性T细胞免疫反应对于理解免疫功能至关重要。常用的测量T细胞反应的方法包括激活诱导标记(AIM)测定和细胞内细胞因子染色(ICS)。然而,结合这些方法的报道很少。本研究描述了AIM + ICS联合检测和收集上清的效果。用DMSO(阴性对照)、eb病毒(EBV)肽库和PHA(阳性对照)刺激7名健康供者的外周血单个核细胞(PBMCs)。CD4+ T细胞使用AIM标记OX40 + CD137+, CD8+ T细胞使用AIM标记CD69 + CD137+和CD107a + CD137+。细胞因子分泌细胞对CD4+鉴定为CD40L+细胞因子+,对CD8+ T细胞鉴定为CD69+或CD107 +细胞因子+。在加入BFA/ monenin /CD137抗体溶液之前收集一半的上清,以评估对T细胞反应的影响。CD107a+ CD137+ AIM标记物组合的背景比CD69 + CD137+低,使得CD107a+成为CD8+ AIM标记物更敏感的标记物。收集一半的上清液对免疫反应没有显著影响。我们的AIM + ICS联合方案可以同时评估激活和细胞因子释放,减少测试T细胞反应的样本量。我们还表明,收集一半的上清液不会显著干扰免疫反应检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Scientific communication and vaccine hesitation: an analysis of the editorial line of a great Brazilian newspaper. Correction to: In-vitro assessment of cutaneous immune responses to aedes mosquito salivary gland extract and dengue virus in Cambodian individuals. ImmUQBench: a benchmark on uncertainty quantification of protein immunogenicity prediction. Scientific communication and vaccine hesitation: an analysis of the editorial line of a great Brazilian newspaper. Exploring the role of gelsolin and high-density lipoproteins in autoimmune diseases: spotlight on rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1