Correlation between [18F]-FDG PET/CT findings and pathological subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma presenting as ground-glass opacity.

H Ji, S Jiang, C Sun, T Liu, G Yang, L Zhang, J Sun, J Wu
{"title":"Correlation between [18F]-FDG PET/CT findings and pathological subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma presenting as ground-glass opacity.","authors":"H Ji, S Jiang, C Sun, T Liu, G Yang, L Zhang, J Sun, J Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.remnie.2024.500087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to analyze the correlation between [18F]-FDG PET/CT (positron emission tomography/computed tomography) findings and pathological subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma with ground-glass opacity (GGO).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>88 patients were included in this study, which underwent [18F]-FDG PET/CT and were finally diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma. A total of 90 GGO lesions were analyzed. The size and SUV<sub>max</sub> of all lesions were measured, the proportion of solid components of GGO in lesions was calculated, and quantitative classification was performed. The above GGO lesions were divided into three groups based on the 2011 IASLC/ATS/ERS lung adenocarcinoma pathological classification, namely good prognosis group, relatively good prognosis group and poor prognosis group. Chi-square test, independent sample t test, and analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a negative correlation between the SUV<sub>max</sub> and quantitative classification value (r = -0.638, P < 0.001). Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), acinar predominant adenocarcinoma (APA), lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma (LPA), papillary predominant adenocarcinoma (PPA), and solid predominant adenocarcinoma (SPA) had significant differences in GGO lesion size, SUV<sub>max</sub>, and quantitative classification value (F = 3.849, P = 0.019; F = 27.420, P < 0.001; F = 4.353, P = 0.002). There were significant differences in GGO lesion size, SUV<sub>max</sub>, and quantitative classification value among the good prognosis group, relatively good prognosis group, and poor prognosis group (F = 5.626, P = 0.011; F = 37.587, P < 0.001; F = 5.119, P = 0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GGO lesion size, SUV<sub>max</sub>, and quantitative classification value are correlated with different pathological subtypes and can be used toevaluate the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma with GGO.</p>","PeriodicalId":94197,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular","volume":" ","pages":"500087"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.remnie.2024.500087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to analyze the correlation between [18F]-FDG PET/CT (positron emission tomography/computed tomography) findings and pathological subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma with ground-glass opacity (GGO).

Materials and methods: 88 patients were included in this study, which underwent [18F]-FDG PET/CT and were finally diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma. A total of 90 GGO lesions were analyzed. The size and SUVmax of all lesions were measured, the proportion of solid components of GGO in lesions was calculated, and quantitative classification was performed. The above GGO lesions were divided into three groups based on the 2011 IASLC/ATS/ERS lung adenocarcinoma pathological classification, namely good prognosis group, relatively good prognosis group and poor prognosis group. Chi-square test, independent sample t test, and analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis.

Results: There was a negative correlation between the SUVmax and quantitative classification value (r = -0.638, P < 0.001). Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), acinar predominant adenocarcinoma (APA), lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma (LPA), papillary predominant adenocarcinoma (PPA), and solid predominant adenocarcinoma (SPA) had significant differences in GGO lesion size, SUVmax, and quantitative classification value (F = 3.849, P = 0.019; F = 27.420, P < 0.001; F = 4.353, P = 0.002). There were significant differences in GGO lesion size, SUVmax, and quantitative classification value among the good prognosis group, relatively good prognosis group, and poor prognosis group (F = 5.626, P = 0.011; F = 37.587, P < 0.001; F = 5.119, P = 0.008).

Conclusion: GGO lesion size, SUVmax, and quantitative classification value are correlated with different pathological subtypes and can be used toevaluate the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma with GGO.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
18F-FDG and 11C-PIB PET/TC findings in status epilepticus in the setting of a patient with mild cognitive impairment. Analysis of dosimetry and clinical variables in treatments of neuroendocrine tumours with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE. Comparison of the diagnostic performances of ct attenuation corrected and non-attenuation corrected spect myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in coronary artery disease. Correlation between [18F]-FDG PET/CT findings and pathological subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma presenting as ground-glass opacity. False Lymph Node Recurrence Image in PET/CT with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. Importance of the Acquisition Protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1