Effects of Vegetation Restoration Type on Soil Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Associated Microbial Regulation on the Loess Plateau

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecology and Evolution Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1002/ece3.70688
Jihai Zhou, Daokun Liu, Shangqi Xu, Xiaoping Li, Jiyong Zheng, Fengpeng Han, Shoubiao Zhou, Meng Na
{"title":"Effects of Vegetation Restoration Type on Soil Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Associated Microbial Regulation on the Loess Plateau","authors":"Jihai Zhou,&nbsp;Daokun Liu,&nbsp;Shangqi Xu,&nbsp;Xiaoping Li,&nbsp;Jiyong Zheng,&nbsp;Fengpeng Han,&nbsp;Shoubiao Zhou,&nbsp;Meng Na","doi":"10.1002/ece3.70688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Investigating responses of soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to vegetation restoration is important for global warming mitigation. On the Loess Plateau, a wide range of vegetation restoration strategies have been implemented to control land degradation. However, the thorough quantification of soil GHG emissions triggered by different modes of vegetation restoration is insufficient. There is still a knowledge gap regarding the regulation of soil biochemical and microbial processing on soil GHG emissions. To do so, we compared responses of soil GHG emissions to various types of vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau, and investigated the changes in soil properties as well as microbial composition and activities. We found that artificial plantation of <i>Caragana korshinskii</i> had low soil carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emission, while natural grassland had high CO<sub>2</sub> emission. The possible explanations could be related to higher moisture and microbial biomass carbon, and greater nitrogen limitation in natural grassland, which was controlled by actinomycetes and gram-negative bacteria. Natural grassland had low soil nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emission and high methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) uptake, whereas <i>Prunus mume</i> had high N<sub>2</sub>O emission and <i>Medicago sativa</i> had low CH<sub>4</sub> uptake, respectively. Soil N<sub>2</sub>O emission could be driven by fungi and gram-positive bacteria which were affected by N availability and dissolved organic carbon. Soil CH<sub>4</sub> consumption was associated with anaerobic bacteria and gram-negative bacteria which were affected by N availability and moisture. These different emissions of CO<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub> generated the largest total GHG emissions for plantation of <i>Prunus mume</i>, but the smallest total GHG emissions for natural grassland and plantation of leguminous <i>Caragana korshinskii</i>. Overall, our findings suggested that the restoration of natural grassland and artificial N-fixing shrubland like <i>Caragana korshinskii</i> should be encouraged to alleviate GHG emissions, with the practical implications for selecting suitable modes and species to improve ecological sustainability in degraded lands.</p>","PeriodicalId":11467,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Evolution","volume":"14 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664210/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.70688","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Investigating responses of soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to vegetation restoration is important for global warming mitigation. On the Loess Plateau, a wide range of vegetation restoration strategies have been implemented to control land degradation. However, the thorough quantification of soil GHG emissions triggered by different modes of vegetation restoration is insufficient. There is still a knowledge gap regarding the regulation of soil biochemical and microbial processing on soil GHG emissions. To do so, we compared responses of soil GHG emissions to various types of vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau, and investigated the changes in soil properties as well as microbial composition and activities. We found that artificial plantation of Caragana korshinskii had low soil carbon dioxide (CO2) emission, while natural grassland had high CO2 emission. The possible explanations could be related to higher moisture and microbial biomass carbon, and greater nitrogen limitation in natural grassland, which was controlled by actinomycetes and gram-negative bacteria. Natural grassland had low soil nitrous oxide (N2O) emission and high methane (CH4) uptake, whereas Prunus mume had high N2O emission and Medicago sativa had low CH4 uptake, respectively. Soil N2O emission could be driven by fungi and gram-positive bacteria which were affected by N availability and dissolved organic carbon. Soil CH4 consumption was associated with anaerobic bacteria and gram-negative bacteria which were affected by N availability and moisture. These different emissions of CO2, N2O and CH4 generated the largest total GHG emissions for plantation of Prunus mume, but the smallest total GHG emissions for natural grassland and plantation of leguminous Caragana korshinskii. Overall, our findings suggested that the restoration of natural grassland and artificial N-fixing shrubland like Caragana korshinskii should be encouraged to alleviate GHG emissions, with the practical implications for selecting suitable modes and species to improve ecological sustainability in degraded lands.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黄土高原植被恢复类型对土壤温室气体排放及微生物调控的影响
研究土壤温室气体(GHG)排放对植被恢复的响应对减缓全球变暖具有重要意义。黄土高原为控制土地退化,实施了多种植被恢复策略。然而,对不同植被恢复模式引发的土壤温室气体排放的定量研究还不够深入。土壤生物化学和微生物处理对土壤温室气体排放的调控仍存在知识空白。为此,我们比较了黄土高原不同类型植被恢复对土壤温室气体排放的响应,并研究了土壤性质、微生物组成和活动的变化。结果表明,人工柠条人工林土壤CO2排放量较低,而天然草地土壤CO2排放量较高。这可能与天然草地较高的水分和微生物生物量碳以及较高的氮限制有关,而这些限制受放线菌和革兰氏阴性菌的控制。天然草地土壤氮氧化物(N2O)排放量低,甲烷(CH4)吸收量高,而梅李(Prunus mume) N2O排放量高,紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa) CH4吸收量低。土壤N2O排放主要受真菌和革兰氏阳性菌驱动,而真菌和革兰氏阳性菌受氮有效性和溶解有机碳的影响。土壤CH4消耗与厌氧菌和革兰氏阴性菌有关,受氮有效性和水分的影响。这些不同的CO2、N2O和CH4排放产生的温室气体总排放量以梅李人工林最大,而天然草地和豆科柠条人工林的温室气体总排放量最小。综上所述,应鼓励天然草地和柠条等人工固氮灌丛的恢复,以减少温室气体的排放,并对选择合适的模式和物种以提高退化土地的生态可持续性具有现实意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1027
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecology and Evolution is the peer reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of ecology, evolution and conservation science. The journal gives priority to quality research reports, theoretical or empirical, that develop our understanding of organisms and their diversity, interactions between them, and the natural environment. Ecology and Evolution gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting theoretical, experimental, applied and descriptive work in terrestrial and aquatic environments. The journal will consider submissions across taxa in areas including but not limited to micro and macro ecological and evolutionary processes, characteristics of and interactions between individuals, populations, communities and the environment, physiological responses to environmental change, population genetics and phylogenetics, relatedness and kin selection, life histories, systematics and taxonomy, conservation genetics, extinction, speciation, adaption, behaviour, biodiversity, species abundance, macroecology, population and ecosystem dynamics, and conservation policy.
期刊最新文献
Multiscale Threats Shape the Occurrence Dynamics of a Threatened Aquatic Salamander and Reveal a Possible Extinction Debt. Lack of Population Structure of an Extreme Migratory Shorebird: Evidence of Gene Flow Between Geographically Disparate Populations. Decluttering Seed Dispersal Modes: Bringing Clarity to Seed Dispersal Ecology. Movement Models to Predict Low-Altitude Flight of Soaring Birds Using Look-Ahead Environmental Factors. Signatures of the Anthropocene: Population Genomic Structure Detected in Pennsylvania Coyotes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1