Optimizing Mainstreaming of Genetic Testing in Parallel With Ovarian and Endometrial Cancer Tumor Testing: How Do We Maximize Our Impact?

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1200/PO-24-00525
Ying L Liu, Tiffany Y Sia, Nancy Varice, Michelle Wu, Maureen Byrne, Aliya Khurram, Yelena Kemel, Margaret Sheehan, Jesse Galle, Paul Sabbatini, Carol Brown, Kara Long Roche, Dennis Chi, David B Solit, Jennifer Mueller, Zsofia K Stadler, Jada G Hamilton, Carol Aghajanian, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
{"title":"Optimizing Mainstreaming of Genetic Testing in Parallel With Ovarian and Endometrial Cancer Tumor Testing: How Do We Maximize Our Impact?","authors":"Ying L Liu, Tiffany Y Sia, Nancy Varice, Michelle Wu, Maureen Byrne, Aliya Khurram, Yelena Kemel, Margaret Sheehan, Jesse Galle, Paul Sabbatini, Carol Brown, Kara Long Roche, Dennis Chi, David B Solit, Jennifer Mueller, Zsofia K Stadler, Jada G Hamilton, Carol Aghajanian, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum","doi":"10.1200/PO-24-00525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although germline genetic testing (GT) is recommended for all patients with ovarian cancer (OC) and some patients with endometrial cancer (EC), uptake remains low with multiple barriers. Our center performs GT in parallel with somatic testing via a targeted sequencing assay (MSK-IMPACT) and initiates testing in oncology clinics (mainstreaming). We sought to optimize our GT processes for OC/EC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a quality improvement study to evaluate our GT processes within gynecologic surgery/medical oncology clinics. All eligible patients with newly diagnosed OC/EC were identified for GT and tracked in a REDCap database. Clinical data and GT rates were collected by the study team, who reviewed data for qualitative themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From February 2023 to April 2023, we identified 116 patients with newly diagnosed OC (n = 57) and EC (n = 59). Patients were mostly White (62%); English was the preferred language for 90%. GT was performed in 52 (91%) patients with OC (seven external, 45 MSK-IMPACT) and in 44 (75%) patients with EC (three external, 41 MSK-IMPACT). GT results were available within 3 months for 100% and 95% of patients with OC and EC, respectively. Reasons for not undergoing GT included being missed by the clinical team where there was no record that GT was recommended, feeling overwhelmed, financial and privacy concerns, and language barriers. In qualitative review, we found that resources were concentrated in the initial visit with little follow-up to encourage GT at subsequent points of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A mainstreaming approach that couples somatic and germline GT resulted in high testing rates in OC/EC; however, barriers were identified. Processes that encourage GT at multiple care points and allow self-directed, multilingual digital consenting should be piloted.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2400525"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670878/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-24-00525","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Although germline genetic testing (GT) is recommended for all patients with ovarian cancer (OC) and some patients with endometrial cancer (EC), uptake remains low with multiple barriers. Our center performs GT in parallel with somatic testing via a targeted sequencing assay (MSK-IMPACT) and initiates testing in oncology clinics (mainstreaming). We sought to optimize our GT processes for OC/EC.

Methods: We performed a quality improvement study to evaluate our GT processes within gynecologic surgery/medical oncology clinics. All eligible patients with newly diagnosed OC/EC were identified for GT and tracked in a REDCap database. Clinical data and GT rates were collected by the study team, who reviewed data for qualitative themes.

Results: From February 2023 to April 2023, we identified 116 patients with newly diagnosed OC (n = 57) and EC (n = 59). Patients were mostly White (62%); English was the preferred language for 90%. GT was performed in 52 (91%) patients with OC (seven external, 45 MSK-IMPACT) and in 44 (75%) patients with EC (three external, 41 MSK-IMPACT). GT results were available within 3 months for 100% and 95% of patients with OC and EC, respectively. Reasons for not undergoing GT included being missed by the clinical team where there was no record that GT was recommended, feeling overwhelmed, financial and privacy concerns, and language barriers. In qualitative review, we found that resources were concentrated in the initial visit with little follow-up to encourage GT at subsequent points of care.

Conclusion: A mainstreaming approach that couples somatic and germline GT resulted in high testing rates in OC/EC; however, barriers were identified. Processes that encourage GT at multiple care points and allow self-directed, multilingual digital consenting should be piloted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化与卵巢癌和子宫内膜癌肿瘤检测并行的基因检测主流化:我们如何最大化我们的影响?
目的:尽管生殖系基因检测(GT)被推荐用于所有卵巢癌(OC)患者和部分子宫内膜癌(EC)患者,但由于存在多重障碍,接受率仍然很低。我们的中心通过靶向测序分析(MSK-IMPACT)在体细胞检测的同时进行GT,并开始在肿瘤诊所进行检测(主流化)。我们试图为OC/EC优化我们的GT流程。方法:我们进行了一项质量改进研究,以评估妇科外科/内科肿瘤诊所的GT流程。所有符合条件的新诊断的OC/EC患者被确定为GT,并在REDCap数据库中进行跟踪。临床数据和GT率由研究小组收集,他们审查了定性主题的数据。结果:从2023年2月到2023年4月,我们确定了116例新诊断的OC (n = 57)和EC (n = 59)。患者以白人居多(62%);90%的人首选英语。52例(91%)OC患者(7例外置,45例MSK-IMPACT)和44例(75%)EC患者(3例外置,41例MSK-IMPACT)行GT。100%的OC和95%的EC患者在3个月内可获得GT结果。不接受GT的原因包括被临床团队遗漏(没有推荐GT的记录)、感觉不堪重负、经济和隐私问题以及语言障碍。在定性回顾中,我们发现资源集中在初次就诊,很少随访以鼓励后续护理点的GT。结论:体细胞和种系GT相结合的主流方法导致了OC/EC的高检出率;然而,已经确定了障碍。应试行在多个护理点鼓励GT并允许自主、多语言数字同意的流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
期刊最新文献
Incorporating Circulating Tumor DNA Testing Into Clinical Trials: A Position Paper by the National Cancer Institute GI Oncology Circulating Tumor DNA Working Group. Association Between Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low Status and Time to Development of Brain Metastases Among Patients With Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Generalized Evolutionary Classifier for Evolutionary Guided Precision Medicine. Multiomics Identifies Potential Molecular Profiles Associated With Outcomes After BRAF-Targeted Therapy in Patients With BRAF V600E-Mutated Advanced Solid Tumors. Time to Benefit of Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1