The timing of surgical interventions following the implantation of coronary drug-eluting stents in patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY International journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000002199
Ziyao Xu, Yingying Lai, Yan Zhou, Lipeng Qin, Xinyu Hao, Tian Li, Lei Gao, Xinxin Wang
{"title":"The timing of surgical interventions following the implantation of coronary drug-eluting stents in patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Ziyao Xu, Yingying Lai, Yan Zhou, Lipeng Qin, Xinyu Hao, Tian Li, Lei Gao, Xinxin Wang","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aim to investigate the optimal timing for surgical interventions to maximize patient benefit.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The guidelines recommending a minimum deferral of 6 months for non-cardiac surgeries following drug-eluting stent percutaneous coronary intervention (DES-PCI) do not adequately address the requirements for individuals undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery (GCS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study encompassed 2501 patients treated from January 2017 to December 2021, all of whom underwent GCS within 1 year after DES-PCI. We conducted an analysis by comparing the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) within 30 days post-surgery at different time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study enrolled a total of 2501 participants with meticulously recorded data who underwent DES-PCI and subsequently underwent GCS within 1 year post-implantation. The incidence rate of MACEs is 14.2%, including MI (5.1%), HF (5.8%), IS (3.2%), and cardiac death (0.2%), across all patients in this study. The threshold probability was determined using the Youden Index, resulting in a value of 0.320, corresponding to a \"time-to-surgery value\" of 87. Significant statistical differences were observed in the occurrence rates of MACEs for adjacent time intervals at 30 days ( P < 0.001), 90 days ( P < 0.009), and 180 days ( P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The timing of surgical intervention following DES-PCI significantly influences the occurrence of MACEs at 1, 3, and 6 months. GCS may be appropriately advanced within the 6-month timeframe, but with the exception of emergency, efforts should be made to defer them beyond the initial month.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1724-1734"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002199","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: We aim to investigate the optimal timing for surgical interventions to maximize patient benefit.

Background: The guidelines recommending a minimum deferral of 6 months for non-cardiac surgeries following drug-eluting stent percutaneous coronary intervention (DES-PCI) do not adequately address the requirements for individuals undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery (GCS).

Methods: The study encompassed 2501 patients treated from January 2017 to December 2021, all of whom underwent GCS within 1 year after DES-PCI. We conducted an analysis by comparing the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) within 30 days post-surgery at different time points.

Results: This study enrolled a total of 2501 participants with meticulously recorded data who underwent DES-PCI and subsequently underwent GCS within 1 year post-implantation. The incidence rate of MACEs is 14.2%, including MI (5.1%), HF (5.8%), IS (3.2%), and cardiac death (0.2%), across all patients in this study. The threshold probability was determined using the Youden Index, resulting in a value of 0.320, corresponding to a "time-to-surgery value" of 87. Significant statistical differences were observed in the occurrence rates of MACEs for adjacent time intervals at 30 days ( P < 0.001), 90 days ( P < 0.009), and 180 days ( P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The timing of surgical intervention following DES-PCI significantly influences the occurrence of MACEs at 1, 3, and 6 months. GCS may be appropriately advanced within the 6-month timeframe, but with the exception of emergency, efforts should be made to defer them beyond the initial month.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胃肠道肿瘤手术患者冠脉药物洗脱支架植入术后的手术干预时机:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
摘要:我们的目的是探讨手术干预的最佳时机,以最大限度地提高患者的利益。背景:指南建议药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(DES-PCI)后的非心脏手术至少延迟6个月,这并没有充分解决接受胃肠道肿瘤手术(GCS)的个体的要求。方法:该研究纳入了2017年1月至2021年12月期间接受治疗的2501例患者,所有患者均在DES-PCI术后一年内接受了GCS。我们通过比较不同时间点术后30天内主要心血管不良事件(mace)的发生情况进行分析。结果:本研究共招募了2501名参与者,详细记录了他们的数据,他们在植入后一年内接受了DES-PCI治疗并随后接受了GCS治疗。mace的发生率为14.2%,包括心肌梗死(5.1%)、心衰(5.8%)、is(3.2%)、心源性死亡(0.2%)。使用约登指数确定阈值概率,其值为0.320,对应于“手术时间值”为87。结论:DES-PCI术后1个月、3个月、6个月mace的发生受手术干预时间的影响显著。在6个月的时限内,可适当提前进行全球安全监测,但除紧急情况外,应努力将其推迟到最初一个月之后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
期刊最新文献
Predicting disease-free survival following curative-intent resection of right-sided colon cancer using a pre- and post-operative monogram: a prospective observational cohort study. Rectal cancer approach strategies after neoadjuvant treatment - a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Targeting Protein Kinase D in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a promising therapeutic approach. An updated systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of the efficacy and safety of en bloc transurethral resection vs. conventional transurethral resection for non-muscle-invasive bladder tumor. Application of acceptance and commitment therapy in cancer-related fatigue management: insights from clinical trials and future perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1