Valeria Gianell Olivera-Molina, Juan Carlo Maita-Durand, J Jhonnel Alarco
{"title":"Access to medicines and patient satisfaction in healthcare facilities: A cross-sectional study of a Peruvian population-based survey.","authors":"Valeria Gianell Olivera-Molina, Juan Carlo Maita-Durand, J Jhonnel Alarco","doi":"10.5867/medwave.2024.11.3004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Shortage of medicines in Peruvian healthcare facilities is a significant public health issue that may affect patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the association between access to medicines and the level of satisfaction with the received care from users of healthcare facilities in Peru during 2016.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the 2016 National Survey of User Satisfaction in Health (ENSUSALUD). Access to medicines at the healthcare facilities' pharmacy and patient satisfaction were measured using self-report questions. Crude and adjusted ordinal logistic regression models were used to estimate Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. The complex sample design of the 2016 National Health User Satisfaction Survey was considered in all calculations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 10 386 healthcare facility users were included. After receiving medical care, 19.6% had partial access to medications, 6.8% had no access, and 6% were dissatisfied with the care received. Users with partial access to drugs had 87% higher odds of dissatisfaction (Odds ratio: 1.87; 95% confidence interval: 1.56 to 2.23), while users without access to medications had 51% higher odds of dissatisfaction (OR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.16), compared to users with full access to drugs, adjusted for confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with limited access to medicine at pharmacies in Peruvian healthcare facilities reported higher dissatisfaction with the care received.</p>","PeriodicalId":18597,"journal":{"name":"Medwave","volume":"24 11","pages":"e3004"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medwave","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2024.11.3004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Shortage of medicines in Peruvian healthcare facilities is a significant public health issue that may affect patient satisfaction.
Objective: To estimate the association between access to medicines and the level of satisfaction with the received care from users of healthcare facilities in Peru during 2016.
Methods: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the 2016 National Survey of User Satisfaction in Health (ENSUSALUD). Access to medicines at the healthcare facilities' pharmacy and patient satisfaction were measured using self-report questions. Crude and adjusted ordinal logistic regression models were used to estimate Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. The complex sample design of the 2016 National Health User Satisfaction Survey was considered in all calculations.
Results: Data from 10 386 healthcare facility users were included. After receiving medical care, 19.6% had partial access to medications, 6.8% had no access, and 6% were dissatisfied with the care received. Users with partial access to drugs had 87% higher odds of dissatisfaction (Odds ratio: 1.87; 95% confidence interval: 1.56 to 2.23), while users without access to medications had 51% higher odds of dissatisfaction (OR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.16), compared to users with full access to drugs, adjusted for confounding variables.
Conclusions: Patients with limited access to medicine at pharmacies in Peruvian healthcare facilities reported higher dissatisfaction with the care received.
期刊介绍:
Medwave is a peer-reviewed, biomedical and public health journal. Since its foundation in 2001 (Volume 1) it has always been an online only, open access publication that does not charge subscription or reader fees. Since January 2011 (Volume 11, Number 1), all articles are peer-reviewed. Without losing sight of the importance of evidence-based approach and methodological soundness, the journal accepts for publication articles that focus on providing updates for clinical practice, review and analysis articles on topics such as ethics, public health and health policy; clinical, social and economic health determinants; clinical and health research findings from all of the major disciplines of medicine, medical science and public health. The journal does not publish basic science manuscripts or experiments conducted on animals. Until March 2013, Medwave was publishing 11-12 numbers a year. Each issue would be posted on the homepage on day 1 of each month, except for Chile’s summer holiday when the issue would cover two months. Starting from April 2013, Medwave adopted the continuous mode of publication, which means that the copyedited accepted articles are posted on the journal’s homepage as they are ready. They are then collated in the respective issue and included in the Past Issues section.