Long-Term Clinical and Biological Prognostic Factors of Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis in Children.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1212/NXI.0000000000200346
Maxime Mazowiecki, Lorraine Flet-Berliac, Julia Roux, Anne Lépine, Pascale Chretien, Salima Hacein-Bey-Abina, Laetitia Giorgi, Frederic Villega, Emmanuel Cheuret, Marie Benaiteau, Veronique Rogemond, Geraldine Picard, Sarah Baer, Pierre Cleuziou, Elodie Lametery, Isabelle Desguerre, Mélodie Aubart, Mathilde Chevignard, Roger Le Grand, Philippe Horellou, Carole Leroy, Bastien Joubert, Jerome Honnorat, Kumaran Deiva
{"title":"Long-Term Clinical and Biological Prognostic Factors of Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis in Children.","authors":"Maxime Mazowiecki, Lorraine Flet-Berliac, Julia Roux, Anne Lépine, Pascale Chretien, Salima Hacein-Bey-Abina, Laetitia Giorgi, Frederic Villega, Emmanuel Cheuret, Marie Benaiteau, Veronique Rogemond, Geraldine Picard, Sarah Baer, Pierre Cleuziou, Elodie Lametery, Isabelle Desguerre, Mélodie Aubart, Mathilde Chevignard, Roger Le Grand, Philippe Horellou, Carole Leroy, Bastien Joubert, Jerome Honnorat, Kumaran Deiva","doi":"10.1212/NXI.0000000000200346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Anti-NMDAR encephalitis (NMDARE) is a severe neurologic condition, and recently, the NMDAR Encephalitis One-Year Functional Status (NEOS) score has emerged as a 1-year prognostic tool. This study aimed to evaluate NEOS score and biomarker (neurofilament light chains [NfL], total-Tau protein, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and serum cytokines) correlation with modified Rankin Scale (mRS), cognitive impairment, and clinical recovery in pediatric NMDARE over 2 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this French multicenter observational study, 104 pediatric patients with NMDARE were followed for a minimum of 2 years. Clinical data and serum/plasma samples were collected. Biomarker levels, measured using electroluminescence mesoscale discovery (MSD) S-PLEX, were compared between patients and controls and assessed for correlations with disease activity, mRS, cognitive/language impairment, and recovery status at 2 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a median follow-up of 39.5 months, 68 percent of patients had unfavorable recovery and 54% had significant cognitive impairment. Both outcomes were strongly associated with younger age at diagnosis (OR 6.10 [1.91-27.3] <i>p</i> < 0.01 and 5.69 [1.46-27.7] <i>p</i> = 0.02, respectively). A higher NEOS score was significantly correlated with increased cognitive impairment (OR 2.53 [1.52-4.21], <i>p</i> < 0.001), higher mRS scores (OR 2.12 [1.34-3.57], <i>p</i> < 0.01), and unfavorable recovery at 2 years (OR 2.00 [1.30-3.06], <i>p</i> = 0.015). Elevated NfL levels were significantly associated with unfavorable recovery (OR 3.62 [1.29-10.9] <i>p</i> = 0.012) and severe cognitive impairment (OR 3.77 [1.38-10.9] <i>p</i> = 0.012) at 2 years. The combined area under the curve (AUC) for NfL and NEOS was significantly higher than the AUCs of NEOS and NfL alone <i>(p</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The NEOS score strongly predicts long-term outcomes in NMDARE, with its predictive value extending beyond the first-year mR prediction. NfL levels at disease onset seem to improve accuracy in predicting poor outcomes, providing valuable information for treatment decisions and future clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":19472,"journal":{"name":"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation","volume":"12 2","pages":"e200346"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000200346","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Anti-NMDAR encephalitis (NMDARE) is a severe neurologic condition, and recently, the NMDAR Encephalitis One-Year Functional Status (NEOS) score has emerged as a 1-year prognostic tool. This study aimed to evaluate NEOS score and biomarker (neurofilament light chains [NfL], total-Tau protein, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and serum cytokines) correlation with modified Rankin Scale (mRS), cognitive impairment, and clinical recovery in pediatric NMDARE over 2 years.

Methods: In this French multicenter observational study, 104 pediatric patients with NMDARE were followed for a minimum of 2 years. Clinical data and serum/plasma samples were collected. Biomarker levels, measured using electroluminescence mesoscale discovery (MSD) S-PLEX, were compared between patients and controls and assessed for correlations with disease activity, mRS, cognitive/language impairment, and recovery status at 2 years.

Results: At a median follow-up of 39.5 months, 68 percent of patients had unfavorable recovery and 54% had significant cognitive impairment. Both outcomes were strongly associated with younger age at diagnosis (OR 6.10 [1.91-27.3] p < 0.01 and 5.69 [1.46-27.7] p = 0.02, respectively). A higher NEOS score was significantly correlated with increased cognitive impairment (OR 2.53 [1.52-4.21], p < 0.001), higher mRS scores (OR 2.12 [1.34-3.57], p < 0.01), and unfavorable recovery at 2 years (OR 2.00 [1.30-3.06], p = 0.015). Elevated NfL levels were significantly associated with unfavorable recovery (OR 3.62 [1.29-10.9] p = 0.012) and severe cognitive impairment (OR 3.77 [1.38-10.9] p = 0.012) at 2 years. The combined area under the curve (AUC) for NfL and NEOS was significantly higher than the AUCs of NEOS and NfL alone (p = 0.01).

Discussion: The NEOS score strongly predicts long-term outcomes in NMDARE, with its predictive value extending beyond the first-year mR prediction. NfL levels at disease onset seem to improve accuracy in predicting poor outcomes, providing valuable information for treatment decisions and future clinical trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
219
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation is an official journal of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation will be the premier peer-reviewed journal in neuroimmunology and neuroinflammation. This journal publishes rigorously peer-reviewed open-access reports of original research and in-depth reviews of topics in neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation, affecting the full range of neurologic diseases including (but not limited to) Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, ALS, tauopathy, and stroke; multiple sclerosis and NMO; inflammatory peripheral nerve and muscle disease, Guillain-Barré and myasthenia gravis; nervous system infection; paraneoplastic syndromes, noninfectious encephalitides and other antibody-mediated disorders; and psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. Clinical trials, instructive case reports, and small case series will also be featured.
期刊最新文献
Abatacept Induces Long-Term Reconstitution of the B-Cell Niche in a Patient With CTLA-4 Haploinsufficiency: A Case Report. Clinical and Paraclinical Characterizations, Management, and Prognosis in DPPX Antibody-Associated Encephalitis: A Systematic Review. Clinical Characterization and Prognostic Risk Factors of Susac Syndrome: A Retrospective Multicenter Study. Long-Term Clinical and Biological Prognostic Factors of Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis in Children. "Lupus Myelitis" Revisited: A Retrospective Single-Center Study of Myelitis Associated With Rheumatologic Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1