Early results of transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) using invasive and non-invasive methods of mesh fixation.

Q4 Medicine Wiadomosci lekarskie Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.36740/WLek/197109
Artem V Trots, Oleksandr V Perekhrestenko
{"title":"Early results of transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) using invasive and non-invasive methods of mesh fixation.","authors":"Artem V Trots, Oleksandr V Perekhrestenko","doi":"10.36740/WLek/197109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aim: To evaluate the early postoperative results of surgical treatment of patients with inguinal hernias after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) using invasive and non-invasive methods of fixation of prosthetic material.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Materials and Methods: The study included 76 patients (average age 61,4±15,3 years; 69 [91 %] males, 7 [9 %] females) with primary uncomplicated unilateral inguinal hernias who underwent TAPP. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 - 52 patients in whom the AbsorbaTack fixation device was used to secure the mesh; group 2 - 24 patients in whom the LiquiBand FIX8 cyanoacrylate adhesive was used. In both groups, in the early postoperative period, the severity of pain according to Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and functional activity according to the standard Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results: The severity of pain syndrome, according to VAS score, in the cyanoacrylate glue group was lower starting from postoperative day 7 (1,4±0,7 vs. 1,8±0,6 in group 1, respectively; p=0,026). On postoperative day 30, the functional activity indicators were better in the cyanoacrylate glue group (mean CCS score was 13,3±4,2 vs. 23,3±7,4 points, respectively; p=0,001). There was no difference in the incidence of early postoperative complications among the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conclusions: Fixation of the mesh with cyanoacrylate glue during laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair is a safe and effective technique that helps to reduce the level of postoperative pain and provides better functional results in patients in the early postoperative period compared to traditional methods of mesh fixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23643,"journal":{"name":"Wiadomosci lekarskie","volume":"77 11","pages":"2265-2270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiadomosci lekarskie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek/197109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Aim: To evaluate the early postoperative results of surgical treatment of patients with inguinal hernias after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) using invasive and non-invasive methods of fixation of prosthetic material.

Patients and methods: Materials and Methods: The study included 76 patients (average age 61,4±15,3 years; 69 [91 %] males, 7 [9 %] females) with primary uncomplicated unilateral inguinal hernias who underwent TAPP. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 - 52 patients in whom the AbsorbaTack fixation device was used to secure the mesh; group 2 - 24 patients in whom the LiquiBand FIX8 cyanoacrylate adhesive was used. In both groups, in the early postoperative period, the severity of pain according to Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and functional activity according to the standard Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) were assessed.

Results: Results: The severity of pain syndrome, according to VAS score, in the cyanoacrylate glue group was lower starting from postoperative day 7 (1,4±0,7 vs. 1,8±0,6 in group 1, respectively; p=0,026). On postoperative day 30, the functional activity indicators were better in the cyanoacrylate glue group (mean CCS score was 13,3±4,2 vs. 23,3±7,4 points, respectively; p=0,001). There was no difference in the incidence of early postoperative complications among the groups.

Conclusion: Conclusions: Fixation of the mesh with cyanoacrylate glue during laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair is a safe and effective technique that helps to reduce the level of postoperative pain and provides better functional results in patients in the early postoperative period compared to traditional methods of mesh fixation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)采用有创和无创补片固定的早期结果。
目的:探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)术后早期采用有创与无创假体材料固定方法治疗腹股沟疝的效果。患者与方法:材料与方法:纳入76例患者,平均年龄61(4±15.3)岁;69例(91%)男性,7例(9%)女性)原发性单侧腹股沟疝行TAPP治疗。患者分为两组:1 - 52例患者使用AbsorbaTack固定装置固定补片;第2 ~ 24组采用LiquiBand FIX8型氰基丙烯酸酯胶粘剂。两组患者术后早期采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛程度,采用标准carolina Comfort Scale (CCS)评估功能活动。结果:根据VAS评分,从术后第7天开始,氰基丙烯酸酯胶组疼痛综合征的严重程度较低(分别为1,4±0,7∶1组为1,8±0,6;p = 0026)。术后第30天,氰基丙烯酸酯胶组功能活动指标更好(平均CCS评分分别为13.3±4,2分和23.3±7,4分;p = 0001)。两组术后早期并发症发生率无差异。结论:在腹腔镜下经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中应用氰基丙烯酸酯胶固定补片是一种安全有效的技术,与传统补片固定方法相比,可以降低术后疼痛水平,术后早期患者的功能效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wiadomosci lekarskie
Wiadomosci lekarskie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
482
期刊最新文献
Physical literacy in social work: current status and prospects implementation of foreign experience in Ukraine. Serological Detection of measles virus in association with IL-10 and IL-17 levels in aborted women. The effect of aluminum oxide air abrasion on composite adhesion to enamel and dentin: Literature review 2020-2024. The impact of COVID-19 on dental practice and care: Adapting to unprecedented times. Volitional qualities development in future law enforcement officers during various types of motor activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1