Machine Learning to Predict the Individual Risk of Treatment-Relevant Toxicity for Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment.
Lie Cai, Thomas M Deutsch, Chris Sidey-Gibbons, Michelle Kobel, Fabian Riedel, Katharina Smetanay, Carlo Fremd, Laura Michel, Michael Golatta, Joerg Heil, Andreas Schneeweiss, André Pfob
{"title":"Machine Learning to Predict the Individual Risk of Treatment-Relevant Toxicity for Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment.","authors":"Lie Cai, Thomas M Deutsch, Chris Sidey-Gibbons, Michelle Kobel, Fabian Riedel, Katharina Smetanay, Carlo Fremd, Laura Michel, Michael Golatta, Joerg Heil, Andreas Schneeweiss, André Pfob","doi":"10.1200/CCI.24.00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Toxicity to systemic cancer treatment represents a major anxiety for patients and a challenge to treatment plans. We aimed to develop machine learning algorithms for the upfront prediction of an individual's risk of experiencing treatment-relevant toxicity during the course of treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical records were retrieved from a single-center, consecutive cohort of patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment for early breast cancer. We developed and validated machine learning algorithms to predict grade 3 or 4 toxicity (anemia, neutropenia, deviation of liver enzymes, nephrotoxicity, thrombopenia, electrolyte disturbance, or neuropathy). We used 10-fold cross-validation to develop two algorithms (logistic regression with elastic net penalty [GLM] and support vector machines [SVMs]). Algorithm predictions were compared with documented toxicity events and diagnostic performance was evaluated via area under the curve (AUROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 590 patients were identified, 432 in the development set and 158 in the validation set. The median age was 51 years, and 55.8% (329 of 590) experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity. The performance improved significantly when adding referenced treatment information (referenced regimen, referenced summation dose intensity product) in addition to patient and tumor variables: GLM AUROC 0.59 versus 0.75, <i>P</i> = .02; SVM AUROC 0.64 versus 0.75, <i>P</i> = .01.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The individual risk of treatment-relevant toxicity can be predicted using machine learning algorithms. We demonstrate a promising way to improve efficacy and facilitate proactive toxicity management of systemic cancer treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2400010"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI.24.00010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Toxicity to systemic cancer treatment represents a major anxiety for patients and a challenge to treatment plans. We aimed to develop machine learning algorithms for the upfront prediction of an individual's risk of experiencing treatment-relevant toxicity during the course of treatment.
Methods: Clinical records were retrieved from a single-center, consecutive cohort of patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment for early breast cancer. We developed and validated machine learning algorithms to predict grade 3 or 4 toxicity (anemia, neutropenia, deviation of liver enzymes, nephrotoxicity, thrombopenia, electrolyte disturbance, or neuropathy). We used 10-fold cross-validation to develop two algorithms (logistic regression with elastic net penalty [GLM] and support vector machines [SVMs]). Algorithm predictions were compared with documented toxicity events and diagnostic performance was evaluated via area under the curve (AUROC).
Results: A total of 590 patients were identified, 432 in the development set and 158 in the validation set. The median age was 51 years, and 55.8% (329 of 590) experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity. The performance improved significantly when adding referenced treatment information (referenced regimen, referenced summation dose intensity product) in addition to patient and tumor variables: GLM AUROC 0.59 versus 0.75, P = .02; SVM AUROC 0.64 versus 0.75, P = .01.
Conclusion: The individual risk of treatment-relevant toxicity can be predicted using machine learning algorithms. We demonstrate a promising way to improve efficacy and facilitate proactive toxicity management of systemic cancer treatment.
目的:系统性癌症治疗的毒性是患者的主要焦虑,也是对治疗计划的挑战。我们的目标是开发机器学习算法,以提前预测个体在治疗过程中出现治疗相关毒性的风险。方法:从接受新辅助治疗的早期乳腺癌患者的单中心、连续队列中检索临床记录。我们开发并验证了机器学习算法来预测3级或4级毒性(贫血、中性粒细胞减少、肝酶偏离、肾毒性、血小板减少、电解质紊乱或神经病变)。我们使用10倍交叉验证来开发两种算法(弹性网络惩罚逻辑回归[GLM]和支持向量机[svm])。将算法预测与记录的毒性事件进行比较,并通过曲线下面积(AUROC)评估诊断性能。结果:共确定了590例患者,其中432例在开发组,158例在验证组。中位年龄为51岁,55.8%(590人中329人)出现3级或4级毒性。除患者和肿瘤变量外,添加参考治疗信息(参考方案、参考总剂量强度积)可显著提高疗效:GLM AUROC为0.59比0.75,P = 0.02;支持向量机AUROC为0.64 vs . 0.75, P = 0.01。结论:使用机器学习算法可以预测治疗相关毒性的个体风险。我们展示了一种有希望的方法来提高系统性癌症治疗的疗效和促进主动毒性管理。