Double-Butter: A Cementation Technique That Significantly Reduces Lipid Contamination of the Tibial Baseplate in Total Knee Arthroplasty

IF 2.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Arthroplasty Today Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.artd.2024.101574
Jacob M. Wilson MD , Aleksander P. Mika MD , William W. Gilbert MD , J. Bohannon Mason MD , Gregory G. Polkowski MD , J. Ryan Martin MD
{"title":"Double-Butter: A Cementation Technique That Significantly Reduces Lipid Contamination of the Tibial Baseplate in Total Knee Arthroplasty","authors":"Jacob M. Wilson MD ,&nbsp;Aleksander P. Mika MD ,&nbsp;William W. Gilbert MD ,&nbsp;J. Bohannon Mason MD ,&nbsp;Gregory G. Polkowski MD ,&nbsp;J. Ryan Martin MD","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Aseptic loosening is the most common aseptic failure modality following total knee arthroplasty. Recent literature suggests that the implant-cement interface is the “weak-link” in fixation and lipid contamination may drive this debonding pattern. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine if the “double-butter” technique would significantly decrease lipid contamination of the tibial tray.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Transparent acrylic models of 7 different tibial baseplates were created to allow for direct visualization of fluid contamination of the implant-cement interface during experimental cementation. Three cementation techniques were then employed in triplicate for each implant: coating only the tibia (“single butter”) and coating of the tibia and baseplate (with and without keel included; “double-butter”). A dye was added centrally to simulate lipid contamination. After each trial, the degree of implant-cement contamination was calculated. Standard statistical analyses were conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>With the double-butter technique, there was a significant reduction in contamination for all studied implant designs (range: 0%-7%; <em>P</em> &lt; .05) and contamination was eliminated when the entire implant was coated prior to implantation. The single-butter technique resulted in contamination of 16%-43% of the tibial undersurface. There were significant differences in percent contamination between component designs (<em>P</em> &lt; .05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Cementation technique and implant design each influenced baseplate lipid contamination. While significant differences were noted between keel geometries, we found that the double-butter technique effectively eliminated baseplate contamination, even in the most susceptible designs in this study. We therefore advocate for the incorporation of the double-butter technique to limit lipid contamination and potentially reduce aseptic tibial loosening.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 101574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124002590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Aseptic loosening is the most common aseptic failure modality following total knee arthroplasty. Recent literature suggests that the implant-cement interface is the “weak-link” in fixation and lipid contamination may drive this debonding pattern. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine if the “double-butter” technique would significantly decrease lipid contamination of the tibial tray.

Methods

Transparent acrylic models of 7 different tibial baseplates were created to allow for direct visualization of fluid contamination of the implant-cement interface during experimental cementation. Three cementation techniques were then employed in triplicate for each implant: coating only the tibia (“single butter”) and coating of the tibia and baseplate (with and without keel included; “double-butter”). A dye was added centrally to simulate lipid contamination. After each trial, the degree of implant-cement contamination was calculated. Standard statistical analyses were conducted.

Results

With the double-butter technique, there was a significant reduction in contamination for all studied implant designs (range: 0%-7%; P < .05) and contamination was eliminated when the entire implant was coated prior to implantation. The single-butter technique resulted in contamination of 16%-43% of the tibial undersurface. There were significant differences in percent contamination between component designs (P < .05).

Conclusions

Cementation technique and implant design each influenced baseplate lipid contamination. While significant differences were noted between keel geometries, we found that the double-butter technique effectively eliminated baseplate contamination, even in the most susceptible designs in this study. We therefore advocate for the incorporation of the double-butter technique to limit lipid contamination and potentially reduce aseptic tibial loosening.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双黄油:一种显著减少全膝关节置换术中胫骨基板脂质污染的骨水泥技术。
背景:无菌性松动是全膝关节置换术后最常见的无菌失败形式。最近的文献表明,种植体-骨水泥界面是固定的“薄弱环节”,脂质污染可能驱动这种脱粘模式。因此,本研究的目的是确定“双黄油”技术是否会显著减少胫骨托盘的脂质污染。方法:制作7种不同胫骨基板的透明丙烯酸模型,以便在实验固接过程中直接可视化种植体-骨水泥界面的流体污染。然后对每个植入物采用三种胶结技术:仅覆盖胫骨(“单一黄油”)和覆盖胫骨和底板(包括和不包括龙骨;“double-butter”)。在中心加入染料模拟脂质污染。每次试验结束后,计算种植体-水泥的污染程度。进行标准统计分析。结果:使用双黄油技术,所有研究的种植体设计的污染都显著减少(范围:0%-7%;P < 0.05),并且在植入前覆盖整个种植体时消除了污染。单黄油技术导致16%-43%的胫骨下表面污染。各组件设计的污染百分比差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:骨水泥技术和种植体设计对基板脂质污染均有影响。虽然龙骨几何形状之间存在显着差异,但我们发现双黄油技术有效地消除了底板污染,即使在本研究中最易受影响的设计中也是如此。因此,我们提倡合并双黄油技术,以限制脂质污染,并可能减少无菌胫骨松动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arthroplasty Today
Arthroplasty Today Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
258
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthroplasty Today is a companion journal to the Journal of Arthroplasty. The journal Arthroplasty Today brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement of the hip and knee in an open-access, online format. Arthroplasty Today solicits manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas of scientific endeavor that relate to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with patient outcomes, economic and policy issues, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, and biologic response to arthroplasty. The journal focuses on case reports. It is the purpose of Arthroplasty Today to present material to practicing orthopaedic surgeons that will keep them abreast of developments in the field, prove useful in the care of patients, and aid in understanding the scientific foundation of this subspecialty area of joint replacement. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal''s area of interest. Their participation ensures that each issue of Arthroplasty Today provides the reader with timely, peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality.
期刊最新文献
Systemic Cobalt Toxicity Secondary to Tibial Component Malpositioning in Bilateral Primary Total Knee Arthroplasties. Full Motion Arc, Laxity-Based Planning for Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Next Milestone for Enabling Technology. Parkinson's Disease Patients Face Higher 90-Day Readmission, Reoperation, and Infection Risk Following Total Knee Arthroplasty. Does Race Affect Utilization of Unicompartmental vs Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Matched Cohort Study Within a Universal Health System. Comparison of High-tensile Suture and 16-gauge Wire for Prophylactic Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1