Physiological versus time based cord clamping in very preterm infants (ABC3): a parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled superiority trial.

IF 13.6 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Lancet Regional Health-Europe Pub Date : 2024-12-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101146
Ronny Knol, Emma Brouwer, Thomas van den Akker, Philip L J DeKoninck, Wes Onland, Marijn J Vermeulen, Willem P de Boode, Anton H van Kaam, Enrico Lopriore, Irwin K M Reiss, G Jeroen Hutten, Sandra A Prins, Estelle E M Mulder, Esther J d'Haens, Christian V Hulzebos, Helene A Bouma, Sam J van Sambeeck, Hendrik J Niemarkt, Mayke E van der Putten, Tinta Lebon, Inge A Zonnenberg, Debbie H Nuytemans, Sten P Willemsen, Graeme R Polglase, Sylke J Steggerda, Stuart B Hooper, Arjan B Te Pas
{"title":"Physiological versus time based cord clamping in very preterm infants (ABC3): a parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled superiority trial.","authors":"Ronny Knol, Emma Brouwer, Thomas van den Akker, Philip L J DeKoninck, Wes Onland, Marijn J Vermeulen, Willem P de Boode, Anton H van Kaam, Enrico Lopriore, Irwin K M Reiss, G Jeroen Hutten, Sandra A Prins, Estelle E M Mulder, Esther J d'Haens, Christian V Hulzebos, Helene A Bouma, Sam J van Sambeeck, Hendrik J Niemarkt, Mayke E van der Putten, Tinta Lebon, Inge A Zonnenberg, Debbie H Nuytemans, Sten P Willemsen, Graeme R Polglase, Sylke J Steggerda, Stuart B Hooper, Arjan B Te Pas","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physiological-based cord clamping (PBCC) in preterm infants is beneficial for cardiovascular transition at birth and may optimize placental transfusion. Whether PBCC can improve clinical outcomes is unknown. The aim of the Aeration, Breathing, Clamping (ABC3) trial was to test whether PBCC results in improved intact survival in very preterm infants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ABC3 trial was a parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled superiority clinical trial conducted in all Dutch tertiary referral centers for perinatal care involving infants born before 30 weeks of gestation. Infants were randomised to either PBCC or time-based delayed cord clamping (TBCC), stratified by gestational age and treatment center. Infants receiving PBCC were stabilised with umbilical cord intact, which was clamped after reaching cardiorespiratory stability (heart rate >100 bpm and SpO2 >85% while supplemental oxygen <40%). In TBCC the cord was clamped after 30-60 s. The primary outcome was survival without major cerebral injury and/or necrotizing enterocolitis. The primary and key secondary analyses were done in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03808051).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>From January 25, 2019, through October 2, 2022, 669 infants were randomised (median gestational age 27<sup>+5</sup> weeks (IQR 26<sup>+2</sup>-28<sup>+6</sup>)) and included in the intention-to-treat population. Intact survival occurred in 241 of 339 infants (71.1%) after PBCC, compared with 223 of 330 (67.6%) after TBCC (odds ratio 1.18, 95% CI 0.84-1.66; absolute risk difference 3.1 %points, 95% CI -11.0 to 15.8, p = 0.33). Pre-specified subgroup analysis showed 69.9% intact survival in male infants after PBCC, compared with 61.8% after TBCC (odds ratio 2.32, 95% CI 1.42-3.78, p for interaction 0.026). Secondary outcomes showed fewer red blood cell transfusions after PBCC (rate ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.75-0.92, p = 0.0003), lower incidence of late-onset sepsis (27.4% versus 33.3%, odds ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.95, p = 0.013) and lower admission temperature (36.3 °C versus 36.7 °C, mean difference -0.5, 95% CI -0.8 to -0.3, p < 0.0001). Parents were less anxious (Likert scale 1.52 (SD 0.97) versus 2.23 (SD 1.35); p < 0.001) and more content (Likert scale 4.74 (SD 0.75) versus 4.49 (SD 0.97); p < 0.001) after PBCC.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>PBCC in very preterm infants did not increase survival without major cerebral injury or necrotizing enterocolitis compared to TBCC in the entire cohort. A possible beneficial effect in male infants requires confirmation from other trials. PBCC was safe to perform and parents reported more contentment and less anxiety.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development.</p>","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":"48 ","pages":"101146"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664066/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physiological-based cord clamping (PBCC) in preterm infants is beneficial for cardiovascular transition at birth and may optimize placental transfusion. Whether PBCC can improve clinical outcomes is unknown. The aim of the Aeration, Breathing, Clamping (ABC3) trial was to test whether PBCC results in improved intact survival in very preterm infants.

Methods: The ABC3 trial was a parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled superiority clinical trial conducted in all Dutch tertiary referral centers for perinatal care involving infants born before 30 weeks of gestation. Infants were randomised to either PBCC or time-based delayed cord clamping (TBCC), stratified by gestational age and treatment center. Infants receiving PBCC were stabilised with umbilical cord intact, which was clamped after reaching cardiorespiratory stability (heart rate >100 bpm and SpO2 >85% while supplemental oxygen <40%). In TBCC the cord was clamped after 30-60 s. The primary outcome was survival without major cerebral injury and/or necrotizing enterocolitis. The primary and key secondary analyses were done in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03808051).

Findings: From January 25, 2019, through October 2, 2022, 669 infants were randomised (median gestational age 27+5 weeks (IQR 26+2-28+6)) and included in the intention-to-treat population. Intact survival occurred in 241 of 339 infants (71.1%) after PBCC, compared with 223 of 330 (67.6%) after TBCC (odds ratio 1.18, 95% CI 0.84-1.66; absolute risk difference 3.1 %points, 95% CI -11.0 to 15.8, p = 0.33). Pre-specified subgroup analysis showed 69.9% intact survival in male infants after PBCC, compared with 61.8% after TBCC (odds ratio 2.32, 95% CI 1.42-3.78, p for interaction 0.026). Secondary outcomes showed fewer red blood cell transfusions after PBCC (rate ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.75-0.92, p = 0.0003), lower incidence of late-onset sepsis (27.4% versus 33.3%, odds ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.95, p = 0.013) and lower admission temperature (36.3 °C versus 36.7 °C, mean difference -0.5, 95% CI -0.8 to -0.3, p < 0.0001). Parents were less anxious (Likert scale 1.52 (SD 0.97) versus 2.23 (SD 1.35); p < 0.001) and more content (Likert scale 4.74 (SD 0.75) versus 4.49 (SD 0.97); p < 0.001) after PBCC.

Interpretation: PBCC in very preterm infants did not increase survival without major cerebral injury or necrotizing enterocolitis compared to TBCC in the entire cohort. A possible beneficial effect in male infants requires confirmation from other trials. PBCC was safe to perform and parents reported more contentment and less anxiety.

Funding: The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生理与时间为基础的脐带夹紧在非常早产儿(ABC3):一个平行组,多中心,随机,对照优势试验。
背景:生理性脐带夹紧(PBCC)对早产儿出生时的心血管过渡有益,并可能优化胎盘输血。PBCC是否能改善临床结果尚不清楚。充气、呼吸、夹持(ABC3)试验的目的是测试PBCC是否能改善极早产儿的完整生存。方法:ABC3试验是一项平行组、多中心、随机、对照的优势临床试验,在荷兰所有三级转诊中心进行围产期护理,涉及妊娠30周前出生的婴儿。根据胎龄和治疗中心,将婴儿随机分为PBCC组或基于时间的延迟脐带夹紧(TBCC)组。接受PBCC的婴儿在脐带完整的情况下稳定,在达到心肺稳定(心率>00 bpm, SpO2 >85%,同时补充氧气)后夹住脐带。研究结果:从2019年1月25日到2022年10月2日,669名婴儿被随机分配(中位胎龄27+5周(IQR 26+2-28+6)),并纳入意向治疗人群。339例PBCC患儿中有241例(71.1%)存活,而330例TBCC患儿中有223例(67.6%)存活(优势比1.18,95% CI 0.84-1.66;绝对风险差3.1个百分点,95% CI -11.0 ~ 15.8, p = 0.33)。预先指定的亚组分析显示,PBCC后男婴的完整生存率为69.9%,TBCC后为61.8%(优势比2.32,95% CI 1.42-3.78, p为相互作用0.026)。次要结果显示,PBCC后红细胞输注减少(比率比0.83,95% CI 0.75-0.92, p = 0.0003),迟发性脓毒症发生率降低(27.4%对33.3%,比值比0.77,95% CI 0.62-0.95, p = 0.013),入院温度降低(36.3°C对36.7°C,平均差值-0.5,95% CI -0.8 - -0.3, p)解释:在整个队列中,与TBCC相比,极早产儿的PBCC并没有增加无严重脑损伤或坏死性小肠结肠炎的生存率。对男性婴儿可能有益的效果需要其他试验的证实。PBCC是安全的,父母报告更多的满足感和更少的焦虑。资助:荷兰卫生研究与发展组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
260
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Europe, a gold open access journal, is part of The Lancet's global effort to promote healthcare quality and accessibility worldwide. It focuses on advancing clinical practice and health policy in the European region to enhance health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research advocating changes in clinical practice and health policy. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces on regional health topics, such as infection and disease prevention, healthy aging, and reducing health disparities.
期刊最新文献
We need evidence-based futility thresholds to transplant grade-3 acute on chronic liver failure patients with poor respiratory, haemodynamic, and metabolic parameters. Dynamic association of antimicrobial resistance in urinary isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae between primary care and hospital settings in the Netherlands (2008-2020): a population-based study. Second primary non-myeloid malignancies following intensive treatment for adult acute myeloid leukaemia: a Danish population-based cohort study. Call me by MY name: the PassepartouT∗, a new tool to prevent misgendering and outing. Association between gut microbiome profiles and host metabolic health across the life course: a population-based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1