Did organs precede organisms in the origin of life?

microLife Pub Date : 2024-12-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/femsml/uqae025
Fernando Baquero, Gabriel S Bever, Victor de Lorenzo, Val Fernández-Lanza, Carlos Briones
{"title":"Did organs precede organisms in the origin of life?","authors":"Fernando Baquero, Gabriel S Bever, Victor de Lorenzo, Val Fernández-Lanza, Carlos Briones","doi":"10.1093/femsml/uqae025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evolutionary processes acting on populations of organized molecules preceded the origin of living organisms. These prebiotic entities were independently and repeatedly produced [i.e. (re)-produced] by the assembly of their components, following an iterative process giving rise to nearly but not fully identical replicas, allowing for a prebiotic form of Darwinian evolution. Natural selection favored the more persistent assemblies, some possibly modifying their own internal structure, or even their environment, thereby acquiring function. We refer to these assemblies as proto-organs. In association with other assemblies (e.g. in a coacervate or encapsulated within a vesicle), such proto-organs could evolve and acquire a role within the collective when their coexistence favored the selection of the ensemble. Along millions of years, an extraordinarily small number of successful combinations of those proto-organs co-occurring in spatially individualizing compartments might have co-evolved forming a proto-metabolic and proto-genetic informative network, eventually leading to the selfreplication of a very few. Thus, interactions between encapsulated proto-organs would have had a much higher probability of evolving into proto-organisms than interactions among simpler molecules. Multimolecular forms evolve functions; thus, functional organs would have preceded organisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":74189,"journal":{"name":"microLife","volume":"5 ","pages":"uqae025"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"microLife","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsml/uqae025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evolutionary processes acting on populations of organized molecules preceded the origin of living organisms. These prebiotic entities were independently and repeatedly produced [i.e. (re)-produced] by the assembly of their components, following an iterative process giving rise to nearly but not fully identical replicas, allowing for a prebiotic form of Darwinian evolution. Natural selection favored the more persistent assemblies, some possibly modifying their own internal structure, or even their environment, thereby acquiring function. We refer to these assemblies as proto-organs. In association with other assemblies (e.g. in a coacervate or encapsulated within a vesicle), such proto-organs could evolve and acquire a role within the collective when their coexistence favored the selection of the ensemble. Along millions of years, an extraordinarily small number of successful combinations of those proto-organs co-occurring in spatially individualizing compartments might have co-evolved forming a proto-metabolic and proto-genetic informative network, eventually leading to the selfreplication of a very few. Thus, interactions between encapsulated proto-organs would have had a much higher probability of evolving into proto-organisms than interactions among simpler molecules. Multimolecular forms evolve functions; thus, functional organs would have preceded organisms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在生命的起源中,器官先于有机体吗?
作用于有组织分子群体的进化过程早于生物体的起源。这些益生元实体通过其组件的组装而独立地重复产生[即(重新)产生],经过一个迭代过程,产生了几乎相同但不完全相同的复制品,从而允许达尔文进化的益生元形式。自然选择倾向于更持久的组合,其中一些可能会改变自己的内部结构,甚至是环境,从而获得功能。我们把这些组合称为原始器官。当这些原始器官与其他集合(如凝聚体或囊泡内)结合在一起时,当它们的共存有利于集合的选择时,这些原始器官可以进化并在集体中获得一个角色。在数百万年的时间里,那些在空间个体化隔间中共同出现的原始器官的极少数成功组合可能共同进化形成了一个原始代谢和原始遗传信息网络,最终导致极少数器官的自我复制。因此,被封装的原始器官之间的相互作用比简单分子之间的相互作用更有可能进化成原始生物体。多分子形态进化功能;因此,功能器官应该先于有机体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"French Phage Network" annual conference-eighth meeting report. Correction to: Compiling a versatile toolbox for inducible gene expression in Methanosarcina mazei. Metagenomic analysis of pristine oil sheds new light on the global distribution of microbial genetic repertoire in hydrocarbon-associated ecosystems. Functional characterization of the DUF1127-containing small protein YjiS of Salmonella Typhimurium. Subtilosin A production is influenced by surfactin levels in Bacillus subtilis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1