Optimizing fertilization rate can maintain the greenhouse gas mitigation effect of no-tillage: A global-scale meta-analysis

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Field Crops Research Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109720
Jia Zeng , Xing Wang , Yu Li , Liheng Xing , Xiangyang Li , Qi Zhang , Hanyu Liu , Yingyi Liu , Weichao Liu , Yongzhong Feng , Xiaojiao Wang , Chengjie Ren , Gaihe Yang , Xinhui Han
{"title":"Optimizing fertilization rate can maintain the greenhouse gas mitigation effect of no-tillage: A global-scale meta-analysis","authors":"Jia Zeng ,&nbsp;Xing Wang ,&nbsp;Yu Li ,&nbsp;Liheng Xing ,&nbsp;Xiangyang Li ,&nbsp;Qi Zhang ,&nbsp;Hanyu Liu ,&nbsp;Yingyi Liu ,&nbsp;Weichao Liu ,&nbsp;Yongzhong Feng ,&nbsp;Xiaojiao Wang ,&nbsp;Chengjie Ren ,&nbsp;Gaihe Yang ,&nbsp;Xinhui Han","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>No-tillage (NT) is an important agricultural practice for mitigating global warming and the trade-offs between the environment and food security. However, it remains unclear how different management practices affect and regulate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and yields in NT systems.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We integrated 99 published publications from around the world to construct a dataset of 517 paired observations to assess the impact of different management practices on GHG emissions and yields of NT systems, and to identify optimal management practices.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Hierarchical nested models were used to more accurately quantify the effects of management practices on GHG emissions and yields in NT systems. Subgroup meta-analyses, mixed-effects meta-regression and weighted random forest analysis were used to explore the relationships between climate, crop type, soil texture, straw and fertiliser type, and GHG emissions and yields.</div></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><div>Fertilization (22 % and 117 %), straw return (19 % and 16 %), and the interaction between fertilization and straw return (59 % and 225 %) significantly increased CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions in NT systems, but had no effect on CH<sub>4</sub> emissions. Fertilization (30 %) and interaction between fertilization and straw return (94 %) significantly enhanced yield in NT systems, while straw return did not affect yield. GHG emissions were not significant at low straw return rates (≤ 4t·hm<sup>2</sup>). Under fertilization, organic fertilizers were more favourable than chemical fertilizers for reducing GHG emissions. In addition, dry and cold climate and soils with low silt (%) and high sand (%) content were more favourable for reducing CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions in NT systems. The meta-random forest showed that fertilization rate is the key factor in regulating CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions in NT systems. Low fertilization rate (nitrogen ≤ 140 kg·hm<sup>−2</sup>, phosphorus ≤ 40 kg·hm<sup>−2</sup>, potassium ≤ 50 kg·hm<sup>−2</sup>) maximized the maintenance the GHG mitigation effect of NT and increase yields by about 15 % compared to NT alone. The study highlighted the importance of optimising fertilization rates as the key to maintain the GHG mitigation effect and crop yield of NT.</div></div><div><h3>Implications or significance</h3><div>These findings will help optimise management practices in NT systems to reduce GHG emissions and create a win-win situation for the environment and food security.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"322 ","pages":"Article 109720"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429024004738","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

No-tillage (NT) is an important agricultural practice for mitigating global warming and the trade-offs between the environment and food security. However, it remains unclear how different management practices affect and regulate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and yields in NT systems.

Objective

We integrated 99 published publications from around the world to construct a dataset of 517 paired observations to assess the impact of different management practices on GHG emissions and yields of NT systems, and to identify optimal management practices.

Methods

Hierarchical nested models were used to more accurately quantify the effects of management practices on GHG emissions and yields in NT systems. Subgroup meta-analyses, mixed-effects meta-regression and weighted random forest analysis were used to explore the relationships between climate, crop type, soil texture, straw and fertiliser type, and GHG emissions and yields.

Results and conclusions

Fertilization (22 % and 117 %), straw return (19 % and 16 %), and the interaction between fertilization and straw return (59 % and 225 %) significantly increased CO2 and N2O emissions in NT systems, but had no effect on CH4 emissions. Fertilization (30 %) and interaction between fertilization and straw return (94 %) significantly enhanced yield in NT systems, while straw return did not affect yield. GHG emissions were not significant at low straw return rates (≤ 4t·hm2). Under fertilization, organic fertilizers were more favourable than chemical fertilizers for reducing GHG emissions. In addition, dry and cold climate and soils with low silt (%) and high sand (%) content were more favourable for reducing CO2 and N2O emissions in NT systems. The meta-random forest showed that fertilization rate is the key factor in regulating CO2 and N2O emissions in NT systems. Low fertilization rate (nitrogen ≤ 140 kg·hm−2, phosphorus ≤ 40 kg·hm−2, potassium ≤ 50 kg·hm−2) maximized the maintenance the GHG mitigation effect of NT and increase yields by about 15 % compared to NT alone. The study highlighted the importance of optimising fertilization rates as the key to maintain the GHG mitigation effect and crop yield of NT.

Implications or significance

These findings will help optimise management practices in NT systems to reduce GHG emissions and create a win-win situation for the environment and food security.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化施肥量可维持免耕温室气体减排效果:全球尺度的meta分析
免耕(NT)是缓解全球变暖和环境与粮食安全之间权衡的重要农业实践。然而,目前尚不清楚不同的管理实践如何影响和调节NT系统的温室气体排放和产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Field Crops Research
Field Crops Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
307
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on: √ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems, with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.
期刊最新文献
Selenium application enhances rice yield and strengthens the positive effects of elevated CO2 Temporal patterns of symbiotic nitrogen fixation and soil mineral nitrogen uptake differ among faba bean, chickpea, field pea and lentil Achieving co-benefits in enhancing rice productivity and mitigating the eco-environmental impacts through root zone precision nitrogen management in large-scale farms Crop rotation and nitrogen management achieve a trade-off among crop productivity, net income and soil CO2 emission in the Hexi Oasis irrigation area Improving wheat yield while reducing nutrient surplus by optimizing water-fertilizer management strategies in dryland of the Loess Plateau
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1