A Systematic Review on the Effectiveness and Safety of Combining Biostimulators with Botulinum Toxin, Dermal Fillers, and Energy-Based Devices.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1007/s00266-024-04627-5
Elias Tam, Jane Pang Suan Choo, Parinitha Rao, William Richard Webb, Jean D A Carruthers, Eqram Rahman
{"title":"A Systematic Review on the Effectiveness and Safety of Combining Biostimulators with Botulinum Toxin, Dermal Fillers, and Energy-Based Devices.","authors":"Elias Tam, Jane Pang Suan Choo, Parinitha Rao, William Richard Webb, Jean D A Carruthers, Eqram Rahman","doi":"10.1007/s00266-024-04627-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Aesthetic medicine has evolved towards minimally invasive procedures, with biostimulators like Poly-L-Lactic Acid (PLLA), Calcium Hydroxylapatite (CaHA), and Polycaprolactone (PCL) gaining attention for their role in collagen induction, improving skin texture, elasticity, and volume. Combining these agents with other treatments-such as botulinum toxin, dermal fillers, and energy-based devices (e.g. laser and radiofrequency therapies)-is hypothesised to provide enhanced aesthetic outcomes. However, studies on the efficacy and safety of these combinations remain sparse and methodologically varied, posing challenges in establishing definitive recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review adhered to PRISMA guidelines, involving a thorough literature search across PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The search included terms related to biostimulators and combination treatments. Studies meeting inclusion criteria reported clinical outcomes of combined biostimulator treatments, including effectiveness, safety, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. Key parameters extracted included treatment area, combination protocols, and outcomes. Data synthesis used a narrative approach due to variability in methodologies, treatment protocols, and outcome metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1,237 studies initially identified, 29 met the inclusion criteria. These studies included various combinations of biostimulators with botulinum toxin, dermal fillers, and energy-based devices, with sample sizes ranging from 10 to 350 subjects. Treatments combining CaHA or PLLA with energy-based modalities like high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), fractional lasers, and microneedling demonstrated notable improvements in skin texture, elasticity, and contouring, particularly in areas with ageing signs. Adverse events included erythema, bruising, and nodules in 15-30% of cases, with rare but severe complications such as granulomas and vascular occlusions. Management protocols for these events involved corticosteroids, hyaluronidase, or surgical intervention. The review also found a lack of molecular understanding of the synergistic mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The review underscores the potential benefits of combined treatments in aesthetic outcomes, though limitations like heterogeneous methodologies, small sample sizes, and inconsistent protocols impact the reliability of findings. Current literature lacks a molecular understanding of the mechanisms underlying these combinations, limiting insights into the longevity and safety of results. Future studies with standardised protocols, objective outcome measures, and detailed molecular analyses are essential for developing evidence-based recommendations for combining biostimulators with other treatments in aesthetic practice.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iv: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04627-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Aesthetic medicine has evolved towards minimally invasive procedures, with biostimulators like Poly-L-Lactic Acid (PLLA), Calcium Hydroxylapatite (CaHA), and Polycaprolactone (PCL) gaining attention for their role in collagen induction, improving skin texture, elasticity, and volume. Combining these agents with other treatments-such as botulinum toxin, dermal fillers, and energy-based devices (e.g. laser and radiofrequency therapies)-is hypothesised to provide enhanced aesthetic outcomes. However, studies on the efficacy and safety of these combinations remain sparse and methodologically varied, posing challenges in establishing definitive recommendations.

Methods: This systematic review adhered to PRISMA guidelines, involving a thorough literature search across PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The search included terms related to biostimulators and combination treatments. Studies meeting inclusion criteria reported clinical outcomes of combined biostimulator treatments, including effectiveness, safety, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. Key parameters extracted included treatment area, combination protocols, and outcomes. Data synthesis used a narrative approach due to variability in methodologies, treatment protocols, and outcome metrics.

Results: Out of 1,237 studies initially identified, 29 met the inclusion criteria. These studies included various combinations of biostimulators with botulinum toxin, dermal fillers, and energy-based devices, with sample sizes ranging from 10 to 350 subjects. Treatments combining CaHA or PLLA with energy-based modalities like high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), fractional lasers, and microneedling demonstrated notable improvements in skin texture, elasticity, and contouring, particularly in areas with ageing signs. Adverse events included erythema, bruising, and nodules in 15-30% of cases, with rare but severe complications such as granulomas and vascular occlusions. Management protocols for these events involved corticosteroids, hyaluronidase, or surgical intervention. The review also found a lack of molecular understanding of the synergistic mechanisms.

Conclusion: The review underscores the potential benefits of combined treatments in aesthetic outcomes, though limitations like heterogeneous methodologies, small sample sizes, and inconsistent protocols impact the reliability of findings. Current literature lacks a molecular understanding of the mechanisms underlying these combinations, limiting insights into the longevity and safety of results. Future studies with standardised protocols, objective outcome measures, and detailed molecular analyses are essential for developing evidence-based recommendations for combining biostimulators with other treatments in aesthetic practice.

Level of evidence iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物刺激剂与肉毒杆菌毒素、皮肤填充物和能量装置联合使用的有效性和安全性的系统综述。
导论:美容医学已经向微创手术发展,生物刺激剂如聚l -乳酸(PLLA)、钙羟基磷灰石(CaHA)和聚己内酯(PCL)因其在胶原诱导、改善皮肤质地、弹性和体积方面的作用而受到关注。将这些药物与其他治疗相结合,如肉毒杆菌毒素、皮肤填充剂和基于能量的设备(如激光和射频治疗),可以提供更好的美学效果。然而,关于这些组合的有效性和安全性的研究仍然很少,方法也各不相同,这对建立明确的建议提出了挑战。方法:本系统综述遵循PRISMA指南,对PubMed、MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane数据库进行了全面的文献检索。搜索包括与生物刺激剂和联合治疗相关的术语。符合纳入标准的研究报告了联合生物刺激剂治疗的临床结果,包括有效性、安全性、患者满意度和不良反应。提取的关键参数包括治疗区域、联合方案和结果。由于方法、治疗方案和结果指标的可变性,数据综合采用叙述方法。结果:在最初确定的1237项研究中,有29项符合纳入标准。这些研究包括肉毒杆菌毒素生物刺激剂、皮肤填充剂和能量装置的各种组合,样本量从10到350人不等。将CaHA或PLLA与基于能量的治疗方式(如高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)、分数激光和微针)相结合,可以显著改善皮肤质地、弹性和轮廓,特别是在有衰老迹象的区域。不良事件包括15-30%的病例出现红斑、瘀伤和结节,并伴有罕见但严重的并发症,如肉芽肿和血管闭塞。这些事件的处理方案包括皮质类固醇、透明质酸酶或手术干预。综述还发现缺乏对协同机制的分子理解。结论:该综述强调了联合治疗在美学结果方面的潜在益处,尽管方法不一致、样本量小、协议不一致等局限性影响了研究结果的可靠性。目前的文献缺乏对这些组合的分子机制的理解,限制了对结果的寿命和安全性的了解。未来的研究有标准化的方案,客观的结果测量和详细的分子分析,这对于在美学实践中将生物刺激剂与其他治疗相结合的循证建议是必不可少的。证据等级iv:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定一个证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www.springer.com/00266。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Extracorporeal Acoustic Shock Waves to Treat Complications of Polymethylmethacrylate. Experimental Study of the Biological Outcome After Free Transplantation of Autologous Auricular Cartilage. The Effectiveness of Bromelain on Oedema, Subconjunctival Haemorrhage, and Ecchymosis After Rhinoplasty: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Comparison of Complication Rates of Different Autologous Gluteal Augmentation Techniques in 185 Consecutive Body Lift Surgeries in Massive Weight Loss Patients. Discovery of the Ligament of Modiolus: Anatomical Insights and Clinical Relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1