Current status of toxicological research on stingless bees (Apidae, Meliponini): Important pollinators neglected by pesticides' regulations

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Science of the Total Environment Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178229
Gherardo Bogo , Martín P. Porrini , Ingrid Aguilar-Monge , Patricia Aldea-Sánchez , Grecia S. de Groot , Rodrigo A. Velarde , Aurora Xolalpa-Aroche , Diego E. Vázquez
{"title":"Current status of toxicological research on stingless bees (Apidae, Meliponini): Important pollinators neglected by pesticides' regulations","authors":"Gherardo Bogo ,&nbsp;Martín P. Porrini ,&nbsp;Ingrid Aguilar-Monge ,&nbsp;Patricia Aldea-Sánchez ,&nbsp;Grecia S. de Groot ,&nbsp;Rodrigo A. Velarde ,&nbsp;Aurora Xolalpa-Aroche ,&nbsp;Diego E. Vázquez","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Stingless bees (tribe Meliponini), comprising over 600 known species within the largest group of eusocial bees, play a critical role in ecosystem functioning through their pollination services. They contribute to the reproduction of numerous plant species, including many economically important crops such as cacao, coffee, and various fruits. Beyond their ecological significance, stingless bees hold cultural and economic importance for many native and rural communities, where they are managed for their honey, pollen, and propolis for nutritional and health purposes. The overwhelming majority of studies on pesticide toxicity and risk assessment on bees are conducted on the model species <em>Apis mellifera</em> in the United States and Europe, where stingless bees are absent. In May 2023, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) published its revised guidance document on the risk assessment of plant protection products (PPPs) for bees, including, beyond honey bees, other bee species from <em>Bombus</em> and <em>Osmia</em> genera. Despite the Meliponini widespread distribution in tropical and subtropical regions, the impact of pesticides on stingless bees remains largely unexplored. Here, we present a systematic review of stingless bee toxicological studies which highlights a substantial knowledge gap. Up to October of 2024, only 144 research articles on the effects of pesticides on Meliponini had been identified, 80 % of those were conducted in a single country (Brazil). The number of bee species and PPPs tested is extremely low, with just five species accounting for almost 50 % of the collected data and only 79 PPPs tested, among which biopesticides were the most common. Concerning the experimental methodologies, there is a significant lack of studies focusing on chronic exposure and field assays, as well as a scarcity of studies focusing on sublethal effects. Furthermore, we pinpoint to areas where research is needed for the development of risk assessment guidelines to protect these vital pollinators.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"959 ","pages":"Article 178229"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969724083876","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stingless bees (tribe Meliponini), comprising over 600 known species within the largest group of eusocial bees, play a critical role in ecosystem functioning through their pollination services. They contribute to the reproduction of numerous plant species, including many economically important crops such as cacao, coffee, and various fruits. Beyond their ecological significance, stingless bees hold cultural and economic importance for many native and rural communities, where they are managed for their honey, pollen, and propolis for nutritional and health purposes. The overwhelming majority of studies on pesticide toxicity and risk assessment on bees are conducted on the model species Apis mellifera in the United States and Europe, where stingless bees are absent. In May 2023, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) published its revised guidance document on the risk assessment of plant protection products (PPPs) for bees, including, beyond honey bees, other bee species from Bombus and Osmia genera. Despite the Meliponini widespread distribution in tropical and subtropical regions, the impact of pesticides on stingless bees remains largely unexplored. Here, we present a systematic review of stingless bee toxicological studies which highlights a substantial knowledge gap. Up to October of 2024, only 144 research articles on the effects of pesticides on Meliponini had been identified, 80 % of those were conducted in a single country (Brazil). The number of bee species and PPPs tested is extremely low, with just five species accounting for almost 50 % of the collected data and only 79 PPPs tested, among which biopesticides were the most common. Concerning the experimental methodologies, there is a significant lack of studies focusing on chronic exposure and field assays, as well as a scarcity of studies focusing on sublethal effects. Furthermore, we pinpoint to areas where research is needed for the development of risk assessment guidelines to protect these vital pollinators.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无刺蜜蜂毒理学研究现状:农药法规忽视的重要传粉媒介。
无刺蜂(Meliponini部落)由600多种已知物种组成,是最大的社会蜜蜂群体,通过授粉服务在生态系统功能中发挥关键作用。它们有助于许多植物物种的繁殖,包括许多经济上重要的作物,如可可、咖啡和各种水果。除了它们的生态意义外,无刺蜜蜂对许多土著和农村社区具有文化和经济意义,在那里它们被管理以获取蜂蜜、花粉和蜂胶,用于营养和健康目的。在美国和欧洲,绝大多数关于农药对蜜蜂的毒性和风险评估的研究都是针对无刺蜜蜂的模式物种蜜蜂Apis进行的。2023年5月,欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)发布了关于蜜蜂植物保护产品(PPPs)风险评估的修订指导文件,除蜜蜂外,还包括Bombus和Osmia属的其他蜜蜂物种。尽管无刺蜂在热带和亚热带地区广泛分布,但农药对无刺蜂的影响仍未得到充分研究。在这里,我们提出了一个系统的审查无刺蜜蜂毒理学研究,突出了一个实质性的知识差距。截至2024年10月,仅确定了144篇关于农药对梅利波尼虫影响的研究文章,其中80%是在一个国家(巴西)进行的。测试的蜜蜂种类和PPPs的数量极低,仅5个物种占收集数据的近50%,仅测试了79个PPPs,其中生物农药是最常见的。关于实验方法,严重缺乏关注慢性暴露和现场分析的研究,也缺乏关注亚致死效应的研究。此外,我们指出了需要研究的领域,以制定风险评估指南,以保护这些重要的传粉媒介。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
期刊最新文献
Predicting non-mixing river flow using data-driven approaches: A case study in the Menindee region in Australia. A comprehensive review on microplastics: Their presence in surface and ground water, environmental distribution, and impact on human and aquatic systems. Childhood exposure to multiple persistent organic pollutants and midlife cognitive function. Impact of cellulose digestion on the accuracy and reproducibility of microplastic and synthetic microfiber quantification. Organic carbon composition and preservation in macrotidal coastal wetland sediment: insights from biomarkers and isotopic signatures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1