Risk Factors for Gangrenous Cholecystitis and the Outcomes of Early Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Study of a Single-Center City General Hospital.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Acta medica Okayama Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.18926/AMO/67869
Mampei Yamashita, Takayuki Tanaka, Yorihisa Sumida, Shoto Yamazaki, Yuki Hara, Akiko Fukuda, Makoto Hisanaga, Koki Wakata, Masato Araki, Susumu Eguchi
{"title":"Risk Factors for Gangrenous Cholecystitis and the Outcomes of Early Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Study of a Single-Center City General Hospital.","authors":"Mampei Yamashita, Takayuki Tanaka, Yorihisa Sumida, Shoto Yamazaki, Yuki Hara, Akiko Fukuda, Makoto Hisanaga, Koki Wakata, Masato Araki, Susumu Eguchi","doi":"10.18926/AMO/67869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gangrenous cholecystitis (GC) is classified as moderate acute cholecystitis according to the Tokyo Guidelines from 2018 (TG18). We evaluated the risk factors for GC and the outcomes of early cholecystectomy. A total of 136 patients who underwent emergency cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis were retrospectively analyzed; 58 of these patients (42.6%) were diagnosed with GC (GC group) based on our retrospective pathologic diagnosis. We comparatively evaluated the patient backgrounds and surgical outcomes between the GC group and non-GC group. The GC group was significantly older and included more hypertensive patients than the non-GC group. The GC group was prescribed more antibiotics as initial treatment than the non-GC group, and they had more days between onset and surgery. The preoperative white blood cell count and C-reactive protein values were significantly higher in the GC group than in the non-GC group, and these values were predictive factors for GC. Cholecystectomy required a longer operation time and caused greater blood loss in the GC group. The GC group also had longer hospitalization times than the non-GC group; however, no significant differences were observed in terms of postoperative complications. In conclusion, gangrenous changes should be assessed when diagnosing cholecystitis, and appropriate treatment, such as surgery or drainage, should be undertaken.</p>","PeriodicalId":7017,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica Okayama","volume":"78 6","pages":"439-447"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica Okayama","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18926/AMO/67869","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gangrenous cholecystitis (GC) is classified as moderate acute cholecystitis according to the Tokyo Guidelines from 2018 (TG18). We evaluated the risk factors for GC and the outcomes of early cholecystectomy. A total of 136 patients who underwent emergency cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis were retrospectively analyzed; 58 of these patients (42.6%) were diagnosed with GC (GC group) based on our retrospective pathologic diagnosis. We comparatively evaluated the patient backgrounds and surgical outcomes between the GC group and non-GC group. The GC group was significantly older and included more hypertensive patients than the non-GC group. The GC group was prescribed more antibiotics as initial treatment than the non-GC group, and they had more days between onset and surgery. The preoperative white blood cell count and C-reactive protein values were significantly higher in the GC group than in the non-GC group, and these values were predictive factors for GC. Cholecystectomy required a longer operation time and caused greater blood loss in the GC group. The GC group also had longer hospitalization times than the non-GC group; however, no significant differences were observed in terms of postoperative complications. In conclusion, gangrenous changes should be assessed when diagnosing cholecystitis, and appropriate treatment, such as surgery or drainage, should be undertaken.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
坏疽性胆囊炎的危险因素及早期胆囊切除术的预后:一项单中心城市综合医院的回顾性研究
根据2018年东京指南(TG18),坏疽性胆囊炎(GC)被归类为中度急性胆囊炎。我们评估了胃癌的危险因素和早期胆囊切除术的结果。回顾性分析136例急性胆囊炎急诊胆囊切除术患者;其中58例(42.6%)经回顾性病理诊断为胃癌(GC组)。我们比较了胃癌组和非胃癌组的患者背景和手术结果。与非GC组相比,GC组明显更老,高血压患者也更多。与非GC组相比,GC组在初始治疗时使用了更多的抗生素,并且从发病到手术之间的时间更长。胃癌组术前白细胞计数和c反应蛋白值明显高于非胃癌组,这些值是胃癌的预测因素。GC组胆囊切除术手术时间较长,出血量较大。GC组住院时间较非GC组长;然而,在术后并发症方面,没有观察到显著差异。总之,在诊断胆囊炎时应评估坏疽性改变,并采取适当的治疗,如手术或引流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta medica Okayama
Acta medica Okayama 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Medica Okayama (AMO) publishes papers relating to all areas of basic and clinical medical science. Papers may be submitted by those not affiliated with Okayama University. Only original papers which have not been published or submitted elsewhere and timely review articles should be submitted. Original papers may be Full-length Articles or Short Communications. Case Reports are considered if they describe significant and substantial new findings. Preliminary observations are not accepted.
期刊最新文献
Closure of Ventricular Septal Rupture through a Left Thoracotomy in a Patient with a History of Esophageal Reconstruction. Partial versus Radical Nephrectomy for Small Renal Cancer: Comparative Propensity Score-Matching Analysis of Cardiovascular Event Risk. Risk Factors for Gangrenous Cholecystitis and the Outcomes of Early Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Study of a Single-Center City General Hospital. Secondary Polymyalgia Rheumatica Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Traumatic Neuroma Arising from Surgical Trauma during Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1