[Safety of closed traction appliance in the treatment of impacted anterior teeth and its effect on pulp blood flow and masticatory function].

Q4 Medicine 上海口腔医学 Pub Date : 2024-10-01
Qi Zhu, Wei Zhao, Hua-Ying Wu
{"title":"[Safety of closed traction appliance in the treatment of impacted anterior teeth and its effect on pulp blood flow and masticatory function].","authors":"Qi Zhu, Wei Zhao, Hua-Ying Wu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the safety of closed traction appliance in the treatment of impacted anterior teeth and its effect on pulp blood flow and masticatory function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 80 patients with impacted anterior teeth who received treatment from January 2017 to December 2022 were selected, and randomly divided into experimental group and control group with 40 cases in each group. The two groups of patients were treated with occlusion adjustment and orthodontic traction. Closed traction was used in the experimental group, while open traction was used in the control group. The clinical efficacy, treatment duration, chewing ability, root length, periroot bone density, dental aesthetic score, pulp blood flow at different time points and the occurrence of adverse events were compared between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 22.0 software package.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total effective rate was 95.00% in the experimental group and 90.00% in the control group, with no significant difference(P>0.05). There was significant difference in traction eruption time and orthodontic time between the two groups(P<0.05). There were significant differences in masticatory efficiency, bite force and masticatory pain score between the two groups before and after treatment(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in root length and periroot bone density between the two groups before and after treatment(P>0.05). There was no significant difference in white aesthetic score between the two groups before and after treatment(P> 0.05), but there was significant difference in red aesthetic score between the two groups before and after treatment(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in pulp blood flow between the two groups at each time point(P>0.05). At T1, the pulp blood flow reached its peak higher than T0; at T2, it rapidly decreased below T1 but higher than T0; at T3, it gradually decreased below T1 and T2 but higher than T0(P<0.05). The incidence of adverse events in the experimental group was 10.00% compared with 27.50% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both closed traction and open traction correction can effectively treat the impacted anterior teeth, and the two methods have no significant effects on root length, surrounding bone density and pulp blood flow. Although the treatment time of closed traction is slightly longer, it is more beneficial to improve patients' masticatory ability, and has high aesthetics and safety, which is worthy of clinical promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":21709,"journal":{"name":"上海口腔医学","volume":"33 5","pages":"517-522"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"上海口腔医学","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the safety of closed traction appliance in the treatment of impacted anterior teeth and its effect on pulp blood flow and masticatory function.

Methods: A total of 80 patients with impacted anterior teeth who received treatment from January 2017 to December 2022 were selected, and randomly divided into experimental group and control group with 40 cases in each group. The two groups of patients were treated with occlusion adjustment and orthodontic traction. Closed traction was used in the experimental group, while open traction was used in the control group. The clinical efficacy, treatment duration, chewing ability, root length, periroot bone density, dental aesthetic score, pulp blood flow at different time points and the occurrence of adverse events were compared between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 22.0 software package.

Results: The total effective rate was 95.00% in the experimental group and 90.00% in the control group, with no significant difference(P>0.05). There was significant difference in traction eruption time and orthodontic time between the two groups(P<0.05). There were significant differences in masticatory efficiency, bite force and masticatory pain score between the two groups before and after treatment(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in root length and periroot bone density between the two groups before and after treatment(P>0.05). There was no significant difference in white aesthetic score between the two groups before and after treatment(P> 0.05), but there was significant difference in red aesthetic score between the two groups before and after treatment(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in pulp blood flow between the two groups at each time point(P>0.05). At T1, the pulp blood flow reached its peak higher than T0; at T2, it rapidly decreased below T1 but higher than T0; at T3, it gradually decreased below T1 and T2 but higher than T0(P<0.05). The incidence of adverse events in the experimental group was 10.00% compared with 27.50% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).

Conclusions: Both closed traction and open traction correction can effectively treat the impacted anterior teeth, and the two methods have no significant effects on root length, surrounding bone density and pulp blood flow. Although the treatment time of closed traction is slightly longer, it is more beneficial to improve patients' masticatory ability, and has high aesthetics and safety, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
封闭牵引器治疗前牙阻生的安全性及其对牙髓血流和咀嚼功能的影响。
目的:分析封闭牵引器治疗前牙阻生的安全性及对牙髓血流和咀嚼功能的影响。方法:选取2017年1月~ 2022年12月接受治疗的前牙阻生患者80例,随机分为实验组和对照组,每组各40例。两组患者均行咬合调整和正畸牵引治疗。实验组采用闭式牵引,对照组采用开放式牵引。比较两组患者的临床疗效、治疗时间、咀嚼能力、牙根长度、根周骨密度、牙体美观评分、不同时间点牙髓血流及不良事件发生情况。采用SPSS 22.0软件包进行统计学分析。结果:实验组总有效率为95.00%,对照组总有效率为90.00%,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组患者牵引出牙时间、正畸时间比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前后两组患者咀嚼效率、咬合力、咀嚼疼痛评分比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前后两组根长、根周骨密度比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组患者治疗前后白色美学评分差异无统计学意义(P<0.05),红色美学评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组各时间点牙髓血流量差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。T1时,牙髓血流达到峰值,高于T0;在T2时,它迅速下降,低于T1,但高于T0;T3时低于T1和T2逐渐降低,但高于T0(P<0.05)。实验组不良事件发生率为10.00%,对照组为27.50%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:封闭牵引和开放牵引矫正均能有效治疗前牙阻生,两种方法对牙根长度、周围骨密度和牙髓血流无明显影响。闭式牵引的治疗时间虽稍长,但更有利于提高患者的咀嚼能力,且具有较高的美观性和安全性,值得临床推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
上海口腔医学
上海口腔医学 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5299
期刊介绍: "Shanghai Journal of Stomatology (SJS)" is a comprehensive academic journal of stomatology directed by Shanghai Jiao Tong University and sponsored by the Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. The main columns include basic research, clinical research, column articles, clinical summaries, reviews, academic lectures, etc., which are suitable for reference by clinicians, scientific researchers and teaching personnel at all levels engaged in oral medicine.
期刊最新文献
[Expression and clinical significance of USP20 in oral squamous cell carcinoma]. [Metabolites differences between plaque biofilms of children with different levels of dental caries]. [Safety of closed traction appliance in the treatment of impacted anterior teeth and its effect on pulp blood flow and masticatory function]. [Analysis of root development of maxillary inverted impacted central incisor before and after orthodontic traction by CBCT]. [Analysis of temporomandibular joint imaging and orthodontic effect in patients with introverted deep overbite and severe attrition].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1