Investigation of functional connectivity differences based on anxiety tendencies.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-12-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1498612
Misuzu Oishi, Noriko Sakurai, Yuki Kawasaki, Kei Sasaki, Satoshi Kasai, Naoki Kodama
{"title":"Investigation of functional connectivity differences based on anxiety tendencies.","authors":"Misuzu Oishi, Noriko Sakurai, Yuki Kawasaki, Kei Sasaki, Satoshi Kasai, Naoki Kodama","doi":"10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1498612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anxiety is an emotion necessary for human survival. However, persistent and excessive anxiety can be clinically challenging. Increased anxiety affects daily life and requires early detection and intervention. Therefore, a better understanding of the neural basis of mild anxiety is needed. However, previous studies have focused primarily on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) in patients with psychiatric disorders presenting with anxiety. Notably, only a few studies have been conducted on healthy participants, and the relationship between anxiety and functional brain connectivity in the healthy range remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to clarify the differences in functional brain connectivity at different degrees of anxiety among healthy participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 48 healthy participants with no history of psychiatric disorders. Participants were administered The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) 60, a psychological test for assessing anxiety, and the Manifest Anxiety Scale (MAS). The participants then underwent rs-fMRI. Based on the results of each psychological test, the participants were classified into normal and anxiety groups, and the functional connectivity between the two groups was compared using a seed-to-voxel analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison of functional brain connectivity between the normal and anxiety groups classified based on the GHQ60 and MAS revealed differences between brain regions comprising the salience network (SN) in both psychological tests. For the GHQ60, the anxiety group showed reduced connectivity between the right supramarginal gyrus and insular cortex compared with the normal group. However, for the MAS, the anxiety group showed reduced connectivity between the right supramarginal and anterior cingulate cortical gyri compared with the normal group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Functional connectivity within the SN was reduced in the group with higher anxiety when functional brain connectivity at different anxiety levels was examined in healthy participants. This suggests that anxiety is involved in changes in the functional brain connectivity associated with emotional processing and cognitive control.</p>","PeriodicalId":12368,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":"18 ","pages":"1498612"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11666370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1498612","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Anxiety is an emotion necessary for human survival. However, persistent and excessive anxiety can be clinically challenging. Increased anxiety affects daily life and requires early detection and intervention. Therefore, a better understanding of the neural basis of mild anxiety is needed. However, previous studies have focused primarily on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) in patients with psychiatric disorders presenting with anxiety. Notably, only a few studies have been conducted on healthy participants, and the relationship between anxiety and functional brain connectivity in the healthy range remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to clarify the differences in functional brain connectivity at different degrees of anxiety among healthy participants.

Methods: This study included 48 healthy participants with no history of psychiatric disorders. Participants were administered The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) 60, a psychological test for assessing anxiety, and the Manifest Anxiety Scale (MAS). The participants then underwent rs-fMRI. Based on the results of each psychological test, the participants were classified into normal and anxiety groups, and the functional connectivity between the two groups was compared using a seed-to-voxel analysis.

Results: Comparison of functional brain connectivity between the normal and anxiety groups classified based on the GHQ60 and MAS revealed differences between brain regions comprising the salience network (SN) in both psychological tests. For the GHQ60, the anxiety group showed reduced connectivity between the right supramarginal gyrus and insular cortex compared with the normal group. However, for the MAS, the anxiety group showed reduced connectivity between the right supramarginal and anterior cingulate cortical gyri compared with the normal group.

Conclusion: Functional connectivity within the SN was reduced in the group with higher anxiety when functional brain connectivity at different anxiety levels was examined in healthy participants. This suggests that anxiety is involved in changes in the functional brain connectivity associated with emotional processing and cognitive control.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying behavior. Field Chief Editor Nuno Sousa at the Instituto de Pesquisa em Ciências da Vida e da Saúde (ICVS) is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. This journal publishes major insights into the neural mechanisms of animal and human behavior, and welcomes articles studying the interplay between behavior and its neurobiological basis at all levels: from molecular biology and genetics, to morphological, biochemical, neurochemical, electrophysiological, neuroendocrine, pharmacological, and neuroimaging studies.
期刊最新文献
Developmental improvements in the ability to benefit from testing across middle childhood. Novel automated method to assess group dynamics reveals deficits in behavioral contagion in rats with social deficits. Abnormal c-Fos expression in TetTag mice containing fos-EGFP. Selective deletion of Tsc1 from mouse cerebellar Purkinje neurons drives sex-specific behavioral impairments linked to autism. Animacy processing by distributed and interconnected networks in the temporal cortex of monkeys.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1