SEED-AN and a non-specialised, severe mental illness (SMI) community treatment model: perspectives of professionals and patients of a QoL-focussed treatment.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Eating Disorders Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1186/s40337-024-01172-z
Laura Schut, Marc Godschalk, Martie de Jong
{"title":"SEED-AN and a non-specialised, severe mental illness (SMI) community treatment model: perspectives of professionals and patients of a QoL-focussed treatment.","authors":"Laura Schut, Marc Godschalk, Martie de Jong","doi":"10.1186/s40337-024-01172-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Improving care for SEED-AN patients is urgently needed. Current specialist eating disorder (SEDU) programs have minimal impact, resulting in poor quality of life. Flexible assertive community treatment (FACT) focuses on improving the quality of life of people with severe mental illness.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study systematically examined professionals' and patients' experiences with existing care for SEED AN in two settings in two health districts in the Netherlands. Specifically, the specialised Eating Disorder Unit and FACT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative approach was used: Twelve professionals participated in focus groups, and four professionals and six patients were interviewed individually. Reflective thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were constructed: \"We feel ignorant in the treatment of SEED-AN patients\"; \"There is a disability to act\"; \"We are more than executive practitioners alone\"; and \"The professionals at FACT have given me back my confidence in treatment\". The findings reflect how support for SEED-AN patients is provided by both FACT and SEDU professionals and how SEED-AN patients experience the FACT approach.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A resource group model promotes collaboration among professionals, patients and the patient's support system. The model is expected to increase knowledge about SEED-AN among stakeholders who support the quality of life of SEED-AN patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"12 1","pages":"213"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-024-01172-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Improving care for SEED-AN patients is urgently needed. Current specialist eating disorder (SEDU) programs have minimal impact, resulting in poor quality of life. Flexible assertive community treatment (FACT) focuses on improving the quality of life of people with severe mental illness.

Aim: This study systematically examined professionals' and patients' experiences with existing care for SEED AN in two settings in two health districts in the Netherlands. Specifically, the specialised Eating Disorder Unit and FACT.

Methods: A qualitative approach was used: Twelve professionals participated in focus groups, and four professionals and six patients were interviewed individually. Reflective thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.

Results: Four themes were constructed: "We feel ignorant in the treatment of SEED-AN patients"; "There is a disability to act"; "We are more than executive practitioners alone"; and "The professionals at FACT have given me back my confidence in treatment". The findings reflect how support for SEED-AN patients is provided by both FACT and SEDU professionals and how SEED-AN patients experience the FACT approach.

Discussion: A resource group model promotes collaboration among professionals, patients and the patient's support system. The model is expected to increase knowledge about SEED-AN among stakeholders who support the quality of life of SEED-AN patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Eating Disorders
Journal of Eating Disorders Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
17.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Eating Disorders is the first open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing leading research in the science and clinical practice of eating disorders. It disseminates research that provides answers to the important issues and key challenges in the field of eating disorders and to facilitate translation of evidence into practice. The journal publishes research on all aspects of eating disorders namely their epidemiology, nature, determinants, neurobiology, prevention, treatment and outcomes. The scope includes, but is not limited to anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder and other eating disorders. Related areas such as important co-morbidities, obesity, body image, appetite, food and eating are also included. Articles about research methodology and assessment are welcomed where they advance the field of eating disorders.
期刊最新文献
Do empirically-derived personality subtypes relate to cognitive inflexibility in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa? SEED-AN and a non-specialised, severe mental illness (SMI) community treatment model: perspectives of professionals and patients of a QoL-focussed treatment. Binge eating as an emotional response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a sequential mediation model via the impact of events and social anxiety. Clinical and genetic associations for night eating syndrome in a patient biobank. Determinants of binge eating and its impact on indicators of obesity among Finnish adolescents - a cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1