On the uniqueness of fern–insect interactions

IF 8.1 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES New Phytologist Pub Date : 2024-12-25 DOI:10.1111/nph.20361
Robert J. Marquis
{"title":"On the uniqueness of fern–insect interactions","authors":"Robert J. Marquis","doi":"10.1111/nph.20361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ferns are believed to have first emerged at least 423 million years ago (Ma) (Nitta <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>). By contrast, the majority of flowering plant diversity appeared 50–100 Ma (Benton <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>). This much earlier appearance of ferns allows for the possibility of a long and unique evolutionary history, first running before, and then parallel with that of angiosperm–herbivorous insect interactions. There was a burst of fern diversification contemporaneous with that of flowering plants that led to 80% of the current fern diversity. The earliest fern and fern relatives were subject to herbivory only by insects with sucking and piercing mouthparts, but by the end of the Pennsylvanian, some 300 Ma, most major types of herbivore feeding had evolved to include chewing, sucking and piercing, boring, galling, and spore consumption (Labandeira, <span>2002</span>).</p><p>Initial analyses in the 1970–1980's suggested that present-day ferns, relative to angiosperms, are underutilized by herbivorous insects (Cooper-Driver, <span>1978</span>; Auerbach &amp; Hendrix, <span>1980</span>; Hendrix, <span>1980</span>). This underutilization was both surprising and perplexing in light of <i>a priori</i> predictions based on available information (Hendrix, <span>1980</span>). First, because ferns are relatively ancient, we would expect them to be attacked by an insect fauna more diverse than those found on angiosperms, having accumulated more species over their longer evolutionary history (the ‘time hypothesis’ of Southwood) (Hendrix, <span>1980</span>). Second, we would expect that fern insect faunas would be comprised of more ancient insect taxa of herbivorous insects than angiosperms (Cooper-Driver, <span>1978</span>). Finally, initial studies revealed a lower diversity of defensive compounds in ferns (Cooper-Driver, <span>1978</span>), again leading to the prediction of a more diverse herbivore fauna on ferns and greater damage compared to angiosperms. Contrary to expectations, studies found equal or fewer numbers of insect species attacking ferns than angiosperms of similar architecture (Auerbach &amp; Hendrix, <span>1980</span>). Furthermore, fern herbivore faunas did not appear to include ancient insect taxa (Hendrix, <span>1980</span>; but see Tahvanainen &amp; Niemelä, <span>1987</span>), and damage levels were similar in ferns and angiosperms (Hendrix &amp; Marquis, <span>1983</span>).</p><p>Porto <i>et al</i>. address many of these issues and more. They found that different orders of herbivorous insects cluster within the fern phylogeny, with Diptera (flies) being the most specialized. Along with Diptera, Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths), Coleoptera (beetles) and fern-associated Hymenoptera (sawflies and ants) are more specialized, while Hemiptera (aphids and aphid relatives) and Orthoptera (grasshoppers and katydids) are less so. Specialized interactions were more frequent for fern species growing in low-to-mid elevation tropical locations, that is, sites with high precipitation, high temperature, and low-variability climates. Specialization of herbivorous insects is the hallmark of tropical insect herbivores feeding on angiosperms (Forister <i>et al</i>., <span>2015</span>). Fern-feeding insects appear to be similar in this respect.</p><p>Porto <i>et al</i>. conclude that the herbivore faunas of ferns are a mix of species varying in age of origin: Lepidoptera and Coleoptera that switched relatively recently from angiosperms to ferns (see Hendrix, <span>1980</span>), and more ancient associations with Hemiptera and Orthoptera, supporting Cooper-Driver (<span>1978</span>)'s initial proposal. These results mirror the results of studies of three Hymenoptera lineages (i.e. sawflies) whose larvae feed only on ferns (Schneider, <span>2016</span>). Two families of fern sawflies represent ancient associations with ferns that evolved before the origin of the angiosperms, while a third is a lineage that switched over from angiosperms after their diversification (Schneider, <span>2016</span>).</p><p>Porto <i>et al</i>. give us a clearer picture of the degree of specificity of insects feeding on ferns today (see also Fuentes-Jacques <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>). But we still have no answer as to whether ferns host fewer herbivore species than angiosperms, and whether those species are more or less specialized than the average herbivore attacking angiosperms. Answering these questions will require further comparative analyses.</p><p>By contrast, the question of whether fern defenses against herbivores are unique is becoming clearer with recent research. Extrafloral nectaries (EFNs) attract ants, and the ants, in turn, often bother, scare away or ingest insect herbivores. As a result, ants can benefit both individual angiosperm plants and fern plants (Rico-Gray &amp; Oliveira, <span>2008</span>). EFNs arose approximately contemporaneously in the two taxa, <i>c</i>. 132 Ma in flowering plants and <i>c</i>. 135 Ma in ferns (Suissa <i>et al</i>., <span>2024</span>). Diversification followed EFN evolution in ferns, but there was a 100 million year lag between the time of EFN appearance in ferns and the surge in diversification (Suissa <i>et al</i>., <span>2024</span>). Perhaps this diversification was driven by the colonization of ferns by herbivores from angiosperms. This possibility suggests that insect herbivores had a hand in the diversification of ferns (Suissa <i>et al</i>., <span>2024</span>) as has been proposed for angiosperms. The specifics of how such herbivore-driven speciation would take place are still being debated (Marquis <i>et al</i>., <span>2016</span>; Maron <i>et al</i>., <span>2019</span>). Ants that visit EFNs may also have played a role in fern speciation. It is interesting to note that the percentage of plant species that produce EFNs is 1% in both ferns and angiosperms (Suissa <i>et al</i>., <span>2024</span>). Thus, ferns are no less nor more likely to be defended by ants than are flowering plants.</p><p>Whether chemical defenses against herbivores are reduced in ferns remains unclear. While studies of their herbivore faunas have continued to accumulate, studies of fern secondary chemistry are still less common (Castrejón-Varela <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>). Ferns have unique compounds not found in angiosperms (Wei <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>), and there are compounds in angiosperms that appear to be completely absent or nearly so in ferns (Castrejón-Varela <i>et al</i>., <span>2022</span>). Like angiosperms, ferns often have tough tissue, spines, and hairs, all shown to protect angiosperms against herbivore attack. Complete metabolic profiles, including secondary compounds, are becoming easier to acquire and analyze, but it seems that very few fern species have been profiled in this way (Wei <i>et al</i>., <span>2023</span>). Once such data are available, it will be possible to answer if and how fern chemistry differs from that of flowering plants, and how these compounds contribute to the structuring of fern herbivore assemblages and the damage they cause. Completely overlooked is the impact of the wide diversity of leaf morphology and size, plant size, deciduousness, and habitat among fern species. These factors have been shown to influence herbivore damage in angiosperms (see review by Chaves <i>et al</i>., <span>2025</span>). Along with the role of chemistry, the impact of these additional factors on the assembly of fern herbivore faunas awaits testing.</p><p>A very important contribution of papers by Porto <i>et al</i>. and Fuentes-Jacques <i>et al</i>. (<span>2022</span>) is to refocus our attention on the mysteries of interactions between the more than 12 000 extant species of ferns and their insect herbivores. Additional sampling of these interactions is especially needed in the tropics. Herbivores have been surveyed for only 3.5% of all fern species (Porto <i>et al</i>., <span>2025</span>), and most of these are of temperate species (Schneider, <span>2016</span>; Porto <i>et al</i>., <span>2025</span>). Focused sampling of interactions, carried out in a phylogenetic context for both ferns and insects, would seem to be the most productive. It would also be revealing to compare fern clades that evolved before the appearance of angiosperms with those that evolved subsequent to their appearance.</p><p>Porto <i>et al</i>. point out the need to focus research and conservation efforts on tropical ferns and their insect associates, representing both the most specialized and the least studied interactions. Fern–insect interactions that occur in low-to-mid elevation tropical forests are predicted to be the most vulnerable to climate change because of their narrow climatic niches (Grinder &amp; Wiens, <span>2023</span>). The vulnerability of fern–insect interactions represents one more example of a potential loss of unique ecological interactions before the participants have been documented.</p><p>The New Phytologist Foundation remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in maps and in any institutional affiliations.</p>","PeriodicalId":214,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":"246 2","pages":"386-388"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/nph.20361","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.20361","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ferns are believed to have first emerged at least 423 million years ago (Ma) (Nitta et al., 2022). By contrast, the majority of flowering plant diversity appeared 50–100 Ma (Benton et al., 2022). This much earlier appearance of ferns allows for the possibility of a long and unique evolutionary history, first running before, and then parallel with that of angiosperm–herbivorous insect interactions. There was a burst of fern diversification contemporaneous with that of flowering plants that led to 80% of the current fern diversity. The earliest fern and fern relatives were subject to herbivory only by insects with sucking and piercing mouthparts, but by the end of the Pennsylvanian, some 300 Ma, most major types of herbivore feeding had evolved to include chewing, sucking and piercing, boring, galling, and spore consumption (Labandeira, 2002).

Initial analyses in the 1970–1980's suggested that present-day ferns, relative to angiosperms, are underutilized by herbivorous insects (Cooper-Driver, 1978; Auerbach & Hendrix, 1980; Hendrix, 1980). This underutilization was both surprising and perplexing in light of a priori predictions based on available information (Hendrix, 1980). First, because ferns are relatively ancient, we would expect them to be attacked by an insect fauna more diverse than those found on angiosperms, having accumulated more species over their longer evolutionary history (the ‘time hypothesis’ of Southwood) (Hendrix, 1980). Second, we would expect that fern insect faunas would be comprised of more ancient insect taxa of herbivorous insects than angiosperms (Cooper-Driver, 1978). Finally, initial studies revealed a lower diversity of defensive compounds in ferns (Cooper-Driver, 1978), again leading to the prediction of a more diverse herbivore fauna on ferns and greater damage compared to angiosperms. Contrary to expectations, studies found equal or fewer numbers of insect species attacking ferns than angiosperms of similar architecture (Auerbach & Hendrix, 1980). Furthermore, fern herbivore faunas did not appear to include ancient insect taxa (Hendrix, 1980; but see Tahvanainen & Niemelä, 1987), and damage levels were similar in ferns and angiosperms (Hendrix & Marquis, 1983).

Porto et al. address many of these issues and more. They found that different orders of herbivorous insects cluster within the fern phylogeny, with Diptera (flies) being the most specialized. Along with Diptera, Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths), Coleoptera (beetles) and fern-associated Hymenoptera (sawflies and ants) are more specialized, while Hemiptera (aphids and aphid relatives) and Orthoptera (grasshoppers and katydids) are less so. Specialized interactions were more frequent for fern species growing in low-to-mid elevation tropical locations, that is, sites with high precipitation, high temperature, and low-variability climates. Specialization of herbivorous insects is the hallmark of tropical insect herbivores feeding on angiosperms (Forister et al., 2015). Fern-feeding insects appear to be similar in this respect.

Porto et al. conclude that the herbivore faunas of ferns are a mix of species varying in age of origin: Lepidoptera and Coleoptera that switched relatively recently from angiosperms to ferns (see Hendrix, 1980), and more ancient associations with Hemiptera and Orthoptera, supporting Cooper-Driver (1978)'s initial proposal. These results mirror the results of studies of three Hymenoptera lineages (i.e. sawflies) whose larvae feed only on ferns (Schneider, 2016). Two families of fern sawflies represent ancient associations with ferns that evolved before the origin of the angiosperms, while a third is a lineage that switched over from angiosperms after their diversification (Schneider, 2016).

Porto et al. give us a clearer picture of the degree of specificity of insects feeding on ferns today (see also Fuentes-Jacques et al., 2022). But we still have no answer as to whether ferns host fewer herbivore species than angiosperms, and whether those species are more or less specialized than the average herbivore attacking angiosperms. Answering these questions will require further comparative analyses.

By contrast, the question of whether fern defenses against herbivores are unique is becoming clearer with recent research. Extrafloral nectaries (EFNs) attract ants, and the ants, in turn, often bother, scare away or ingest insect herbivores. As a result, ants can benefit both individual angiosperm plants and fern plants (Rico-Gray & Oliveira, 2008). EFNs arose approximately contemporaneously in the two taxa, c. 132 Ma in flowering plants and c. 135 Ma in ferns (Suissa et al., 2024). Diversification followed EFN evolution in ferns, but there was a 100 million year lag between the time of EFN appearance in ferns and the surge in diversification (Suissa et al., 2024). Perhaps this diversification was driven by the colonization of ferns by herbivores from angiosperms. This possibility suggests that insect herbivores had a hand in the diversification of ferns (Suissa et al., 2024) as has been proposed for angiosperms. The specifics of how such herbivore-driven speciation would take place are still being debated (Marquis et al., 2016; Maron et al., 2019). Ants that visit EFNs may also have played a role in fern speciation. It is interesting to note that the percentage of plant species that produce EFNs is 1% in both ferns and angiosperms (Suissa et al., 2024). Thus, ferns are no less nor more likely to be defended by ants than are flowering plants.

Whether chemical defenses against herbivores are reduced in ferns remains unclear. While studies of their herbivore faunas have continued to accumulate, studies of fern secondary chemistry are still less common (Castrejón-Varela et al., 2022). Ferns have unique compounds not found in angiosperms (Wei et al., 2023), and there are compounds in angiosperms that appear to be completely absent or nearly so in ferns (Castrejón-Varela et al., 2022). Like angiosperms, ferns often have tough tissue, spines, and hairs, all shown to protect angiosperms against herbivore attack. Complete metabolic profiles, including secondary compounds, are becoming easier to acquire and analyze, but it seems that very few fern species have been profiled in this way (Wei et al., 2023). Once such data are available, it will be possible to answer if and how fern chemistry differs from that of flowering plants, and how these compounds contribute to the structuring of fern herbivore assemblages and the damage they cause. Completely overlooked is the impact of the wide diversity of leaf morphology and size, plant size, deciduousness, and habitat among fern species. These factors have been shown to influence herbivore damage in angiosperms (see review by Chaves et al., 2025). Along with the role of chemistry, the impact of these additional factors on the assembly of fern herbivore faunas awaits testing.

A very important contribution of papers by Porto et al. and Fuentes-Jacques et al. (2022) is to refocus our attention on the mysteries of interactions between the more than 12 000 extant species of ferns and their insect herbivores. Additional sampling of these interactions is especially needed in the tropics. Herbivores have been surveyed for only 3.5% of all fern species (Porto et al., 2025), and most of these are of temperate species (Schneider, 2016; Porto et al., 2025). Focused sampling of interactions, carried out in a phylogenetic context for both ferns and insects, would seem to be the most productive. It would also be revealing to compare fern clades that evolved before the appearance of angiosperms with those that evolved subsequent to their appearance.

Porto et al. point out the need to focus research and conservation efforts on tropical ferns and their insect associates, representing both the most specialized and the least studied interactions. Fern–insect interactions that occur in low-to-mid elevation tropical forests are predicted to be the most vulnerable to climate change because of their narrow climatic niches (Grinder & Wiens, 2023). The vulnerability of fern–insect interactions represents one more example of a potential loss of unique ecological interactions before the participants have been documented.

The New Phytologist Foundation remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in maps and in any institutional affiliations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论蕨类植物与昆虫相互作用的独特性
蕨类植物被认为至少在4.23亿年前首次出现(Ma) (Nitta et al., 2022)。相比之下,大部分开花植物多样性出现在50-100 Ma (Benton et al., 2022)。蕨类植物出现的时间要早得多,这使得它们有可能经历一段漫长而独特的进化史,首先是在被子植物与食草昆虫的相互作用之前,然后与之平行。与开花植物同时出现的蕨类植物多样性爆发导致了目前蕨类植物多样性的80%。最早的蕨类和蕨类近亲只以具有吸吮和刺穿口器的昆虫为食,但到宾夕法尼亚末期,大约300年前,大多数主要的食草动物的喂养方式已经进化到包括咀嚼、吸吮和刺穿、钻孔、刺痛和孢子消耗(Labandeira, 2002)。1970-1980年代的初步分析表明,相对于被子植物,现在的蕨类植物未被食草昆虫充分利用(Cooper-Driver, 1978;奥尔巴赫,亨德里克斯,1980;亨德里克斯,1980)。鉴于基于现有信息的先验预测,这种利用不足既令人惊讶又令人困惑(Hendrix, 1980)。首先,由于蕨类植物相对古老,我们预计它们会受到比被子植物更多样化的昆虫群的攻击,在它们更长的进化历史中积累了更多的物种(Southwood的“时间假说”)(Hendrix, 1980)。其次,我们预计蕨类昆虫动物群将由比被子植物更古老的食草昆虫类群组成(Cooper-Driver, 1978)。最后,最初的研究表明蕨类植物中防御化合物的多样性较低(Cooper-Driver, 1978),这再次导致了蕨类植物食草动物群的多样性和与被子植物相比更大的伤害的预测。与预期相反的是,研究发现攻击蕨类植物的昆虫种类与类似结构的被子植物数量相等或更少(奥尔巴赫&amp;亨德里克斯,1980)。此外,蕨类食草动物群似乎不包括古代昆虫类群(Hendrix, 1980;但见塔瓦纳宁&amp;Niemelä, 1987),蕨类植物和被子植物的损害程度相似(Hendrix &amp;侯爵,1983)。Porto等人解决了许多这样的问题,甚至更多。他们发现不同目的食草昆虫聚集在蕨类系统发育中,双翅目(苍蝇)是最专业化的。与双翅目一样,鳞翅目(蝴蝶和飞蛾)、鞘翅目(甲虫)和与蕨类有关的膜翅目(锯蝇和蚂蚁)更专业化,而半翅目(蚜虫和蚜虫亲戚)和直翅目(蚱蜢和蝈蝈)则不那么专业化。生长在低至中海拔热带地区(即高降水、高温和低变率气候的地区)的蕨类植物的特化相互作用更为频繁。食草昆虫的特化是热带食草昆虫以被子植物为食的标志(Forister et al., 2015)。以蕨类植物为食的昆虫在这方面似乎是相似的。Porto等人得出结论,蕨类植物的食草动物群是不同起源年龄的物种的混合体:鳞翅目和鞘翅目相对较晚才从被子植物转变为蕨类(见Hendrix, 1980),以及更古老的半翅目和直翅目联系,支持cooperdriver(1978)的最初建议。这些结果反映了三种膜翅目谱系(即锯蝇)的研究结果,其幼虫仅以蕨类植物为食(Schneider, 2016)。蕨类锯蝇的两个家族代表了在被子植物起源之前进化的蕨类植物的古老关联,而第三个家族是在被子植物多样化后从被子植物切换过来的一个谱系(Schneider, 2016)。Porto等人让我们更清楚地了解了当今以蕨类植物为食的昆虫的特异性程度(另见Fuentes-Jacques et al., 2022)。但是对于蕨类植物是否比被子植物拥有更少的食草物种,以及这些物种是否比一般的食草动物攻击被子植物更专门化,我们仍然没有答案。回答这些问题需要进一步的比较分析。相比之下,最近的研究表明,蕨类植物对食草动物的防御能力是否独一无二的问题正变得越来越清晰。花外蜜腺(efn)吸引蚂蚁,而蚂蚁,反过来,经常打扰,吓跑或吞食昆虫食草动物。因此,蚂蚁对被子植物和蕨类植物都有好处。奥利维拉,2008)。efn在两个分类群中几乎同时出现,开花植物约为132 Ma,蕨类植物约为135 Ma (Suissa et al., 2024)。在蕨类植物中,EFN进化之后出现了多样化,但在蕨类植物中EFN出现的时间与多样化激增之间存在1亿年的滞后(Suissa et al., 2024)。也许这种多样化是由被子植物的食草动物对蕨类植物的殖民所驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Phytologist
New Phytologist 生物-植物科学
自引率
5.30%
发文量
728
期刊介绍: New Phytologist is an international electronic journal published 24 times a year. It is owned by the New Phytologist Foundation, a non-profit-making charitable organization dedicated to promoting plant science. The journal publishes excellent, novel, rigorous, and timely research and scholarship in plant science and its applications. The articles cover topics in five sections: Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology. These sections encompass intracellular processes, global environmental change, and encourage cross-disciplinary approaches. The journal recognizes the use of techniques from molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches in plant science. Abstracting and Indexing Information for New Phytologist includes Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Agroforestry Abstracts, Biochemistry & Biophysics Citation Index, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Environment Index, Global Health, and Plant Breeding Abstracts, and others.
期刊最新文献
AGP and EXO-LIKE genes promote brassinosteroid-dependent anisotropic growth Arabidopsis acclimation to daily environmental fluctuations converts a defense response regulator into a susceptibility factor toward Sclerotinia. Gap-free genome-based analyses of the origin and adaptation of a globally invasive polyploid hydrophyte. Heteromorphic XY chromosomes with pericentromeric recombination suppression in Hippophae (Elaeagnaceae). Functional uncoupling of the induced defense-competitive growth trade-off.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1