Bone Regeneration After Sinus Floor Elevation in an Intact Sinus or a Sinus With Prior Large Membrane Perforation: A Preclinical Study Using a Rabbit Sinus Model

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Clinical Periodontology Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1111/jcpe.14108
Sunmin Lee, Jong‐Hyuk Chung, Daniel S. Thoma, Ronald E. Jung, Ui‐Won Jung, Seung‐Yun Shin, Hyun‐Chang Lim
{"title":"Bone Regeneration After Sinus Floor Elevation in an Intact Sinus or a Sinus With Prior Large Membrane Perforation: A Preclinical Study Using a Rabbit Sinus Model","authors":"Sunmin Lee, Jong‐Hyuk Chung, Daniel S. Thoma, Ronald E. Jung, Ui‐Won Jung, Seung‐Yun Shin, Hyun‐Chang Lim","doi":"10.1111/jcpe.14108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimTo determine bone regeneration following sinus floor elevation (SFE) at sites with or without prior sinus membrane perforation.Materials and MethodsThe sinus membranes in the maxillary sinuses of 12 rabbits were intentionally perforated (≥ 5 mm) on one side, followed by application of a collagen matrix. SFE was performed on both sinuses after 8 weeks of healing, presenting two groups: SFE with a previous large sinus membrane perforation (group SFE_Perf), and in an intact sinus (group SFE). The animals were euthanized at 2 and 4 weeks after SFE. Micro‐computed tomographic and histomorphometric analyses were performed.ResultsThe amount of newly formed bone within the augmented area did not differ significantly between the two groups at 2 weeks and 4 weeks (4.7 ± 1.0 mm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> vs. 5.3 ± 1.4 mm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> and 9.2 ± 1.7 mm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> vs. 10.8 ± 2.2 mm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>, respectively, mean ± SD; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &gt; 0.05). However, the amount of newly formed bone near the middle of the sinus membranes was significantly greater in group SFE than in group SFE_Perf (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in the augmented volume. Fewer subepithelial glands and denser collagen fibres within the sinus membranes were observed in group SFE_Perf than in group SFE.ConclusionsA large perforation of the sinus membrane followed by an 8‐week healing period did not jeopardize new bone formation following SFE.","PeriodicalId":15380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.14108","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AimTo determine bone regeneration following sinus floor elevation (SFE) at sites with or without prior sinus membrane perforation.Materials and MethodsThe sinus membranes in the maxillary sinuses of 12 rabbits were intentionally perforated (≥ 5 mm) on one side, followed by application of a collagen matrix. SFE was performed on both sinuses after 8 weeks of healing, presenting two groups: SFE with a previous large sinus membrane perforation (group SFE_Perf), and in an intact sinus (group SFE). The animals were euthanized at 2 and 4 weeks after SFE. Micro‐computed tomographic and histomorphometric analyses were performed.ResultsThe amount of newly formed bone within the augmented area did not differ significantly between the two groups at 2 weeks and 4 weeks (4.7 ± 1.0 mm2 vs. 5.3 ± 1.4 mm2 and 9.2 ± 1.7 mm2 vs. 10.8 ± 2.2 mm2, respectively, mean ± SD; p > 0.05). However, the amount of newly formed bone near the middle of the sinus membranes was significantly greater in group SFE than in group SFE_Perf (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the augmented volume. Fewer subepithelial glands and denser collagen fibres within the sinus membranes were observed in group SFE_Perf than in group SFE.ConclusionsA large perforation of the sinus membrane followed by an 8‐week healing period did not jeopardize new bone formation following SFE.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
完整窦底抬高或先前有大膜穿孔的窦底抬高后骨再生:兔窦模型的临床前研究
目的探讨鼻窦底抬高术(SFE)对有或无鼻窦膜穿孔部位骨再生的影响。材料与方法12只兔上颌窦单侧故意穿孔(≥5mm),应用胶原基质。在愈合8周后对两个鼻窦进行SFE,分为两组:先前有较大鼻窦膜穿孔的SFE组(SFE_Perf组)和完整鼻窦(SFE组)。分别于术后2周和4周实施安乐死。进行了显微计算机断层扫描和组织形态学分析。结果2周和4周时两组增强区新骨形成量差异无统计学意义(分别为4.7±1.0 mm2 vs. 5.3±1.4 mm2和9.2±1.7 mm2 vs. 10.8±2.2 mm2,平均值±SD;p比;0.05)。然而,SFE组鼻窦膜中部附近的新成骨量明显大于SFE_Perf组(p <;0.05)。增大体积无显著性差异。与SFE组相比,SFE_Perf组上皮下腺体较少,窦膜内胶原纤维较致密。结论:大的窦膜穿孔和8周的愈合期不影响SFE术后新骨的形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Journal of Clinical Periodontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
10.40%
发文量
175
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Periodontology was founded by the British, Dutch, French, German, Scandinavian, and Swiss Societies of Periodontology. The aim of the Journal of Clinical Periodontology is to provide the platform for exchange of scientific and clinical progress in the field of Periodontology and allied disciplines, and to do so at the highest possible level. The Journal also aims to facilitate the application of new scientific knowledge to the daily practice of the concerned disciplines and addresses both practicing clinicians and academics. The Journal is the official publication of the European Federation of Periodontology but wishes to retain its international scope. The Journal publishes original contributions of high scientific merit in the fields of periodontology and implant dentistry. Its scope encompasses the physiology and pathology of the periodontium, the tissue integration of dental implants, the biology and the modulation of periodontal and alveolar bone healing and regeneration, diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and therapy of periodontal disease, the clinical aspects of tooth replacement with dental implants, and the comprehensive rehabilitation of the periodontal patient. Review articles by experts on new developments in basic and applied periodontal science and associated dental disciplines, advances in periodontal or implant techniques and procedures, and case reports which illustrate important new information are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Application of the 2018 Periodontal Status Classification to Epidemiological Survey Data (ACES) Framework to Estimate the Periodontitis Prevalence in the United States. Prevalence of Periodontitis in a 70-Year-Old Population in Western Norway According to the ACES 2018 Classification Framework: A Cross-Sectional Study. Comparison of the Histological Structure of an Anterior as well as a Posterior Biopsy From the Human Palate: A Comparative Study Molar Incisor Hypomineralization and Periodontitis in Adolescents: A Population‐Based Study LRP5 Down‐Regulation Exacerbates Inflammation and Alveolar Bone Loss in Periodontitis by Inhibiting PI3K/c‐FOS Signalling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1