Bone Regeneration After Sinus Floor Elevation in an Intact Sinus or a Sinus With Prior Large Membrane Perforation: A Preclinical Study Using a Rabbit Sinus Model
Sunmin Lee, Jong‐Hyuk Chung, Daniel S. Thoma, Ronald E. Jung, Ui‐Won Jung, Seung‐Yun Shin, Hyun‐Chang Lim
{"title":"Bone Regeneration After Sinus Floor Elevation in an Intact Sinus or a Sinus With Prior Large Membrane Perforation: A Preclinical Study Using a Rabbit Sinus Model","authors":"Sunmin Lee, Jong‐Hyuk Chung, Daniel S. Thoma, Ronald E. Jung, Ui‐Won Jung, Seung‐Yun Shin, Hyun‐Chang Lim","doi":"10.1111/jcpe.14108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimTo determine bone regeneration following sinus floor elevation (SFE) at sites with or without prior sinus membrane perforation.Materials and MethodsThe sinus membranes in the maxillary sinuses of 12 rabbits were intentionally perforated (≥ 5 mm) on one side, followed by application of a collagen matrix. SFE was performed on both sinuses after 8 weeks of healing, presenting two groups: SFE with a previous large sinus membrane perforation (group SFE_Perf), and in an intact sinus (group SFE). The animals were euthanized at 2 and 4 weeks after SFE. Micro‐computed tomographic and histomorphometric analyses were performed.ResultsThe amount of newly formed bone within the augmented area did not differ significantly between the two groups at 2 weeks and 4 weeks (4.7 ± 1.0 mm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> vs. 5.3 ± 1.4 mm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> and 9.2 ± 1.7 mm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> vs. 10.8 ± 2.2 mm<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>, respectively, mean ± SD; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> > 0.05). However, the amount of newly formed bone near the middle of the sinus membranes was significantly greater in group SFE than in group SFE_Perf (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the augmented volume. Fewer subepithelial glands and denser collagen fibres within the sinus membranes were observed in group SFE_Perf than in group SFE.ConclusionsA large perforation of the sinus membrane followed by an 8‐week healing period did not jeopardize new bone formation following SFE.","PeriodicalId":15380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.14108","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AimTo determine bone regeneration following sinus floor elevation (SFE) at sites with or without prior sinus membrane perforation.Materials and MethodsThe sinus membranes in the maxillary sinuses of 12 rabbits were intentionally perforated (≥ 5 mm) on one side, followed by application of a collagen matrix. SFE was performed on both sinuses after 8 weeks of healing, presenting two groups: SFE with a previous large sinus membrane perforation (group SFE_Perf), and in an intact sinus (group SFE). The animals were euthanized at 2 and 4 weeks after SFE. Micro‐computed tomographic and histomorphometric analyses were performed.ResultsThe amount of newly formed bone within the augmented area did not differ significantly between the two groups at 2 weeks and 4 weeks (4.7 ± 1.0 mm2 vs. 5.3 ± 1.4 mm2 and 9.2 ± 1.7 mm2 vs. 10.8 ± 2.2 mm2, respectively, mean ± SD; p > 0.05). However, the amount of newly formed bone near the middle of the sinus membranes was significantly greater in group SFE than in group SFE_Perf (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the augmented volume. Fewer subepithelial glands and denser collagen fibres within the sinus membranes were observed in group SFE_Perf than in group SFE.ConclusionsA large perforation of the sinus membrane followed by an 8‐week healing period did not jeopardize new bone formation following SFE.
目的探讨鼻窦底抬高术(SFE)对有或无鼻窦膜穿孔部位骨再生的影响。材料与方法12只兔上颌窦单侧故意穿孔(≥5mm),应用胶原基质。在愈合8周后对两个鼻窦进行SFE,分为两组:先前有较大鼻窦膜穿孔的SFE组(SFE_Perf组)和完整鼻窦(SFE组)。分别于术后2周和4周实施安乐死。进行了显微计算机断层扫描和组织形态学分析。结果2周和4周时两组增强区新骨形成量差异无统计学意义(分别为4.7±1.0 mm2 vs. 5.3±1.4 mm2和9.2±1.7 mm2 vs. 10.8±2.2 mm2,平均值±SD;p比;0.05)。然而,SFE组鼻窦膜中部附近的新成骨量明显大于SFE_Perf组(p <;0.05)。增大体积无显著性差异。与SFE组相比,SFE_Perf组上皮下腺体较少,窦膜内胶原纤维较致密。结论:大的窦膜穿孔和8周的愈合期不影响SFE术后新骨的形成。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Periodontology was founded by the British, Dutch, French, German, Scandinavian, and Swiss Societies of Periodontology.
The aim of the Journal of Clinical Periodontology is to provide the platform for exchange of scientific and clinical progress in the field of Periodontology and allied disciplines, and to do so at the highest possible level. The Journal also aims to facilitate the application of new scientific knowledge to the daily practice of the concerned disciplines and addresses both practicing clinicians and academics. The Journal is the official publication of the European Federation of Periodontology but wishes to retain its international scope.
The Journal publishes original contributions of high scientific merit in the fields of periodontology and implant dentistry. Its scope encompasses the physiology and pathology of the periodontium, the tissue integration of dental implants, the biology and the modulation of periodontal and alveolar bone healing and regeneration, diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and therapy of periodontal disease, the clinical aspects of tooth replacement with dental implants, and the comprehensive rehabilitation of the periodontal patient. Review articles by experts on new developments in basic and applied periodontal science and associated dental disciplines, advances in periodontal or implant techniques and procedures, and case reports which illustrate important new information are also welcome.