Advancing Sustainable Development Through Environmental Performance Monitoring: The Organisational Life Cycle Assessment

IF 12.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Business Strategy and The Environment Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1002/bse.4115
Salik Ahmed, Marco Ciro Liscio, Paolo Sospiro, Irene Voukkali, Antonis A. Zorpas
{"title":"Advancing Sustainable Development Through Environmental Performance Monitoring: The Organisational Life Cycle Assessment","authors":"Salik Ahmed, Marco Ciro Liscio, Paolo Sospiro, Irene Voukkali, Antonis A. Zorpas","doi":"10.1002/bse.4115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing importance of sustainability poses significant challenges to companies, particularly micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs). Product life cycle assessment focuses on individual products, often leaving MSMEs without a complete picture of their overall environmental impact, especially within complex and long value chains. Organisational Life Cycle Assessment (OLCA) appears to be a valid approach to address these challenges by assessing all activities within an organisation. OLCA offers a comprehensive view of an organisation’s sustainability performance, overcoming the challenges often faced by MSMEs, such as resource constraints and challenges within the value chain when adopting product LCA. By integrating OLCA with product LCA, companies can gain a more holistic understanding of their environmental impacts, improving both environmental assessments and ethical business conduct. The findings of this research assess OLCA’s presence in literature and industry, exploring its content and practical applications demonstrated through case studies. It emerges that the adoption and use of the methodology have great potential especially for small and medium enterprises, as they are often left outside the comprehensive view of the life cycle of a single product, making it difficult for these companies to approach environmental performance monitoring. Therefore, the OLCA could address this gap, becoming a reference approach for companies that need to disclose about environmental impact. Due to its relatively recent nature, companies still struggle with its adoption. Scientific research on this, therefore, becomes crucial in its spread and adoption, stressing the benefits and limitations, as well as providing evidence of case studies. This paper aims to address this gap and pone itself as a cornerstone for future researchers to pursue on this path and for companies to foster a broader, offering a dual perspective with product LCA.","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4115","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing importance of sustainability poses significant challenges to companies, particularly micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs). Product life cycle assessment focuses on individual products, often leaving MSMEs without a complete picture of their overall environmental impact, especially within complex and long value chains. Organisational Life Cycle Assessment (OLCA) appears to be a valid approach to address these challenges by assessing all activities within an organisation. OLCA offers a comprehensive view of an organisation’s sustainability performance, overcoming the challenges often faced by MSMEs, such as resource constraints and challenges within the value chain when adopting product LCA. By integrating OLCA with product LCA, companies can gain a more holistic understanding of their environmental impacts, improving both environmental assessments and ethical business conduct. The findings of this research assess OLCA’s presence in literature and industry, exploring its content and practical applications demonstrated through case studies. It emerges that the adoption and use of the methodology have great potential especially for small and medium enterprises, as they are often left outside the comprehensive view of the life cycle of a single product, making it difficult for these companies to approach environmental performance monitoring. Therefore, the OLCA could address this gap, becoming a reference approach for companies that need to disclose about environmental impact. Due to its relatively recent nature, companies still struggle with its adoption. Scientific research on this, therefore, becomes crucial in its spread and adoption, stressing the benefits and limitations, as well as providing evidence of case studies. This paper aims to address this gap and pone itself as a cornerstone for future researchers to pursue on this path and for companies to foster a broader, offering a dual perspective with product LCA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过环境绩效监测促进可持续发展:组织生命周期评估
可持续发展的重要性日益增加,对公司,特别是微型、小型和中型企业(MSMEs)提出了重大挑战。产品生命周期评估侧重于单个产品,往往使中小微企业无法全面了解其整体环境影响,特别是在复杂和长价值链中。通过评估组织内的所有活动,组织生命周期评估(OLCA)似乎是解决这些挑战的有效方法。OLCA提供了组织可持续发展绩效的全面视图,克服了中小微企业在采用产品LCA时经常面临的挑战,例如资源限制和价值链中的挑战。通过将OLCA与产品LCA相结合,公司可以更全面地了解其环境影响,从而改善环境评估和道德商业行为。本研究的结果评估了OLCA在文学和工业中的存在,通过案例研究探索了其内容和实际应用。这种方法的采用和使用具有巨大的潜力,特别是对中小型企业来说,因为它们经常被排除在单一产品生命周期的全面视野之外,使这些公司难以进行环境绩效监测。因此,OLCA可以弥补这一差距,成为需要披露环境影响的公司的参考方法。由于其相对较新的性质,公司仍在努力采用它。因此,这方面的科学研究对其传播和采用至关重要,强调其好处和局限性,并提供案例研究的证据。本文旨在解决这一差距,并将其本身作为未来研究人员在这条道路上追求的基石,并为公司提供更广泛的产品LCA的双重视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.50
自引率
19.40%
发文量
336
期刊介绍: Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
SDG walking or washing? A cross‐sectoral analysis of business contribution to the SDGs ESG‐Firm Performance Nexus: Evidence From an Emerging Economy Unlocking Synergies: Sufficiency Economy Philosophy for Sustainability Exploring the Impact of Supply Chain Digital Transformation on Supply Chain Performance: An Empirical Investigation Does Societal Trust Reduce Greenwashing? International Evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1