{"title":"Stopping rule and Bayesian confirmation theory","authors":"Yunbing Li, Yongfeng Yuan","doi":"10.1007/s13194-024-00630-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article mainly investigates whether common Bayesian confirmation measures are affected by stopping rules. The results indicate that difference measure <i>d</i>, log-ratio measure <i>r</i>, and log-likelihood measure <i>l</i> are not affected by non-informative stopping rules, but affected by informative stopping rules. In contrast, Carnap measure <span>\\(\\tau \\)</span>, normalized difference measure <i>n</i>, and Mortimer measure <i>m</i> are affected by (non-)informative stopping rules sometimes but sometimes aren’t. Besides, we use two examples to further illustrate that confirmation measures <i>d</i>, <i>r</i>, and <i>l</i> are better than <span>\\(\\tau ,n\\)</span>, and <i>m</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":48832,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-024-00630-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article mainly investigates whether common Bayesian confirmation measures are affected by stopping rules. The results indicate that difference measure d, log-ratio measure r, and log-likelihood measure l are not affected by non-informative stopping rules, but affected by informative stopping rules. In contrast, Carnap measure \(\tau \), normalized difference measure n, and Mortimer measure m are affected by (non-)informative stopping rules sometimes but sometimes aren’t. Besides, we use two examples to further illustrate that confirmation measures d, r, and l are better than \(\tau ,n\), and m.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal for Philosophy of Science publishes groundbreaking works that can deepen understanding of the concepts and methods of the sciences, as they explore increasingly many facets of the world we live in. It is of direct interest to philosophers of science coming from different perspectives, as well as scientists, citizens and policymakers. The journal is interested in articles from all traditions and all backgrounds, as long as they engage with the sciences in a constructive, and critical, way. The journal represents the various longstanding European philosophical traditions engaging with the sciences, but welcomes articles from every part of the world.