Improving hybrid brainstorming outcomes with computer-supported scaffolds: Prompts and cognitive group awareness

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Education Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105229
Mohammadreza Farrokhnia , Omid Noroozi , Yvette Baggen , Harm Biemans , Armin Weinberger
{"title":"Improving hybrid brainstorming outcomes with computer-supported scaffolds: Prompts and cognitive group awareness","authors":"Mohammadreza Farrokhnia ,&nbsp;Omid Noroozi ,&nbsp;Yvette Baggen ,&nbsp;Harm Biemans ,&nbsp;Armin Weinberger","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Guided by the dual pathways to creativity model (DPCM), this study explores how two computer-supported scaffolds—prompts and cognitive group awareness—can enhance the quality of ideas generated in hybrid brainstorming sessions that combine individual and group brainstorming. While prior research has employed these scaffolds to improve group work focusing on convergent thinking in CSCL settings, their application to stimulate divergent thinking in brainstorming sessions remains unexplored. To address this gap, 94 higher education students were randomly assigned into triads and tasked with generating business ideas addressing sustainability issues under three different conditions. In control condition, students generated ideas in a hybrid brainstorming session following an individual-group-individual sequence without any additional support. In experimental 1 condition (prompts), students followed the same sequence but received prompts during the first individual phase, encouraging the use of SCAMPER principles to enhance cognitive persistence. In experimental 2 condition (prompts + cognitive group awareness), students received the same prompts during the individual phases and additional support during the group phase, aimed at enhancing cognitive group awareness through the sharing of individually generated ideas to increase cognitive flexibility. To evaluate the impact of providing prompts, the outcomes of the first individual phase across all three conditions were compared, revealing that students in both experimental conditions generated ideas with significantly higher originality compared to those in control condition. To assess the influence of fostering cognitive group awareness, the outcomes of experimental 1 and 2 conditions were compared. Students in experimental 2 condition showed superior idea quality in both the group and final individual phases, as evidenced by higher originality, outperforming experimental 1 condition. Furthermore, the findings revealed that flexibility mediated the relationship between cognitive group awareness and idea originality, while also suggesting that originality can emerge through alternative pathways beyond those proposed by the DPCM.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"227 ","pages":"Article 105229"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131524002434","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Guided by the dual pathways to creativity model (DPCM), this study explores how two computer-supported scaffolds—prompts and cognitive group awareness—can enhance the quality of ideas generated in hybrid brainstorming sessions that combine individual and group brainstorming. While prior research has employed these scaffolds to improve group work focusing on convergent thinking in CSCL settings, their application to stimulate divergent thinking in brainstorming sessions remains unexplored. To address this gap, 94 higher education students were randomly assigned into triads and tasked with generating business ideas addressing sustainability issues under three different conditions. In control condition, students generated ideas in a hybrid brainstorming session following an individual-group-individual sequence without any additional support. In experimental 1 condition (prompts), students followed the same sequence but received prompts during the first individual phase, encouraging the use of SCAMPER principles to enhance cognitive persistence. In experimental 2 condition (prompts + cognitive group awareness), students received the same prompts during the individual phases and additional support during the group phase, aimed at enhancing cognitive group awareness through the sharing of individually generated ideas to increase cognitive flexibility. To evaluate the impact of providing prompts, the outcomes of the first individual phase across all three conditions were compared, revealing that students in both experimental conditions generated ideas with significantly higher originality compared to those in control condition. To assess the influence of fostering cognitive group awareness, the outcomes of experimental 1 and 2 conditions were compared. Students in experimental 2 condition showed superior idea quality in both the group and final individual phases, as evidenced by higher originality, outperforming experimental 1 condition. Furthermore, the findings revealed that flexibility mediated the relationship between cognitive group awareness and idea originality, while also suggesting that originality can emerge through alternative pathways beyond those proposed by the DPCM.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用计算机支持的支架改进混合头脑风暴结果:提示和认知群体意识
在创造力双途径模型(DPCM)的指导下,本研究探讨了两个计算机支持的框架——提示和认知群体意识——如何提高在结合个人和群体头脑风暴的混合头脑风暴会议中产生的想法的质量。虽然先前的研究已经使用这些支架来改善CSCL环境中专注于趋同思维的小组工作,但它们在头脑风暴会议中刺激发散思维的应用仍未探索。为了解决这一差距,94名高等教育学生被随机分配到三人组,任务是在三种不同的条件下提出解决可持续性问题的商业想法。在控制条件下,学生们在没有任何额外支持的情况下,按照个人-群体-个人的顺序在混合头脑风暴会议中产生想法。在实验1条件(提示)中,学生遵循相同的顺序,但在第一个个体阶段收到提示,鼓励使用SCAMPER原则来增强认知持久性。在实验2(提示+认知群体意识)条件下,学生在个体阶段得到相同的提示,在群体阶段得到额外的支持,旨在通过分享个人产生的想法来增强认知群体意识,增加认知灵活性。为了评估提供提示的影响,我们比较了所有三种条件下第一阶段的结果,发现两种实验条件下的学生产生的想法都比控制条件下的学生具有更高的独创性。为了评估认知群体意识培养的影响,比较实验1和实验2的结果。实验2条件下的学生在小组和最后的个人阶段都表现出更高的创意质量,表现为更高的独创性,优于实验1条件下的学生。此外,研究结果还揭示了灵活性在认知群体意识和创意创意之间的关系中起中介作用,同时也表明创意创意可以通过DPCM提出的其他途径产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
期刊最新文献
Understanding college students’ cross-device learning behavior in the wild: Device ecologies, physical configurations, usage patterns, and attention issues Editorial Board The synergistic effects in an AI-supported online scientific argumentation learning environment Explicit video-based instruction enhanced students’ online credibility evaluation skills: Did storifying instruction matter? Can AI support human grading? Examining machine attention and confidence in short answer scoring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1