Examining the dynamics of knowledge convergence in online learning context: A network perspective

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Education Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105222
Mengtong Xiang , Jingjing Zhang , Yue Li
{"title":"Examining the dynamics of knowledge convergence in online learning context: A network perspective","authors":"Mengtong Xiang ,&nbsp;Jingjing Zhang ,&nbsp;Yue Li","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Knowledge convergence, originating from computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL), is often defined as building a shared cognitive understanding through social interactions. With an increasing focus on large-scale collaboration and online learning in CSCL, it is crucial to examine how knowledge convergence occurs in online settings. This study investigates how learners develop cognitive consensus in online discussions and assess how social interactions and learners' role influence these dynamics in a MOOC using video-based social annotation. Mixed-methods, including Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA), Simulation Investigation for Empirical Network Analysis (SIENA), and role trajectory clustering were employed. The findings suggest that cognitive consensus in discussions originates from sharing similar experiences and evolves into more advanced levels over time. Reciprocity and transitivity are crucial for establishing network cohesion while achieving cognitive consensus. Learners with similar role trajectories tend to interact together. This study expands the traditional CSCL paradigm by examining how social interactions shape discussion network dynamics and how learners’ role trajectories influence these dynamics. We argue that network cohesiveness should be included in the framework of online knowledge convergence, alongside cognitive consensus. Dynamic network analysis is essential for understanding the complex mechanisms driving online knowledge convergence occurring, where the cognitive and social attributes of learning are interwoven.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"227 ","pages":"Article 105222"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131524002367","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Knowledge convergence, originating from computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL), is often defined as building a shared cognitive understanding through social interactions. With an increasing focus on large-scale collaboration and online learning in CSCL, it is crucial to examine how knowledge convergence occurs in online settings. This study investigates how learners develop cognitive consensus in online discussions and assess how social interactions and learners' role influence these dynamics in a MOOC using video-based social annotation. Mixed-methods, including Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA), Simulation Investigation for Empirical Network Analysis (SIENA), and role trajectory clustering were employed. The findings suggest that cognitive consensus in discussions originates from sharing similar experiences and evolves into more advanced levels over time. Reciprocity and transitivity are crucial for establishing network cohesion while achieving cognitive consensus. Learners with similar role trajectories tend to interact together. This study expands the traditional CSCL paradigm by examining how social interactions shape discussion network dynamics and how learners’ role trajectories influence these dynamics. We argue that network cohesiveness should be included in the framework of online knowledge convergence, alongside cognitive consensus. Dynamic network analysis is essential for understanding the complex mechanisms driving online knowledge convergence occurring, where the cognitive and social attributes of learning are interwoven.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线学习环境下的知识聚合动态研究:网络视角
知识汇聚源于计算机支持的协作学习(CSCL),通常被定义为通过社会互动建立共享的认知理解。随着CSCL对大规模协作和在线学习的关注日益增加,研究在线环境下的知识融合是如何发生的至关重要。本研究探讨了学习者如何在在线讨论中形成认知共识,并评估了在基于视频的社交注释的MOOC中,社会互动和学习者的角色如何影响这些动态。采用了认知网络分析(ENA)、实证网络分析模拟调查(SIENA)和角色轨迹聚类等混合方法。研究结果表明,讨论中的认知共识起源于分享相似的经历,并随着时间的推移发展到更高级的水平。互惠性和及物性是建立网络凝聚力和达成认知共识的关键。角色轨迹相似的学习者倾向于在一起互动。本研究通过研究社会互动如何塑造讨论网络动态以及学习者的角色轨迹如何影响这些动态,扩展了传统的CSCL范式。我们认为,网络内聚性应与认知共识一起纳入在线知识融合的框架。动态网络分析对于理解驱动在线知识聚合发生的复杂机制至关重要,其中学习的认知属性和社会属性相互交织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The synergistic effects in an AI-supported online scientific argumentation learning environment Explicit video-based instruction enhanced students’ online credibility evaluation skills: Did storifying instruction matter? Can AI support human grading? Examining machine attention and confidence in short answer scoring The role of perceived teacher support in students’ attitudes towards and flow experience in programming learning: A multi-group analysis of primary students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1