Comparative techno-economic evaluation of alkaline and proton exchange membrane electrolysis for hydrogen production amidst renewable energy source volatility

IF 10.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Conversion and Management Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119423
Joungho Park , Sungho Kang , Sunwoo Kim , Hana Kim , Hyun-Seok Cho , Jay H. Lee
{"title":"Comparative techno-economic evaluation of alkaline and proton exchange membrane electrolysis for hydrogen production amidst renewable energy source volatility","authors":"Joungho Park ,&nbsp;Sungho Kang ,&nbsp;Sunwoo Kim ,&nbsp;Hana Kim ,&nbsp;Hyun-Seok Cho ,&nbsp;Jay H. Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the economic feasibility of two leading electrolysis technologies—alkaline electrolysis and proton exchange membrane electrolysis—in the context of rapid temporal fluctuations from renewable energy sources. Alkaline electrolysis currently benefits from its relative maturity and established economic advantages. On the other hand, proton exchange membrane electrolysis offers enhanced operational flexibility and substantial potential for technological advancements that could significantly improve its economic viability and efficiency over the long term. Comprehensive process models of various system components are developed to evaluate the impact of minimum load requirements on these systems and explore strategies to mitigate these effects. Initially more economically viable, alkaline electrolysis could see its advantage shift with the strategic integration of batteries to reduce on/off operations and the implementation of overload operations, compared to proton exchange membrane electrolysis. A sensitivity analysis confirms the future competitiveness of these technologies, considering anticipated technological improvements, the influence of key economic variables, multi-year variability in weather patterns, and the impacts of maintenance requirements and system downtime associated with frequent on/off cycles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"325 ","pages":"Article 119423"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890424013645","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the economic feasibility of two leading electrolysis technologies—alkaline electrolysis and proton exchange membrane electrolysis—in the context of rapid temporal fluctuations from renewable energy sources. Alkaline electrolysis currently benefits from its relative maturity and established economic advantages. On the other hand, proton exchange membrane electrolysis offers enhanced operational flexibility and substantial potential for technological advancements that could significantly improve its economic viability and efficiency over the long term. Comprehensive process models of various system components are developed to evaluate the impact of minimum load requirements on these systems and explore strategies to mitigate these effects. Initially more economically viable, alkaline electrolysis could see its advantage shift with the strategic integration of batteries to reduce on/off operations and the implementation of overload operations, compared to proton exchange membrane electrolysis. A sensitivity analysis confirms the future competitiveness of these technologies, considering anticipated technological improvements, the influence of key economic variables, multi-year variability in weather patterns, and the impacts of maintenance requirements and system downtime associated with frequent on/off cycles.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可再生能源不稳定条件下碱性和质子交换膜电解制氢的技术经济比较评价
本研究探讨了两种领先的电解技术——碱性电解和质子交换膜电解——在可再生能源快速波动的背景下的经济可行性。碱电解目前得益于其相对成熟和已确立的经济优势。另一方面,质子交换膜电解提供了更高的操作灵活性和巨大的技术进步潜力,可以显著提高其长期的经济可行性和效率。开发了各种系统组件的综合过程模型,以评估最小负载要求对这些系统的影响,并探索减轻这些影响的策略。与质子交换膜电解相比,碱性电解最初更具经济可行性,但随着电池的战略性整合,以减少开/关操作和过载操作的实施,其优势将发生转变。考虑到预期的技术改进、关键经济变量的影响、天气模式的多年变化、维护需求的影响以及与频繁开/关周期相关的系统停机时间,敏感性分析证实了这些技术的未来竞争力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
期刊最新文献
Thermochemical valorization of essential oil industry waste into fuels and carbon-rich products under varying heating rates A multi-mechanism degradation model for PEMFC to unravel the aging processes on cell lifetime Post-combustion carbon capture from a natural gas combined cycle power plant with dual-cascade heat pump A low-carbon emissions co-production system for methanol and hydrogen based on complementary utilization of methane steam reforming and bi-reforming of methane Experimental investigation of the impacts of various parameters on thermal energy storage and release behavior of paraffin-based phase change materials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1