Family concerns in organ donor conversations: a qualitative embedded multiple-case study

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1186/s13054-024-05198-2
Sanne P. C. van Oosterhout, Anneke G. van der Niet, Wilson F. Abdo, Marianne Boenink, Jelle L. P. van Gurp, Gert Olthuis
{"title":"Family concerns in organ donor conversations: a qualitative embedded multiple-case study","authors":"Sanne P. C. van Oosterhout, Anneke G. van der Niet, Wilson F. Abdo, Marianne Boenink, Jelle L. P. van Gurp, Gert Olthuis","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05198-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Listening and responding to family concerns in organ and tissue donation is generally considered important, but has never been researched in real time. We aimed to explore in real time, (a) which family concerns emerge in the donation process, (b) how these concerns manifest during and after the donor conversation, and (c) how clinicians respond to the concerns during the donor conversation. A qualitative embedded multiple-case study in eight Dutch hospitals was conducted. Thematic analysis was performed based on audio recordings and direct observations of 29 donor conversations and interviews with the family members involved (n = 24). Concerns clustered around six topics: 1) Life-event of a relative’s death, 2) Dying well, 3) Tensions and fears about donation, 4) Experiences of time, 5) Procedural clarity, and 6) Involving (non-)present family. Most concerns occurred in topics 1 and 2. Clinicians mostly responded to concerns by providing information or immediate solutions, while sometimes acknowledgement sufficed. When concerns were highly charged with emotion, the clinicians’ responses were less frequently attuned to families’ needs. Cues of less clearly articulated concerns gained less follow-up. Then, concerns often remained or reappeared. The identified concerns and the distinction between clearly and less clearly articulated concerns may prove valuable for clinicians to improve family support. We advise clinicians to engage with a curious, probing attitude to enhance the dialogue around concerns, elaborate on less clearly articulated concerns and identify the informational needs of the family.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05198-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Listening and responding to family concerns in organ and tissue donation is generally considered important, but has never been researched in real time. We aimed to explore in real time, (a) which family concerns emerge in the donation process, (b) how these concerns manifest during and after the donor conversation, and (c) how clinicians respond to the concerns during the donor conversation. A qualitative embedded multiple-case study in eight Dutch hospitals was conducted. Thematic analysis was performed based on audio recordings and direct observations of 29 donor conversations and interviews with the family members involved (n = 24). Concerns clustered around six topics: 1) Life-event of a relative’s death, 2) Dying well, 3) Tensions and fears about donation, 4) Experiences of time, 5) Procedural clarity, and 6) Involving (non-)present family. Most concerns occurred in topics 1 and 2. Clinicians mostly responded to concerns by providing information or immediate solutions, while sometimes acknowledgement sufficed. When concerns were highly charged with emotion, the clinicians’ responses were less frequently attuned to families’ needs. Cues of less clearly articulated concerns gained less follow-up. Then, concerns often remained or reappeared. The identified concerns and the distinction between clearly and less clearly articulated concerns may prove valuable for clinicians to improve family support. We advise clinicians to engage with a curious, probing attitude to enhance the dialogue around concerns, elaborate on less clearly articulated concerns and identify the informational needs of the family.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
器官捐赠者对话中的家庭问题:一项定性嵌入式多案例研究
在器官和组织捐赠中,倾听和回应家人的担忧通常被认为是重要的,但从未进行过实时研究。我们的目的是实时探索,(a)在捐赠过程中出现了哪些家庭问题,(b)这些问题在与捐赠者交谈期间和之后是如何表现出来的,以及(c)临床医生在与捐赠者交谈期间如何回应这些问题。在荷兰八家医院进行了定性嵌入式多案例研究。专题分析是根据录音和对29次捐助者谈话的直接观察以及对所涉家庭成员的访谈(n = 24)进行的。人们关心的问题集中在六个方面:1)亲人死亡的生活事件,2)好好地死去,3)对捐赠的紧张和恐惧,4)时间的体验,5)程序的清晰度,6)涉及(非)在场的家人。大多数问题发生在主题1和主题2。临床医生大多通过提供信息或立即解决方案来回应担忧,而有时承认就足够了。当担忧被高度情绪化时,临床医生的反应往往不太符合家庭的需求。不太明确表达担忧的线索得到的跟进较少。然后,担忧经常存在或重新出现。确定的问题和明确和不明确表达的问题之间的区别可能对临床医生改善家庭支持有价值。我们建议临床医生以一种好奇的、探索的态度来加强围绕问题的对话,详细阐述不太明确的问题,并确定家庭的信息需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing cultural competence and communication in ICU: addressing family conflicts Ulinastatin treatment mitigates glycocalyx degradation and associated with lower postoperative delirium risk in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a multicentre observational study Association of healthy sleep patterns with incident sepsis: a large population-based prospective cohort study Heterogeneity of treatment effect: the case for individualising oxygen therapy in critically ill patients Effect of early administration of fibrinogen replacement therapy in traumatic haemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials with narrative synthesis of observational studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1