{"title":"Defining a safe and just operating space for the Norwegian economy","authors":"Thomas Røkås, Erik Gómez-Baggethun","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ‘doughnut economics’ sustainability framework defines a Safe and Just operating Space (SJS) for humanity where human needs are met within ecological limits. Downscaling this framework from global to sub-global levels can increase its policy-relevance, but also faces methodological challenges, both because limits vary across spatiotemporal scales, and because the lived experience of limits differs across cultures. Using Norway as case study, this paper downscales the doughnut's SJS framework through a bottom-up approach with the aim to increase its relevance for national stakeholders and decisions-makers. Combining Earth system data and socio-demographic data, we assess the performance of the Norwegian economy with regards to planetary boundaries and selected social indicators. Our results indicate ecological overshoots for ten out of the eleven assessed planetary boundaries. They further indicate that despite of its comparatively high social performance, Norway's economy is not providing for all its citizens` needs and rights, with significant disparities being observed across demographic groups. Although Norway is, like other Nordic countries, internationally acclaimed for its sustainability policies, an application of the SJS sustainability framework challenge the notion of a “green” and sustainable Norwegian economy by demonstrating evidence of significant inequalities within its population and largel overshoots of its fair share to global resources and ecological sinks.","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108511","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The ‘doughnut economics’ sustainability framework defines a Safe and Just operating Space (SJS) for humanity where human needs are met within ecological limits. Downscaling this framework from global to sub-global levels can increase its policy-relevance, but also faces methodological challenges, both because limits vary across spatiotemporal scales, and because the lived experience of limits differs across cultures. Using Norway as case study, this paper downscales the doughnut's SJS framework through a bottom-up approach with the aim to increase its relevance for national stakeholders and decisions-makers. Combining Earth system data and socio-demographic data, we assess the performance of the Norwegian economy with regards to planetary boundaries and selected social indicators. Our results indicate ecological overshoots for ten out of the eleven assessed planetary boundaries. They further indicate that despite of its comparatively high social performance, Norway's economy is not providing for all its citizens` needs and rights, with significant disparities being observed across demographic groups. Although Norway is, like other Nordic countries, internationally acclaimed for its sustainability policies, an application of the SJS sustainability framework challenge the notion of a “green” and sustainable Norwegian economy by demonstrating evidence of significant inequalities within its population and largel overshoots of its fair share to global resources and ecological sinks.
期刊介绍:
Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership.
Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.