Comparing accessibility to high-speed rail stations by public transit and cars: A national-scale analysis

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Transport Geography Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.104105
Long Cheng, Yuheng Chen, Shengyu He, Zheyuan Wang, Tanhua Jin, Min Yang
{"title":"Comparing accessibility to high-speed rail stations by public transit and cars: A national-scale analysis","authors":"Long Cheng, Yuheng Chen, Shengyu He, Zheyuan Wang, Tanhua Jin, Min Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.104105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High-speed rail (HSR) stations, as a crucial connectivity node within a city, can effectively serve the population in the city and stimulate economic growth. Therefore, there is an urgent need to enhance the accessibility of HSR stations to various areas within the city. Despite this, most research tends to focus on local and regional transportation stations, with a lack of research on the accessibility of HSR stations on a national scale. Additionally, most research tends to focus exclusively on the accessibility of these stations via either public transit or cars, often overlooking a holistic comparison of both transportation modes. This study aims to bridge this gap by assessing the accessibility of high-speed rail stations across 31 provincial capitals in mainland China, utilizing travel time estimation data sourced from online mapping. We measured the number of grid cells accessible to passengers by car and public transit within a given time threshold. To identify the influencing factors, we conducted a two-sample <ce:italic>t</ce:italic>-test. Our analysis reveals that cars typically provide superior accessibility compared to public transit. Moreover, we find significant variability in public transit accessibility among these cities. Medium and smaller cities exhibit notably lower levels of public transit accessibility than large cities, and mountainous cities face further reductions due to challenging terrain. Key factors contributing to these accessibility disparities are identified, leading to several policy recommendations aimed at enhancing public transit systems. These include expanding bus service coverage, improving transport infrastructure, introducing microcirculation bus routes, and further developing rail transit networks to better serve urban populations and integrate them more effectively with high-speed rail services.","PeriodicalId":48413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Geography","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Geography","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.104105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-speed rail (HSR) stations, as a crucial connectivity node within a city, can effectively serve the population in the city and stimulate economic growth. Therefore, there is an urgent need to enhance the accessibility of HSR stations to various areas within the city. Despite this, most research tends to focus on local and regional transportation stations, with a lack of research on the accessibility of HSR stations on a national scale. Additionally, most research tends to focus exclusively on the accessibility of these stations via either public transit or cars, often overlooking a holistic comparison of both transportation modes. This study aims to bridge this gap by assessing the accessibility of high-speed rail stations across 31 provincial capitals in mainland China, utilizing travel time estimation data sourced from online mapping. We measured the number of grid cells accessible to passengers by car and public transit within a given time threshold. To identify the influencing factors, we conducted a two-sample t-test. Our analysis reveals that cars typically provide superior accessibility compared to public transit. Moreover, we find significant variability in public transit accessibility among these cities. Medium and smaller cities exhibit notably lower levels of public transit accessibility than large cities, and mountainous cities face further reductions due to challenging terrain. Key factors contributing to these accessibility disparities are identified, leading to several policy recommendations aimed at enhancing public transit systems. These include expanding bus service coverage, improving transport infrastructure, introducing microcirculation bus routes, and further developing rail transit networks to better serve urban populations and integrate them more effectively with high-speed rail services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A major resurgence has occurred in transport geography in the wake of political and policy changes, huge transport infrastructure projects and responses to urban traffic congestion. The Journal of Transport Geography provides a central focus for developments in this rapidly expanding sub-discipline.
期刊最新文献
Exploring spatiotemporal characteristics of ride-hailing ridership connecting with metro stations: A comparative analysis of holidays, weekdays, and weekends Exploring biases in travel behavior patterns in big passively generated mobile data from 11 U.S. cities Liquefied natural gas trade network changes and its mechanism in the context of the Russia–Ukraine conflict Spatial inferences of visually impaired individuals concerning wayfinding: a case study of Istanbul’s Kadikoy area Comparing accessibility to high-speed rail stations by public transit and cars: A national-scale analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1