Applying Data-Driven Modeling for Streamflow Prediction in Semi-Arid Watersheds: A Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methodologies

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS pure and applied geophysics Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1007/s00024-024-03607-9
Metin Sarıgöl, Okan Mert Katipoğlu, Hüseyin Yildirim Dalkilic
{"title":"Applying Data-Driven Modeling for Streamflow Prediction in Semi-Arid Watersheds: A Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methodologies","authors":"Metin Sarıgöl,&nbsp;Okan Mert Katipoğlu,&nbsp;Hüseyin Yildirim Dalkilic","doi":"10.1007/s00024-024-03607-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Modeling monthly stream flows most accurately is of vital importance for water resource management, agricultural irrigation and efficient hydroelectric energy production, especially in semi-arid areas. Soft computing approaches have recently taken an important place in estimating streamflow time series. The potential of various data-driven approaches to predict streamflow in challenging climate conditions was evaluated. The study used machine and deep learning algorithms to model average monthly stream flows in two stream gauging stations in semi-arid region of the Konya closed basin where agriculture is at the forefront, accurate and reliable estimation of the stream flows is the basis of the study. For this, the performances of emotional neural network algorithm (EmNN), long-short term memory (LSTM), Elman neural network (ENN), nonlinear autoregressive exogenous model (NARX), recurrent neural network (RNN), group method of data handling (GMDH) were compared. The study’s unique contribution lies in its comprehensive comparison of these diverse algorithms, including newer approaches like EmNN, in the specific context of semi-arid hydrology. Partial autocorrelation analysis was applied to select input combinations, and lagged values exceeding 95% confidence limits were presented to the models as the most essential features. Artificial intelligence (AI) models use lagged stream flows to predict the streamflow time series. Statistical parameters, scatter diagrams and a time series approach are used to compare model performance. The GMDH model produced the following test results for 1604 no station: KGE: 0.656, R<sup>2</sup>: 0.608, NSE: 0.343, RMSE: 27.021, MAE: 3.834, MAPE: 0.662, MBE: −0.217, BF: 0.972. Similarly, for 1623 no station, the GMDH model yielded the following test results: KGE: 0.770, R<sup>2</sup>: 0.615, NSE: 0.531, RMSE: 0.006, MAE: 0.047, MAPE: 0.217, MBE: −0.012, BF: 0.956. In addition, the EmNN algorithm was the approach with second prediction accuracy. The findings of the study are important resources for optimizing the selection of AI models for streamflow prediction in semi-regional areas. The study also provides critical information for policymakers and decision-makers in similar climate zones worldwide for water resource management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21078,"journal":{"name":"pure and applied geophysics","volume":"181 12","pages":"3561 - 3589"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"pure and applied geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00024-024-03607-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modeling monthly stream flows most accurately is of vital importance for water resource management, agricultural irrigation and efficient hydroelectric energy production, especially in semi-arid areas. Soft computing approaches have recently taken an important place in estimating streamflow time series. The potential of various data-driven approaches to predict streamflow in challenging climate conditions was evaluated. The study used machine and deep learning algorithms to model average monthly stream flows in two stream gauging stations in semi-arid region of the Konya closed basin where agriculture is at the forefront, accurate and reliable estimation of the stream flows is the basis of the study. For this, the performances of emotional neural network algorithm (EmNN), long-short term memory (LSTM), Elman neural network (ENN), nonlinear autoregressive exogenous model (NARX), recurrent neural network (RNN), group method of data handling (GMDH) were compared. The study’s unique contribution lies in its comprehensive comparison of these diverse algorithms, including newer approaches like EmNN, in the specific context of semi-arid hydrology. Partial autocorrelation analysis was applied to select input combinations, and lagged values exceeding 95% confidence limits were presented to the models as the most essential features. Artificial intelligence (AI) models use lagged stream flows to predict the streamflow time series. Statistical parameters, scatter diagrams and a time series approach are used to compare model performance. The GMDH model produced the following test results for 1604 no station: KGE: 0.656, R2: 0.608, NSE: 0.343, RMSE: 27.021, MAE: 3.834, MAPE: 0.662, MBE: −0.217, BF: 0.972. Similarly, for 1623 no station, the GMDH model yielded the following test results: KGE: 0.770, R2: 0.615, NSE: 0.531, RMSE: 0.006, MAE: 0.047, MAPE: 0.217, MBE: −0.012, BF: 0.956. In addition, the EmNN algorithm was the approach with second prediction accuracy. The findings of the study are important resources for optimizing the selection of AI models for streamflow prediction in semi-regional areas. The study also provides critical information for policymakers and decision-makers in similar climate zones worldwide for water resource management.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用数据驱动模型在半干旱流域的流量预测:机器学习和深度学习方法的比较评价
最准确地模拟月度河流流量对水资源管理、农业灌溉和高效水力发电至关重要,特别是在半干旱地区。软计算方法最近在估计流时间序列方面占据了重要地位。评估了各种数据驱动方法在具有挑战性的气候条件下预测流量的潜力。本研究利用机器和深度学习算法对科尼亚半干旱区两个河流测量站的月平均流量进行建模,准确、可靠地估算河流流量是研究的基础。为此,比较了情绪神经网络算法(EmNN)、长短期记忆算法(LSTM)、Elman神经网络算法(ENN)、非线性自回归外生模型(NARX)、递归神经网络算法(RNN)、数据处理分组方法(GMDH)的性能。这项研究的独特贡献在于,它在半干旱水文的特定背景下,对这些不同的算法进行了全面的比较,包括EmNN等较新的方法。采用偏自相关分析选择输入组合,并将超过95%置信限的滞后值作为最基本特征呈现给模型。人工智能(AI)模型使用滞后流来预测流时间序列。统计参数、散点图和时间序列方法用于比较模型的性能。GMDH模型对1604个无站点的检验结果为:KGE: 0.656, R2: 0.608, NSE: 0.343, RMSE: 27.021, MAE: 3.834, MAPE: 0.662, MBE:−0.217,BF: 0.972。同样,对于1623个无站点,GMDH模型得到以下检验结果:KGE: 0.770, R2: 0.615, NSE: 0.531, RMSE: 0.006, MAE: 0.047, MAPE: 0.217, MBE:−0.012,BF: 0.956。此外,EmNN算法是第二种预测精度的方法。研究结果为优化半区域人工智能流量预测模型的选择提供了重要资源。该研究还为全球类似气候带的决策者提供了水资源管理的关键信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
pure and applied geophysics
pure and applied geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
240
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: pure and applied geophysics (pageoph), a continuation of the journal "Geofisica pura e applicata", publishes original scientific contributions in the fields of solid Earth, atmospheric and oceanic sciences. Regular and special issues feature thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and state-of-the-art surveys. Long running journal, founded in 1939 as Geofisica pura e applicata Publishes peer-reviewed original scientific contributions and state-of-the-art surveys in solid earth and atmospheric sciences Features thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and is a major source for publications on tsunami research Coverage extends to research topics in oceanic sciences See Instructions for Authors on the right hand side.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between TTI and Various Thunderstorm Related Parameters over Kerala, India Frequency-dependent Layered Q Model and Attenuation Tomography of the Himachal North-West Himalaya, India: Insight to Explore Crustal Variation Adaptive Window Approach for Curie Depth Calculation Based on Modified Centroid Method and the Application in the South China Block Modeling the Ventilation of the Vortex Periphery for Anticyclonic Quasi-Permanent Lofoten Vortex Stable Distribution of Fractional Fluctuations of Well Log Data in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1